Biopsy Technique Has No Impact on Local Recurrence After Breast‐Conserving Therapy

Abstract: Image‐guided core needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) is an incisional biopsy technique that has been associated with tumor cell displacement. Theoretically tumor cell displacement may affect local recurrence rates in patients treated with breast‐conserving therapy (BCT). We performed a study to determine if the biopsy method impacted local control rates following BCT. Patients with nonpalpable breast cancer (invasive and intraductal) diagnosed at our institution and treated with BCT between July 1993 and July 1996 were selected to provide a follow‐up period in which the majority of local recurrences should be detected. Patients were divided into two groups based on their method of diagnosis. Group I patients were diagnosed by IGCNBB and group II patients were diagnosed by wire localized excisional breast biopsy (WLEBB). Factors potentially affecting local recurrence rates were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred eleven patients were treated with BCT, 132 were diagnosed by IGCNBB and 79 by WLEBB. The two patient groups were similar when compared for prognostic factors and treatment. All patients' BCT included histologically negative margins. There were 4 (3.0%) local recurrences in Group I at a median follow‐up of 44.4 months and 2 (2.5%) local recurrences in group II at a median follow‐up of 50.1 months. This difference was not significant. Breast cancer patients diagnosed by IGCNBB can be treated by BCT with acceptable local control rates. Additional surveillance of our institutional experience and others' is mandatory to validate IGCNBB as the preferred biopsy method for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.

[1]  G. Farr,et al.  Benign Diagnosis by Image-Guided Core-Needle Breast Biopsy , 2000, The American surgeon.

[2]  G. Farr,et al.  A core breast biopsy diagnosis of invasive carcinoma allows for definitive surgical treatment planning. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[3]  G. Farr,et al.  Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[4]  L. Liberman,et al.  Impact of core biopsy on the surgical management of impalpable breast cancer. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  T. Yeatman,et al.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. , 1996, JAMA.

[6]  L. Liberman,et al.  Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  L. Liberman,et al.  Displacement of carcinomatous epithelium in surgical breast specimens following stereotaxic core biopsy. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  M. Cranor,et al.  Epithelial Displacement in Surgical Breast Specimens Following Needling Procedures , 1994, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[9]  M. Kaye,et al.  Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  U. Dyreborg,et al.  Needle biopsy of breast cancer. Appearance of tumour cells along the needle track. , 1993, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  A. Sardi,et al.  The significance of mammographic findings after breast-conserving therapy for carcinoma of the breast. , 1991, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[12]  D. Kopans,et al.  Does preoperative needle localization lead to an increase in local breast cancer recurrence? , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  D. Bauermeister,et al.  The role of fine-needle aspiration in the management of solid breast masses. , 1988, Archives of surgery.

[14]  B Fisher,et al.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Robbins,et al.  A late look at the safety of aspiration biopsy , 1962, Cancer.