Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures

Background: The purpose of this study was to collect all available randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the treatment of open tibial fractures with an external fixator (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for meta-analysis to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making. Material and methods: The systematic review was undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Review). An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed until 1 March 2023 to identify RCTs which compared either IMN or EF to fix the open tibial fracture. Outcome measures were: postoperative superficial and deep infection, time to union, delayed union, malunion, nonunion and hardware failure. In addition, pain and health-related quality of life were evaluated after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: Sixteen publications comprising 1011 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that the IMN technique had a lower postoperative superficial infection and malunion rate (RR = 3.56, 95%CI = 2.56–4.95 and RR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.12–3.44, respectively), but higher hardware failure occurrence in contrast to EF (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.13–0.69). No significant differences were found in the union time, delayed union or nonunion rate, and postoperative deep infection rate between the treatments. Lower levels of pain were found in the EF group (RR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.02–0.17, p < 0.001). A difference in quality of life favoring IMN after 3 months was found (RR = −0.04, 95%CI = −0.05–0.03, p < 0.001), however, no statistical difference was found after 12 months (RR = 0.03, 95%CI = −0.05–0.11, p = 0.44). Conclusions: Meta-analysis presented reduced incidence rates of superficial infection, malunion, and health-related quality of life 3 months after treatment in IMN. However, EF led to a significant reduction in pain and incidence rate of hardware failure. Postoperative deep infection, delayed union, nonunion and health-related quality of life 12 months following therapy were similar between groups. More high-quality RCTs should be conducted to provide reliable evidence-based data for clinical decision-making.

[1]  J. Liu,et al.  Comparing external fixators and intramedullary nailing for treating open tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2023, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[2]  R. Rohilla,et al.  Functional and radiological outcomes of primary ring fixator versus antibiotic nail in open tibial diaphyseal fractures: A prospective study. , 2022, Injury.

[3]  G. Slobogean,et al.  Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Fixation for the Treatment of Open Tibial Shaft Fractures in Uganda: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2022, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2020, BMJ.

[5]  F. Frihagen,et al.  Taylor Spatial Frame™ or reamed intramedullary nailing for closed fractures of the tibial shaft. A randomized controlled trial. , 2020, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  G. Maccauro,et al.  Intramedullary antibiotic coated nail in tibial fracture: a systematic review. , 2020, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[7]  S. Morshed,et al.  Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Fixation in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures in Tanzania: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  V. Khanna,et al.  Unreamed Intra-Medullary Nail Versus Half Pin External Fixator in Grade III [A & B] Open tibia fractures. , 2019, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[9]  Q. Fu,et al.  External Fixation versus Unreamed Tibial Intramedullary Nailing for Open Tibial Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[10]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Open fractures of the lower extremity , 2018, EFORT open reviews.

[11]  P. Tugwell,et al.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[12]  W. Chen,et al.  Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing is a Better Alternative than External Fixator for Gustilo Grade IIIB Tibial Fractures Based on a Meta-Analysis , 2016, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[13]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Which Surgical Treatment for Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Results in the Fewest Reoperations? A Network Meta-analysis , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  V. Valenti,et al.  Bone tissue repair in patients with open diaphyseal tibial fracture treated with biplanar external fixation or reamed locked intramedullary nailing. , 2014, Injury.

[15]  Xian Xu,et al.  A meta-analysis of external fixator versus intramedullary nails for open tibial fracture fixation , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[16]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Ilizarov external fixation or locked intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal tibial fractures: a randomized, prospective study of 58 consecutive patients , 2014, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[17]  Aimin Chen,et al.  Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[18]  Liang-yu Zhao,et al.  Treatment of Gustilo grade III tibial fractures with unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixator: A meta-analysis , 2012, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[19]  Hossein Mohammadpour,et al.  AO tubular external fixation vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures: a single-center randomized clinical trial. , 2011, Pakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS.

[20]  J. Esterhai,et al.  Open Tibial Shaft Fractures: II. Definitive Management and Limb Salvage , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[21]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[22]  S. Montgomery,et al.  Decreasing incidence of tibial shaft fractures between 1998 and 2004: Information based on 10,627 Swedish inpatients , 2008, Acta orthopaedica.

[23]  C. Rohde,et al.  Gustilo Grade IIIB Tibial Fractures Requiring Microvascular Free Flaps: External Fixation Versus Intramedullary Rod Fixation , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[24]  M. İnan,et al.  Treatment of type IIIA open fractures of tibial shaft with Ilizarov external fixator versus unreamed tibial nailing , 2007, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[25]  Arild Aamodt,et al.  External fixation versus locked intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft fractures: a prospective, randomised study of 78 patients , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[26]  G. Hosny,et al.  Ilizarov external fixator for open fractures of the tibial shaft , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[27]  C. Zalavras,et al.  Open fractures: evaluation and management. , 2003 .

[28]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[29]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  The epidemiology of open long bone fractures. , 1998, Injury.

[30]  Y. Tu,et al.  Unreamed interlocking nail versus external fixator for open type III tibia fractures. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[31]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  External fixation for type III open tibial fractures. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  G. Whitelaw,et al.  The treatment of open tibial fractures using nonreamed flexible intramedullary fixation. , 1990, Orthopaedic review.

[33]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: Ender nailing versus external fixation. A randomized, prospective comparison. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  L. Oginni,et al.  Comparison of unreamed interlocking nail and external fixation in open tibia shaft fracture management. , 2014, West African journal of medicine.

[35]  T. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Trends in the Management of Open Fractures , 2006 .

[36]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[37]  P. Tornetta,et al.  Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures. A prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.