Leveling the Digital Playing Field

As increasing numbers of students with learning disabilities (LD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) transition to postsecondary education, they encounter a heightened need for proficiency with a wide range of learning technologies. Whereas the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA) requires consideration of a student's assistive technology training needs in high school, the Americans With Disabilities Act does not require any evaluation or training services for postsecondary students with disabilities. In an era of measurable outcomes, it is critical for secondary school personnel to consider effective assessments and relevant interventions when college-bound students with cognitive disabilities lack proficiency with these technologies. Survey research at a highly competitive public university found significant differences between the technology needs, preferences, and fluency of undergraduates with and without disabilities. This article presents findings from that study as well as implications for teachers and evaluators who assist students with LD and ADHD in their transition planning for postsecondary education.

[1]  H. Swanson,et al.  Cognition, Metacognition, and Achievement of College Students with Learning Disabilities , 2005 .

[2]  Joan M. McGuire,et al.  Compensation Strategies Used by High-Ability Students With Learning Disabilities who Succeed In College , 2000 .

[3]  S. Calhoun,et al.  Learning Disabilities and ADHD , 2000 .

[4]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes , 1999 .

[5]  Charlotte A. Mull,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Transition to Postsecondary Education of Students with Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[6]  Matthew T. Marino,et al.  Making Informed Assistive Technology Decisions for Students with High Incidence Disabilities , 2006 .

[7]  L. Katz,et al.  Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders , 2002 .

[8]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Educational Technology: Media for Inquiry, Communication, Construction, and Expression , 1997 .

[9]  S. C. Ehrmann.  IMPLEMENTING THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES: Technology as Lever , 2004 .

[10]  Skip Stahl,et al.  Assistive Technology, Universal Design, Universal Design for Learning: Improved Learning Opportunities , 2003 .

[11]  S. Reis,et al.  Compensation Strategies Used by High-Ability Students with Learning Disabilities , 2004 .

[12]  Cathy Henderson,et al.  College Freshmen with Disabilities, 2001: A Biennial Statistical Profile. , 1995 .

[13]  Charles M. Vest,et al.  Pen Content and the Emerging Global Meta-University. , 2006 .

[14]  Moon-Heum Cho,et al.  The Effects of Design Strategies for Promoting Students' Self-Regulated Learning Skills on Students' Self-Regulation and Achievements in Online Learning Environments , 2005 .

[15]  Torri Ortiz Lienemann,et al.  Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Students with Learning Disabilities , 2006 .

[16]  Robert Reid,et al.  Self-Regulation Interventions for Children with Attention Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder , 2005 .

[17]  S. Reis,et al.  The Differential Impact of Academic Self-Regulatory Methods on Academic Achievement Among University Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 2003, Journal of learning disabilities.