Ship detection by different data selection templates and multilayer perceptrons from incoherent maritime radar data

This study presents a novel way for detecting ships in sea clutter. For this purpose, the information contained in the Radar images obtained by an incoherent X-band maritime Radar is used. The ship detection is solved by feedforward artificial neural networks, such as the multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). In a first approach, the MLP processes the information extracted from the Radar images using the commonly used horizontal and vertical selection templates. But, if a suitable combination of these selection templates is done, better detection performances are achieved. So, two improved selection templates are proposed, which are based on cross and plus shapes. All these templates are also applied in a commonly used detector taken as reference, the CA-CFAR detector. Its performance is compared with the one achieved by the proposed detector. This comparison shows how the MLP-based detector outperforms the CA-CFAR detector in all the cases under study. The results are presented in terms of objective (probabilities of false alarm and detection) and subjective estimations of their performances. The improved MLP-based detector also presents low computational cost and high robustness in its performance against changes in the sea conditions and ship properties.

[1]  Manuel Rosa-Zurera,et al.  Sea Clutter Reduction and Target Enhancement by Neural Networks in a Marine Radar System , 2009, Sensors.

[2]  Zoubeida Messali,et al.  Performance of Distributed CFAR Processors in Pearson Distributed Clutter , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[3]  Vahid Tabataba Vakili,et al.  Introducing Switching Ordered Statistic CFAR Type I in Different Radar Environments , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[4]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[5]  A. Harati-Mokhtari,et al.  Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[6]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[7]  M. Barkat,et al.  Automatic censoring CFAR detector based on ordered data variability for nonhomogeneous environments , 2005 .

[8]  Francisco López-Ferreras,et al.  Study of Two Error Functions to Approximate the Neyman–Pearson Detector Using Supervised Learning Machines , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Bruce W. Suter,et al.  The multilayer perceptron as an approximation to a Bayes optimal discriminant function , 1990, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[10]  F. Soltani,et al.  Cell-averaging CFAR detection in compound clutter with spatially correlated texture and speckle , 1999 .

[11]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  Radial basis function neural network for pulse radar detection , 2007 .

[12]  Henry Leung,et al.  Signal detection using the radial basis function coupled map lattice , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[13]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[14]  Saleem A. Kassam,et al.  Analysis of CFAR processors in homogeneous background , 1988 .

[15]  Gareth J. Janacek,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation and random number generation , 1988, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[16]  R Vicen-Bueno,et al.  Sea clutter power reduction in radar measurement systems by feedforward multilayer perceptrons with medium input data integration rate , 2009, 2009 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[17]  Friedwart Ziemer,et al.  RADAR SURVEY OF NEAR SHORE BATHYMETRY WITHIN THE OROMA PROJECT , 2004 .