Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND The impact of capsular invasion on the survival of patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has attracted little attention in the literature and remains controversial. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the value of capsular invasion, without perirenal fat invasion, on the prognosis of patients with localized clear-cell RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between 1984 and 2007, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 317 consecutive patients with localized clear-cell RCC (pT1-T2N0M0) who underwent radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery at our institution. Overall, 299 patients were eligible for the study. We analyzed clinical (presentation and body mass index [BMI]) and pathologic (tumor size, Fuhrman nuclear grade, collecting system invasion, microvascular invasion, and capsular involvement) parameters. MEASUREMENTS Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox regression model was used to determine the significant prognostic factors based on multivariate analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Renal capsular invasion was observed in 106 of 299 patients (35.5%). Capsular invasion had a statistically significant association with age, symptomatic presentation, tumor diameter, pathologic stage, collecting system invasion, and microvascular invasion. The mean follow-up was 60.5 mo (range: 1-249). The 5-yr RFS and CSS rates for tumors with capsular invasion were significantly lower compared with rates for tumors without invasion (77.7% vs 92.3% and 85.5% vs 95.7%, respectively; p=0.0004). Multivariate analysis showed that BMI (hazard ratio [HR]=0.19), stage (HR=2.45), and capsular invasion (HR=3.36) were independent prognostic factors of disease recurrence. With respect to CSS, BMI (HR=0.20), tumor size (HR=1.13), and capsular invasion (HR=4.03) were the factors related to death. Nevertheless, we recognize that these findings may be limited by the study's retrospective, single-institution design. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that capsular invasion is associated with poor survival in patients with localized clear-cell RCC.

[1]  J. Lam,et al.  Prognostic relevance of capsular involvement and collecting system invasion in stage I and II renal cell carcinoma , 2007, BJU international.

[2]  S. Pahernik,et al.  Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[3]  F. Erdoğan,et al.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma , 2004, International journal of clinical practice.

[4]  F. Guillé,et al.  Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy , 2005, Cancer.

[5]  J. Lynch,et al.  Increasing incidence of all stages of kidney cancer in the last 2 decades in the United States: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Renal cell cancer stage migration , 2008, Cancer.

[7]  J. Cheville,et al.  An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[8]  A. Volpe Editorial comment on: Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2009, European urology.

[9]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[10]  C. Nishida,et al.  Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies , 2004, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Srougi,et al.  Microvascular tumor invasion, tumor size and Fuhrman grade: a pathological triad for prognostic evaluation of renal cell carcinoma. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Jeff Scott Renal Cell , 2020, Definitions.

[13]  J. Lam,et al.  Surveillance following radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma , 2005, Current urology reports.

[14]  M. Carini,et al.  Histopathologic analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. , 2009, European urology.

[15]  S. Bangdiwala,et al.  Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreement , 1997 .

[16]  J. Cheville,et al.  Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[17]  C. Kwak,et al.  Prognostic implication of capsular invasion without perinephric fat infiltration in localized renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Urology.

[18]  A. Minervini,et al.  Prognostic value of nuclear grading in patients with intracapsular (pT1‐pT2) renal cell carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[19]  G. Ergün,et al.  Does renal capsular invasion have any prognostic value in localized renal cell carcinoma? , 2008, The Journal of urology.