Seismic Strengthening and Energy Efficiency: Towards an Integrated Approach for the Rehabilitation of Existing RC Buildings

In Italy, most of the residential buildings (77%) were constructed before 1981, when only 25% of the national territory was classified as seismic. Further, the first provisions addressing thermal performance criteria were introduced in 1991, when about 88% of the existing Italian buildings had already been realized. Therefore, the Italian building stock is characterized by a large deficit in terms of both seismic capacity and thermal insulation. The large number of buildings having inadequate performance, both seismic and thermal, calls for rehabilitation interventions that are based on an integrated and sustainability-oriented approach. In the paper, the influence on seismic performance deriving from some retrofitting techniques, generally adopted to enhance the thermal performance of infill walls, has been evaluated. A common residential RC building representative of existing buildings designed only for vertical loads has been studied. The seismic performances have been evaluated through Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA). A first comparison is related to a thermal retrofitting intervention made by replacing the existing masonry infill walls with new elements that are able to ensure an adequate thermal protection. Further, a retrofitting intervention based on the “double skin” technique, where new infilled RC frames are added and connected to the existing ones, has been investigated in terms of seismic and thermal performance.

[1]  Gian Michele Calvi Choices and Criteria for Seismic Strengthening , 2013 .

[2]  P. Bazzurro,et al.  RINTC project: Assessing the (Implicit) Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures in Italy , 2017 .

[3]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[4]  Eugenio Morello,et al.  Ricette di chiusura. Involucri in laterizio , 2006 .

[5]  Ezio Giuriani,et al.  Coupling energy refurbishment with structural strengthening in retrofit interventions , 2015 .

[6]  M. Fardis DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR MASONRY-INFILLED RC FRAMES , 1999 .

[7]  Simone Ferrari,et al.  Il D.Lgsl. 192/2005 e le chiusure verticali opache , 2006 .

[8]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[9]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Seismic damage recognition based on field survey and remote sensing: general remarks and examples from the 2016 Central Italy earthquake , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[10]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  RINTC PROJECT: NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSES OF ITALIAN CODE-CONFORMING REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS FOR RISK OF COLLAPSE ASSESSMENT , 2017 .

[11]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Preliminary analysis of a soft‐storey mechanism after the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake , 2011 .

[12]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[13]  Frank McKenna,et al.  OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[14]  Tommaso Albanesi,et al.  Caratterizzazione teorico-sperimentale di tamponature in laterizio per telai in cemento armato , 2007 .

[15]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Energy Efficiency and Seismic Resilience: A Common Approach , 2016 .

[16]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Structures , 2014 .

[17]  T. Rossetto,et al.  Field observations from the Aquila, Italy earthquake of April 6, 2009 , 2011 .

[18]  Angelo Masi,et al.  In plane performance of RC infilled frames under seismic actions: Experimental versus code provision values , 2016 .

[19]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Seismic vulnerability and risk analysis of the old building stock at urban scale: application to a neighbourhood in Lisbon , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design and Response of Bare and Masonry-Infilled Reinforced Concrete Buildings Part II: Infilled Structures , 1997 .

[21]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Gravity Load Designed R/C Frames , 2003 .

[22]  Ezio Giuriani,et al.  Experimental testing of engineered masonry infill walls for post-earthquake structural damage control , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[23]  Fausto Mistretta,et al.  Assessment Method for Combined Structural and Energy Retrofitting in Masonry Buildings , 2017 .

[24]  J. Drexhage Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment , 2002 .

[25]  Francesca da Porto,et al.  Performance of masonry buildings during the Emilia 2012 earthquake , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Combining in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infills in the seismic analysis of RC buildings , 2014 .

[27]  Paolo Ricci,et al.  2012 Emilia earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete buildings response , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[28]  Fabrizio Mollaioli,et al.  Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings , 2014, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[29]  Christos Zeris,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS: II. A CASE STUDY FOR REGULAR AND IRREGULAR BUILDINGS , 2006 .

[30]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Dynamic collapse analysis for a reinforced concrete frame sustaining shear and axial failures , 2008 .

[31]  Paolo Ricci,et al.  6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance , 2011 .

[32]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings , 2009 .

[33]  Guido Magenes,et al.  Innovative seismic solution for clay masonry infills with sliding joints: Principles and details , 2016 .

[34]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Fragility curves of gravity-load designed RC buildings with regularity in plan , 2015 .

[35]  Andrea Prota,et al.  A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit , 2017 .

[36]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  SOFT STOREY EFFECTS IN UNIFORMLY INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES , 2001 .

[37]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake , 2011 .

[38]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Cyclic Tests on External RC Beam-Column Joints: Role of Seismic Design Level and Axial Load Value on the Ultimate Capacity , 2013 .

[39]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Efficiency and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Seismic Strengthening Techniques for Old Residential Buildings in Lisbon , 2018 .

[40]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[41]  R. Marino Francesco Paolo,et al.  La certificazione energetica degli edifici. D.Lgs. 192/2005 e 311/2006 – III edizione – Algoritmi di calcolo ed esperienze internazionali. Edifici ad alta efficienza – In appendice, note esplicative e raccolta normative , 2007 .

[42]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Consistency of analysis methods considered in EC8-3 for the seismic assessment of RC existing buildings , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[43]  F. da Porto,et al.  The INSYSME project: Innovative construction systems for earthquake resistant masonry infill walls , 2016 .

[44]  G. Calvi,et al.  Seismic performance of masonry-infilled r.c. frames: benefits of slight reinforcements , 2004 .