Performance Measures in Electric Power Networks Under Line Contingencies

Classes of performance measures expressed in terms of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathcal H}_2$</tex-math></inline-formula>-norms have been recently introduced to quantify the response of coupled dynamical systems to external perturbations. So far, investigations of these performance measures have been restricted to nodal perturbations. Here, we go beyond these earlier works and consider the equally important, but so far neglected case of line perturbations. We consider a network-reduced power system, where a Kron reduction has eliminated passive buses. Identifying the effect that a line fault in the physical network has on the Kron-reduced network, we find that performance measures depend on whether the faulted line connects two passive, two active buses, or one active to one passive bus. In all cases, performance measures depend quadratically on the original load on the faulted line times a topology-dependent factor. Our theoretical formalism being restricted to Dirac-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\delta$</tex-math></inline-formula> perturbations, we investigate numerically the validity of our results for finite-time line faults. For uniform damping over inertia ratios, we find good agreement with theoretical predictions for longer fault durations in systems with more inertia, for which eigenmodes of the network are harder to excite.

[1]  F. Bullo,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Synchronization in a Lossless Structure-Preserving Power Network Model , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[2]  Bassam Bamieh,et al.  The Price of Synchrony: Evaluating the Resistive Losses in Synchronizing Power Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[3]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Yilu Liu,et al.  Developing generic dynamic models for the 2030 Eastern Interconnection grid , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition.

[5]  John K. Tomfohr,et al.  Lecture Notes on Physics , 1879, Nature.

[6]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix Analysis, 2nd Ed , 2012 .

[7]  Philippe Jacquod,et al.  Resistance distance criterion for optimal slack bus selection , 2017, ArXiv.

[8]  L. Ryder,et al.  Quantum Field Theory , 2001, Foundations of Modern Physics.

[9]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[10]  Enrico Bozzo,et al.  Resistance distance, closeness, and betweenness , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[11]  T. Coletta,et al.  Robustness of Synchrony in Complex Networks and Generalized Kirchhoff Indices. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[12]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[13]  Milad Siami,et al.  Systemic measures for performance and robustness of large-scale interconnected dynamical networks , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Dirk Witthaut,et al.  Supply networks: Instabilities without overload , 2014 .

[15]  Florian Dörfler,et al.  Kron Reduction of Graphs With Applications to Electrical Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[16]  Bassam Bamieh,et al.  Coherence in Large-Scale Networks: Dimension-Dependent Limitations of Local Feedback , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Mi-Ching Tsai,et al.  Robust and Optimal Control , 2014 .

[18]  F. Wilczek Quantum Field Theory , 1998, hep-th/9803075.

[19]  Fu Lin,et al.  Optimal Control of Vehicular Formations With Nearest Neighbor Interactions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  A.R. Bergen,et al.  A Structure Preserving Model for Power System Stability Analysis , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[21]  Florian Dörfler,et al.  Optimal Placement of Virtual Inertia in Power Grids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[22]  Dennice F. Gayme,et al.  Performance Measures for Linear Oscillator Networks Over Arbitrary Graphs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[23]  Laurent Pagnier,et al.  Optimal placement of inertia and primary control in high voltage power grids , 2019, 2019 53rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[24]  Fu Lin,et al.  Design of Optimal Sparse Interconnection Graphs for Synchronization of Oscillator Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  J. Sherman,et al.  Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to a Change in One Element of a Given Matrix , 1950 .

[26]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Global performance metrics for synchronization of heterogeneously rated power systems: The role of machine models and inertia , 2017, Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.

[27]  Mihailo R. Jovanovic,et al.  Input-Output Analysis and Decentralized Optimal Control of Inter-Area Oscillations in Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  G. Stewart,et al.  Matrix Perturbation Theory , 1990 .

[29]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Getting a grip on the electrical grid , 2013 .

[30]  I. Gutman,et al.  Resistance distance and Laplacian spectrum , 2003 .

[31]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[32]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[33]  Bassam Bamieh,et al.  The price of synchrony: Resistive losses due to phase synchronization in power networks , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[34]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Power System Dynamics: Stability and Control , 2008 .

[35]  M. Randic,et al.  Resistance distance , 1993 .

[36]  John Lygeros,et al.  Topology design for optimal network coherence , 2014, 2015 European Control Conference (ECC).

[37]  Tommaso Coletta,et al.  Linear stability and the Braess paradox in coupled-oscillator networks and electric power grids. , 2015, Physical review. E.

[38]  Marc Timme,et al.  Impact of network topology on synchrony of oscillatory power grids. , 2013, Chaos.