Cancer and facial disfigurement: reducing survivors' stigma in social interaction.

Patients with orbital and periorbital cancer expect to be cured or survive for several years after their malignancy is detected and surgically removed. However, despite advancements in reconstructive surgery, survivors often remain facially disfigured and spend significant portions of their lives dealing with stigma, a mark of social disgrace. Although research remains limited, this article describes a qualitative study of social interaction leading to stigma in individuals with facial disfigurement caused by cancer surgery, as well as the experiences of their family members. In particular, the current study focused on interaction between patients and strangers and acquaintances (secondary groups). In-depth interviews with patients and their family members were conducted and analyzed using Grounded Theory. Three primary patterns of interaction were identified: intrusion, sympathy, and benign neglect. Those patterns refer to conditions that are decreasingly favorable to the creation of stigma, where intrusion and sympathy foster stigma but benign neglect does not. Through that knowledge, oncology nurses will be able to better inform patients and family members on the conditions leading to stigma.

[1]  R. Goldwyn Transformation and Identity: The Face and Plastic Surgery , 1975 .

[2]  E. Wright,et al.  The dimensionality of stigma: a comparison of its impact on the self of persons with HIV/AIDS and cancer. , 2000, Journal of health and social behavior.

[3]  Spencer E. Cahill,et al.  Reconsidering the Stigma of Physical Disability: Wheelchair Use and Public Kindness , 1995 .

[4]  M. Angermeyer,et al.  Lay beliefs about schizophrenic disorder: the results of a population survey in Germany , 1994, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  M. Tamburrino,et al.  Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice , 2003 .

[6]  R. Lansdown,et al.  Meeting the Psychosocial Impact of Facial Disfigurement: Developing a Clinical Service for Children and Families , 2000 .

[7]  David S Zee,et al.  Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities , 2009, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[9]  S. Valente Visual Disfigurement and Depression , 2004, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[10]  E. Molleman,et al.  Facial disfigurement in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of social self-efficacy. , 2006, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  K. Baker,et al.  Cancers of the head and neck , 1987, Cancer Treatment and Research.

[12]  A. Feingold Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[13]  J. M. van Doorne,et al.  Facial disfigurement after cancer resection: a problem with an extra dimension. , 1994, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[14]  Psychosocial Aspects of Orbitofacial Disfigurement in Cancer Patients , 2010 .

[15]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[16]  Judith A. Holton,et al.  The Coding Process and Its Challenges , 2010 .

[17]  P. Wingo,et al.  Cancer statistics by race and ethnicity , 1998, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  Christine Callahan Facial Disfigurement and Sense of Self in Head and Neck Cancer , 2005, Social work in health care.

[19]  J. Susman,et al.  Disability, stigma and deviance. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[20]  P W Corrigan,et al.  Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[21]  J. Cole About face , 1998, Nature.

[22]  Michael J. Hughes The Social Consequences of Facial Disfigurement , 1998 .

[23]  E. Roumanas,et al.  Prosthetic-surgical collaborations in the rehabilitation of patients with head and neck defects. , 1997, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[24]  M. Hawkesworth Disabling Spatialities and the Regulation of a Visible Secret , 2001 .

[25]  A. Clarke Psychosocial aspects of facial disfigurement: Problems, management and the role of a lay-led organization , 1999 .

[26]  A. Thompson,et al.  Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different. , 2001, Clinical psychology review.

[27]  P. Garrud,et al.  Coming to Terms , 2006, Journal of health psychology.

[28]  M. Dropkin Body image and quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery. , 1999, Cancer practice.

[29]  A. Clarke,et al.  Psychosocial distress associated with disfiguring eye conditions , 2003, Eye.

[30]  Nichola. Rumsey,et al.  The Social Psychology of Facial Appearance , 1998 .

[31]  Simon Rogers,et al.  Facial appearance after operations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of casenotes and patient-completed questionnaire. , 2006, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[32]  P. Fodor Facial disfigurement: Problems and management of social interaction and implications for mental health , 1991 .

[33]  G. Kent Understanding the experiences of people with disfigurements: An integration of four models of social and psychological functioning , 2000, Psychology, health & medicine.