Life cycle assessment of small-scale greywater reclamation systems combined with conventional centralized water systems for the City of Atlanta, Georgia.

Abstract This study examines a hybrid system (HS) that combines a greywater reclamation system with the centralized water system. Greywater is collected from laundry, showers, faucets and dishwashing and is reclaimed for non-potable on-site purposes (i.e., irrigation and toilet flushing) by using submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs). This technology can reduce the burden of the conventional system (CS), defined as the water supply and wastewater treatment systems within the City of Atlanta. We conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison of the HS and CS using TRACI v2.1, which simulates ten impacts related to the ecosystem, human health and natural resources. We simulated the technology feasibility for nine residential zones, including five single-family house zones (SFZs) and four multi-family apartment building zones (MFZs) that vary by land use and population density (0.4–62.2 persons per 1000 m2). The greywater reclamation system reduces non-potable water demand in SFZs (by 17–49%) and MFZs (by 6–32%) while simultaneously reducing electricity consumption by 17–49% and 32–41% for SFZs and MFZs, respectively. Moreover, the LCA score of the CS is 20–41% lower than that of the HS. However, the sensitivity analysis indicates that energy sources in electricity generation play a critical role in reducing and stabilizing life cycle impacts. The results indicate that the LCA scores stabilize at higher population densities. Therefore, once the greywater reclamation capacity is exhausted, municipalities can further decrease the life cycle impacts related to water infrastructure through improvements in the electricity generation infrastructure.

[1]  P. Mccarty,et al.  Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications , 2000 .

[2]  J. Schleich,et al.  Determinants of residential water demand in Germany , 2009 .

[3]  C. Matos,et al.  Wastewater and greywater reuse on irrigation in centralized and decentralized systems--an integrated approach on water quality, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  H Siegrist,et al.  Domestic wastewater treatment with a small-scale membrane bioreactor. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  Eran Friedler,et al.  Comparative LCA of decentralized wastewater treatment alternatives for non-potable urban reuse. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Are all membrane reactors equal from an environmental point of view , 2012 .

[7]  Bruce Jefferson,et al.  Greywater recycling: treatment options and applications , 2007 .

[8]  John C. Crittenden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of low impact development technologies combined with conventional centralized water systems for the City of Atlanta, Georgia , 2016, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.

[9]  John C. Crittenden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the City of Atlanta, Georgia’s centralized water system , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Daniel Prats,et al.  Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR , 2010 .

[11]  A. Chapagain,et al.  Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways , 2009 .

[12]  B. Lehner,et al.  Water on an Urban Planet: Urbanization and the Reach of Urban Water Infrastructure , 2014 .

[13]  C revised by John Crittenden,et al.  Water treatment principles and design , 2012 .

[14]  K. Hanaki,et al.  Comparative environmental impacts of source-separation systems for domestic wastewater management in rural China , 2015 .

[15]  Montse Meneses,et al.  Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: treatment alternatives and applications. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[16]  Kate McMordie Stoughton,et al.  Guidelines for Estimating Unmetered Landscaping Water Use , 2010 .

[17]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .

[18]  Jules B van Lier,et al.  Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  Tuomas Mattila,et al.  Comparison of carbon footprints and eutrophication impacts of rural on-site wastewater treatment plants in Finland , 2014 .

[20]  Hilary A. Godwin,et al.  Impacts of Urban Water Conservation Strategies on Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Health: Southern California as a Case Study. , 2016, American journal of public health.

[21]  F. A. Memon,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Greywater Recycling Technologies for New Developments , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[22]  A. Horvath,et al.  Energy and air emission effects of water supply. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  A Joss,et al.  Treatment of toilet wastewater for reuse in a membrane bioreactor. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  F. Castells,et al.  Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: An LCA case study , 2016 .

[25]  Chris Thoeye,et al.  Energy audit of a full scale MBR system , 2010 .

[26]  J.H.J.M. van der Graaf,et al.  Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse , 2006 .

[27]  Stefania Paris,et al.  Greywater recycling in Vietnam — Application of the HUBER MBR process , 2010 .

[28]  Weiwei Mo,et al.  Energy-water nexus analysis of enhanced water supply scenarios: a regional comparison of Tampa Bay, Florida, and San Diego, California. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Jennifer Cooper,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  B Jefferson,et al.  Advanced biological unit processes for domestic water recycling. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  Sadahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation, treatment, and use , 2013 .

[32]  C. Revenga,et al.  Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Waste Not, Want Not: The Potential for Urban Water Conservation in California , 2003 .

[34]  F. Castells,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Urban Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Alternatives , 2011 .

[35]  P. Bocquier WORLD URBANIZATION PROSPECTS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE UN MODEL OF PROJECTION COMPATIBLE WITH URBAN TRANSITION THEORY 1 , 2005 .

[36]  S Meuler,et al.  Membrane bio-reactors for decentralized wastewater treatment and reuse. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  Thorsten Schuetze,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Water Use Efficiency in Urban and Domestic Buildings , 2013 .

[38]  I. Venner,et al.  Energy Efficiency Strategies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities , 2012 .

[39]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[40]  Ivan Muoz,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Supply Plans in Mediterranean Spain , 2010 .

[41]  Simon Judd,et al.  Technologies for domestic wastewater recycling , 2000 .