Functional Categories and Acquisition Orders

We analyzed some earlier studies of English L1 and L2 morpheme orders, basing our analysis on current functional categories theory. Our analysis meets two long-standing charges against morpheme order data; namely, that the heterogeneity of the morphemes does not yield up any insights into L2 acquisition and that the English language-based orders lack generalizability. We suggest that the salient differences between the L1 and the L2 orders reduce to a number of simple contrasts. These involve (a) the category-specific emergence of functional categories in L1 versus their cross-category development in L2; (b) an L2 ordering hinging crucially on the lexical head versus inflectional head distinction in L2 and its absence in L1; (c) the at least coequal, or possibly even spearheading, role that inflections play vis-a-vis free functional categories in L1 versus the earlier and independent emergence of the latter in L2; and (d) the apparently greater difficulty that affix-movement poses for L2 learners.

[1]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[2]  E. Bialystok On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms1 , 1982 .

[3]  Steven Pinker Markedness and Language Development , 1989 .

[4]  D. Larsen-Freeman AN EXPLANATION FOR THE MORPHEME ACQUISITION ORDER OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS , 1976 .

[5]  R BROWN,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF SYNTAX. , 1964, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[6]  Jean-Yves Pollock Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[7]  D. Freeman,et al.  The Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes by Adult ESL Students. , 1975 .

[8]  Lydia White,et al.  Long and Short Verb Movement in Second Language Acquisition , 1992, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[9]  C. Huang,et al.  MOVE WH IN A LANGUAGE WITHOUT WH MOVEMENT , 1982 .

[10]  Fred R. Eckman MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS , 1977 .

[11]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  Introduction: Functional Categories and Verb Placement in Language Development , 1992 .

[12]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  Bilingual first language acquisition : French and German grammatical development , 1994 .

[13]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German , 1993 .

[14]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[15]  T. Stowell Determiners in NP and DP , 1991 .

[16]  Carolyn G. Madden,et al.  IS THERE A “NATURAL SEQUENCE” IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING? , 1974 .

[17]  J. Kimball Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[18]  Eithne Guilfoyle,et al.  Functional Categories and Language Acquisition , 1992, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[19]  R. Andersen AN IMPLICATIONAL MODEL FOR SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH , 1978 .

[20]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Parameterized Grammatical Theory and Language Acquisition , 1988 .

[21]  H. Clahsen Constraints on Parameter Setting: A Grammatical Analysis of Some Acquisition Stages in German Child Language , 1990 .

[22]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  Word Order and Nominative Case in Non-Native Language Acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage , 1994 .

[23]  Fred R. Eckman,et al.  Typological and Parametric Views of Universals in Second Language Acquisition , 1988 .

[24]  J. Berko The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .