Comparison of Speed of Sound Measures Assessed by Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound to Bone Mineral Density Measures Assessed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Large Canadian Cohort: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

[1]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Normative data for multisite quantitative ultrasound: the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study. , 2014, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[2]  Tuan V. Nguyen,et al.  Association between lean mass, fat mass, and bone mineral density: a meta-analysis. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[3]  G. Haïat,et al.  Radial anatomic variation of ultrasonic velocity in human cortical bone. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  J. Hopper,et al.  Fracture risk and height: An association partly accounted for by cortical porosity of relatively thinner cortices , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow‐up: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Thomas Baum,et al.  Increased cortical porosity in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with fragility fractures , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  D. Vashishth,et al.  The relative contributions of non-enzymatic glycation and cortical porosity on the fracture toughness of aging bone. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Heather M. Macdonald,et al.  Age‐related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: A population‐based HR‐pQCT study , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  L. Lix,et al.  Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts , 2011, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  A. Tenenhouse,et al.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: Implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis , 2010, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  J. Kanis,et al.  Development and use of FRAX® in osteoporosis , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  S. Jamal,et al.  Repeat Low‐Trauma Fractures Occur Frequently Among Men and Women Who Have Osteopenic BMD , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  A. Tenenhouse,et al.  Association Between Change in BMD and Fragility Fracture in Women and Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  S. Jamal,et al.  Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[15]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  A. Silman,et al.  Predictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  Paul D. Miller,et al.  Bone Mineral Density Thresholds for Pharmacological Intervention to Prevent Fractures , 2004 .

[18]  J. Reginster,et al.  Relationship Between Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and BMD to Predict Vertebral Fracture Risk , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity Through the Cortex of Phalanges, Radius, and Tibia in Normal and Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women Using a New Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound Device , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[20]  K. Knapp,et al.  Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound: Colles’ Fracture Discrimination in Postmenopausal Women , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  O. Johnell,et al.  Ten Year Probabilities of Osteoporotic Fractures According to BMD and Diagnostic Thresholds , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of bone status using speed of sound at multiple anatomical sites. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  G. M. Blake,et al.  Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound: Precision, Age- and Menopause-Related Changes, Fracture Discrimination, and T-score Equivalence with Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[24]  Ray Fleming,et al.  NIH Consensus Panel Addresses Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy , 2000 .

[25]  M. Rapoport,et al.  Reference Database for Bone Speed of Sound Measurement by a Novel Quantitative Multi-site Ultrasound Device , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  H K Genant,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Research Notes: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): Background, Rationale, Methods , 1999, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[28]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.