In this paper we examine contrasting concepts of literacy in relation to the rehabilitation of offenders under supervision by the probation service. One approach, derived from a linguistic or code-based perspective, delimits literacy to acquiring minimal routines and procedures to function in mainstream society in order to avoid further failure. Critical literacy, in contrast, derived from a socio-cultural perspective, highlights the importance of acquiring literacy as an active, context-grounded process, through which individuals take personal control for accessing wider social, educational and economic opportunities. Arguably, literacy is a fundamental component of any rehabilitation process for offenders and there is evidence that involvement in literacy programmes reduces recidivism, enables offenders to achieve better family relationships, higher levels of self-control and self-esteem, whilst also promoting a sense of social responsibility and inclusion in society. Data are reported from a survey con...
[1]
A. Webster,et al.
Offender literacy and the probation service
,
1998
.
[2]
A. Al-Kahtany.
Literacy from a linguistic and a sociolinguistic perspective
,
1996
.
[3]
David R. Olson,et al.
The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading
,
1996
.
[4]
B. Street.
Literacy in Theory and Practice
,
1984
.
[5]
Linda A. M. Perry,et al.
The Effectiveness of Prison Education Programs
,
1982
.
[6]
J. C. Matheson.
The Criminal Justice Act, 1948
,
1953,
Medico-Legal Journal.
[7]
M. Beveridge,et al.
Managing the Literacy Curriculum: How Schools Can Become Communities of Readers and Writers
,
1996
.