Qualification of imaging biomarkers for oncology drug development.

Although many imaging biomarkers have been described for cancer research, few are sufficiently robust, reliable and well-characterised to be used as routine tools in clinical cancer research. In particular, biomarkers which show that investigational therapies have reduced tumour cell proliferation, or induced necrotic or apoptotic cell death are not commonly used to support decision-making in drug development, even though such pharmacodynamic effects are common goals of many classes of investigational drugs. Moreover we lack well-qualified biomarkers of propensity to metastasise. The qualification and technical validation of imaging biomarkers poses unique challenges not always encountered when validating biospecimen biomarkers. These include standardisation of acquisition and analysis, imaging-pathology correlation, cross-sectional clinical-biomarker correlations and correlation with outcome. Such work is ideally suited to precompetitive research and public-private partnerships, and this has been recognised within the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), a Joint Undertaking between the European Union and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, which has initiated projects in the areas of drug safety, drug efficacy, knowledge management and training.

[1]  David J Collins,et al.  Technology Insight: water diffusion MRI—a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[2]  B. Ross,et al.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Dmitry Soloviev,et al.  [(18)F]FLT: an imaging biomarker of tumour proliferation for assessment of tumour response to treatment. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[4]  G. Parker,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[6]  Ralph Sinkus,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient from magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker in oncology drug development. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[7]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[8]  M. Goldman Reflections on the Innovative Medicines Initiative , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[9]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[10]  James H. Doroshow,et al.  AACR-FDA-NCI Cancer Biomarkers Collaborative Consensus Report: Advancing the Use of Biomarkers in Cancer Drug Development , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Hubert Vesselle,et al.  FLT: measuring tumor cell proliferation in vivo with positron emission tomography and 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  E. Aboagye,et al.  Imaging apoptosis with positron emission tomography: 'bench to bedside' development of the caspase-3/7 specific radiotracer [(18)F]ICMT-11. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[13]  J. Bading,et al.  Imaging of Cell Proliferation: Status and Prospects , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  J R Griffiths,et al.  Clinical studies. , 2005, Advances in pharmacology.

[15]  Lawrence H Schwartz,et al.  18F-FDG PET as a candidate for "qualified biomarker": functional assessment of treatment response in oncology. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  J. Wagner,et al.  Biomarkers and Surrogate End Points for Fit‐for‐Purpose Development and Regulatory Evaluation of New Drugs , 2007, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  L. Wiens,et al.  Validation of FLT uptake as a measure of thymidine kinase-1 activity in A549 carcinoma cells. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  D. DeMets,et al.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.