Ethical Design in the Internet of Things

Even though public awareness about privacy risks in the Internet is increasing, in the evolution of the Internet to the Internet of Things (IoT) these risks are likely to become more relevant due to the large amount of data collected and processed by the “Things”. The business drivers for exploring ways to monetize such data are one of the challenges identified in this paper for the protection of Privacy in the IoT. Beyond the protection of privacy, this paper highlights the need for new approaches, which grant a more active role to the users of the IoT and which address other potential issues such as the Digital Divide or safety risks. A key facet in ethical design is the transparency of the technology and services in how that technology handles data, as well as providing choice for the user. This paper presents a new approach for users’ interaction with the IoT, which is based on the concept of Ethical Design implemented through a policy-based framework. In the proposed framework, users are provided with wider controls over personal data or the IoT services by selecting specific sets of policies, which can be tailored according to users’ capabilities and to the contexts where they operate. The potential deployment of the framework in a typical IoT context is described with the identification of the main stakeholders and the processes that should be put in place.

[1]  Myriam Dunn Cavelty Breaking the Cyber-Security Dilemma: Aligning Security Needs and Removing Vulnerabilities , 2014, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[2]  Christoph Schroth,et al.  The Internet of Things in an Enterprise Context , 2009, FIS.

[3]  Dear Mr Sotiropoulos ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party , 2013 .

[4]  Ricardo Neisse,et al.  A Model-Based Security Toolkit for the Internet of Things , 2014, 2014 Ninth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security.

[5]  George M. Church,et al.  Raw Personal Data: Providing Access , 2014, Science.

[6]  Ricardo Neisse,et al.  Building Trust in the Human?Internet of Things Relationship , 2014, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[7]  George R. Milne,et al.  Internet of Things: Convenience vs. privacy and secrecy , 2015 .

[8]  Philippe Dobbelaere,et al.  Towards abundant DiY service creativity , 2009, 2009 13th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks.

[9]  Ricardo Neisse,et al.  Model-based specification and refinement of usage control policies , 2013, 2013 Eleventh Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust.

[10]  Johann Cas,et al.  Privacy in pervasive computing environments - a contradiction in terms? , 2005, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[11]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  The digital future - A challenge for privacy? , 2015, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[12]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  Internet of things - Governance quo vadis? , 2013, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[13]  Stefan Fenz,et al.  A taxonomy for privacy enhancing technologies , 2015, Comput. Secur..

[14]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Privacy and rationality in individual decision making , 2005, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[15]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  How internet users' privacy concerns have evolved since 2002 , 2010, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[16]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Respecting Context to Protect Privacy: Why Meaning Matters , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[17]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Privacy and Security of Personal Information - Economic Incentives and Technological Solutions , 2004, Economics of Information Security.

[18]  A. Anonymous,et al.  Consumer Data Privacy in a Networked World: A Framework for Protecting Privacy and Promoting Innovation in the Global Digital Economy , 2013, J. Priv. Confidentiality.

[19]  A. McLean,et al.  The Human Condition , 2017, Academic Psychiatry.

[20]  Peter Friess,et al.  Internet of Things Strategic Research Roadmap , 2011 .

[21]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  Governance of ICT Security: A Perspective from the JRC , 2014 .

[22]  Jonathan Cave,et al.  Does it help or hinder? Promotion of Innovation on the Internet and Citizens’ Right to Privacy , 2011 .

[23]  Niels Gottschalk-Mazouz,et al.  Internet and the flow of knowledge: Which ethical and political challenges will we face? , 2013 .

[24]  Ricardo Neisse,et al.  Enforcement of security policy rules for the Internet of Things , 2014, 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[25]  Luigi Alfredo Grieco,et al.  Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[26]  P. Brey,et al.  Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[27]  Ashish Jain,et al.  Privity: Scalable infrastructure for enforcing privacy and security of personal information , 2010, 2010 IEEE 4th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Services Architecture and Application.

[28]  Ricardo Neisse,et al.  A Model-Based Security Toolkit for the Internet of Things , 2014, 2014 Ninth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security.

[29]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Anticipatory Ethics for a Future Internet: Analyzing Values During the Design of an Internet Infrastructure , 2014, Science and Engineering Ethics.