Tracking the 2004 Presidential Campaign Web Sites

This study analyzed the content of news releases posted on the presidential candidate Web sites of George W. Bush and John Kerry during the 2004 election campaign. Findings suggest topics like terrorism and the war in Iraq received significant attention in the news releases, supplanting traditional campaign policy issues such as education, social security, and Medicare. The 2004 online campaign news releases also confirmed the prominence of attack over policy issues in the two major party candidates’ rhetoric. Also, 80% of the news releases posted by George Bush and John Kerry on their campaign Web sites contained an attack against the opposition. Finally, approximately 80% of the overall 2004 online news releases posted by Bush and Kerry on their campaign Web sites contained at least one reference to candidates’ personality traits.

[1]  B. Peters.  American Public Policy: Promise and Performance , 1986 .

[2]  Sharon E. Jarvis.  Partisan patterns in presidential campaign speeches, 1948–2000 , 2004 .

[3]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Campaign '96: A Functional Analysis of Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending , 1998 .

[4]  Audrey A. Haynes,et al.  Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Messages Against Opponents , 1998 .

[5]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Spencer F. Tinkham,et al.  The Sleeper Effect and Negative Political Advertising , 1999 .

[7]  William L. Benoit.  A functional analysis of political advertising across media, 1998 , 2000 .

[8]  Michael Pfau,et al.  Attack Politics: Strategy and Defense , 1990 .

[9]  Robert H. Wicks,et al.  Going Negative: Candidate Usage of Internet Web Sites during the 2000 Presidential Campaign , 2003 .

[10]  William L. Benoit.  Election outcome and topic of political campaign attacks , 2004 .

[11]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates , 1999 .

[12]  Craig Leonard Brians,et al.  Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer? , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[13]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending: A Functional Analysis of U.S. Nominating Convention Keynote Speeches , 2000 .

[14]  John R. Petrocik.  Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study , 1996 .

[15]  For Immediate Release: Candidate Press Releases in American Political Campaigns , 1982 .

[16]  William L. Benoit.  The functional approach to presidential television spots: Acclaiming, attacking, defending 1952–2000 , 2001 .

[17]  B. S. Sonner.  The Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertising: A Case Study , 1998 .

[18]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[19]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Going negative : how attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate , 1995 .

[20]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[21]  P. Kenney,et al.  Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[22]  Joseph R. Dominick,et al.  Mass Media Research: An Introduction , 1983 .

[23]  Nicholas A. Valentino,et al.  Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate? , 1994, American Political Science Review.