Restricted Epidemic Routing in Multi-Community Delay Tolerant Networks

In some specific applicable scenarios, nodes are placed in some geographical areas and limited to move in their own community. We investigate the tradeoff between the delivery delay and the number of transmissions in the above multi-community delay tolerant networks by propagating a data packet in a carefully chosen segment of community. First, three restricted epidemic routings are proposed: the shortest community-hop path scheme, the rectangle scheme, and the parallelogram scheme. Second, the ratios of the average number of communities that can propagate the data packet in the proposed schemes to those that can propagate in the epidemic routing are analyzed. The ratios are found to be small and to decrease with the increase in the number of communities. The tail distribution of the inter-meeting time of any two nodes in the neighboring communities is then demonstrated to be exponential. Third, the delivery delay of the proposed schemes is analyzed by Markovian chain tool. The experiments show that the theoretical model proposed here is reliable, and that the proposed schemes can significantly decrease the number of transmissions, even if these schemes increase the delivery delay to some extent.

[1]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Properties of random direction models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[2]  Matthias Grossglauser,et al.  Age matters: efficient route discovery in mobile ad hoc networks using encounter ages , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[3]  Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos,et al.  Know Thy Neighbor: Towards Optimal Mapping of Contacts to Social Graphs for DTN Routing , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[4]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks , 2003, MOCO.

[5]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[6]  T. Spyropoulos,et al.  Efficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Multiple-Copy Case , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[7]  Guohong Cao,et al.  User-centric data dissemination in disruption tolerant networks , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[8]  Marcelo Dias de Amorim,et al.  The Accordion Phenomenon: Analysis, Characterization, and Impact on DTN Routing , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[9]  Jie Wu,et al.  Social feature-based multi-path routing in delay tolerant networks , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Do Young Eun,et al.  Crossing Over the Bounded Domain: From Exponential to Power-Law Intermeeting Time in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[11]  Pan Hui,et al.  BUBBLE Rap: Social-Based Forwarding in Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  Terry L King A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing , 1997 .

[13]  Ger Koole,et al.  The message delay in mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, Perform. Evaluation.

[14]  J.H. Kim,et al.  Tradeoff between energy consumption and lifetime in Delay-Tolerant mobile Network , 2008, MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[15]  Amos Gilat,et al.  Matlab, An Introduction With Applications , 2003 .

[16]  K. Psounis,et al.  Efficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Single-Copy Case , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  Waylon Brunette,et al.  Data MULEs: modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[18]  Minglu Li,et al.  Impact of Traffic Influxes: Revealing Exponential Intercontact Time in Urban VANETs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[19]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  A new networking model for biological applications of ad hoc sensor networks , 2006, TNET.