The Relative Efficiency of Regression and Simple Unit Predictor Weights in Applied Differential Psychology

A very common problem in the behavioral and social sciences is the prediction of the standing of a person or thing on one variable, usually designated the criterion, from his or its standing on a number of other variables, usually called the predictors. Leastsquared error multiple regression weights are most commonly used in weighting the predictors into a composite. These weights, which minimize, over the cases in the sample, the sum of the squared deviations of the observed from the predicted criterion score, are calculated from the normal equations which express the minimization conditions (Anderson, 1958). The fitting of the regression weights to the idiosyncracies of the initial sample leads to a decrease in effectiveness when these weights are applied to a new sample in which these particular idiosyncracies are not present. This &dquo;shrinkage&dquo; is often substantial in practical situations (e.g., see: Kurtz, 1948; Cureton, 1950; and Kirkpatrick, 1951), especially when the initial sample is small. And small samples, as Lawshe and Schucker (1959) point out, are the rule rather than the exception in many areas of applied psychology. Certain other approaches to the weighting problem produce

[1]  D. Wechsler Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children , 2020, Definitions.

[2]  Douglas W. Bray,et al.  Validation of employment tests for telephone company installation and repair occupations. , 1970 .

[3]  M. Browne A comparison of factor analytic techniques , 1968, Psychometrika.

[4]  P. Herzberg The Parameters of Cross-Validation , 1967 .

[5]  R. B. Ewen Weighing components of job satisfaction. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  E. C. Tupes,et al.  A NOTE ON “VALIDITY AND NONLINEAR HETEROSCEDASTIC MODELS” , 1964 .

[7]  Marvin H. Trattner COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ASSEMBLING APTITUDE TEST BATTERIES , 1963 .

[8]  Martin Greenberger,et al.  Random number generators , 1959, ACM National Meeting.

[9]  A. Wesman,et al.  Multiple Regression vs. Simple Addition of Scores in Prediction of College Grades , 1959 .

[10]  Mervin E. Muller,et al.  A Comparison of Methods for Generating Normal Deviates on Digital Computers , 1959, JACM.

[11]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[12]  C. H. Lawshe,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of four Test Weighting Methods in Multiple Prediction , 1959 .

[13]  A. Kshirsagar Bartlett Decomposition and Wishart Distribution , 1959 .

[14]  M. E. Muller,et al.  A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates , 1958 .

[15]  Francis A. C. Sevier Testing the Assumptions Underlying Multiple Regression , 1957 .

[16]  R. Wijsman Random Orthogonal Transformations and their use in Some Classical Distribution Problems in Multivariate Analysis , 1957 .

[17]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Influence of scale administrator on employee attitude responses. , 1956 .

[18]  D. G. Ryans An Analysis and Comparison of Certain Techniques for Weighting Criterion Data , 1954 .

[19]  O. Taussky,et al.  Generation and testing of pseudo-random numbers , 1954 .

[20]  J. J. Kirkpatrick Cross-validation of a forced-choice personality inventory. , 1951 .

[21]  Edward E. Cureton,et al.  Validity, Reliability, and Baloney , 1950 .

[22]  A. K. Kurtz A Research Test of the Rorschach Test , 1948 .

[23]  D. Adkins Construction and analysis of achievement tests , 1947 .

[24]  H. E. Brogden,et al.  On the interpretation of the correlation coefficient as a measure of predictive efficiency. , 1946, Journal of educational psychology.

[25]  A. J. Phillips Further Evidence Regarding Weighted Versus Unweighted Scoring of Examinations , 1943 .

[26]  George R. Burket,et al.  A study of reduced rank models for multiple prediction , 1943 .

[27]  Jack W. Dunlap,et al.  Derivation and application of a unit scoring system for the strong vocational interest blank for women , 1942 .

[28]  M. Bartlett XX.—On the Theory of Statistical Regression. , 1934 .