Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.

PURPOSE To compare 11 preschool vision screening tests administered by licensed eye care professionals (LEPs; optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists). DESIGN Multicenter, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS A sample (N = 2588) of 3- to 5-year-old children enrolled in Head Start was selected to over-represent children with vision problems. METHODS Certified LEPs administered 11 commonly used or commercially available screening tests. Results from a standardized comprehensive eye examination were used to classify children with respect to 4 targeted conditions: amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and unexplained reduced visual acuity (VA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity for detecting children with > or =1 targeted conditions at selected levels of specificity was the primary outcome measure. Sensitivity also was calculated for detecting conditions grouped into 3 levels of importance. RESULTS At 90% specificity, sensitivities of noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR) (64%), the Retinomax Autorefractor (63%), SureSight Vision Screener (63%), and Lea Symbols test (61%) were similar. Sensitivities of the Power Refractor II (54%) and HOTV VA test (54%) were similar to each other. Sensitivities of the Random Dot E stereoacuity (42%) and Stereo Smile II (44%) tests were similar to each other and lower (P<0.0001) than the sensitivities of NCR, the 2 autorefractors, and the Lea Symbols test. The cover-uncover test had very low sensitivity (16%) but very high specificity (98%). Sensitivity for conditions considered the most important to detect was 80% to 90% for the 2 autorefractors and NCR. Central interpretations for the MTI and iScreen photoscreeners each yielded 94% specificity and 37% sensitivity. At 94% specificity, the sensitivities were significantly better for NCR, the 2 autorefractors, and the Lea Symbols VA test than for the 2 photoscreeners for detecting > or =1 targeted conditions and for detecting the most important conditions. CONCLUSIONS Screening tests administered by LEPs vary widely in performance. With 90% specificity, the best tests detected only two thirds of children having > or =1 targeted conditions, but nearly 90% of children with the most important conditions. The 2 tests that use static photorefractive technology were less accurate than 3 tests that assess refractive error in other ways. These results have important implications for screening preschool-aged children.

[1]  R A Kennedy,et al.  Evaluation of the iScreen digital screening system for amblyogenic factors. , 2000, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[2]  Bruce Moore Od Faao.  Eye Care for Infants and Young Children , 1997 .

[3]  R. Arnold,et al.  The Alaska Blind Child Discovery project: rationale, methods and results of 4000 screenings. , 2000, Alaska medicine.

[4]  D G Altman,et al.  A method for combining matched and unmatched binary data. Application to randomized, controlled trials of photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  Preschool Vision Screening: Summary of a Task Force Report , 2000, Pediatrics.

[6]  Snowdon Sk,et al.  Preschool vision screening. , 1997, Health technology assessment.

[7]  W. Wesemann,et al.  Clinical evaluation of refraction using a handheld wavefront autorefractor in young and adult patients , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  Morris Green,et al.  Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. , 1994 .

[9]  Richard W Hertle,et al.  A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  S M Downs,et al.  A systematic review of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia. , 1999, Pediatrics.

[11]  R A Saunders,et al.  The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  Kurt Simons,et al.  Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome , 1996 .

[13]  R. Ingram.  VISION SCREENING OF CHILDREN , 1980, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Maguire,et al.  A survey of vision screening policy of preschool children in the United States. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[15]  K. S. Morgan,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a commercial photorefractor. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Two infant vision screening programmes: Prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo- and videorefractive screening , 1996, Eye.

[17]  W E Scott,et al.  Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. , 1995, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[18]  T. Leonard-Martin,et al.  Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[19]  H C Howland,et al.  Laboratory, Clinical, and Kindergarten Test of a New Eccentric Infrared Photorefractor (PowerRefractor) , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: II. Sensitivity and specificity of the MTI photoscreener. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[21]  S. El-Defrawy,et al.  Evaluation of a hand-held autorefractor in children younger than 6. , 1998, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[22]  V. Dobson,et al.  Vision Screening of Preschool Children: Evaluating the Past, Looking Toward the Future , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  Junzhong Liang,et al.  Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  M. I. Ehrlich,et al.  Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus. Programs, methods, guidelines, 1983. , 1983, Survey of ophthalmology.

[26]  Roger A. Johnson,et al.  Vision examinations for all children entering public school--the new Kentucky law. , 2003, Optometry.

[27]  R Näsänen,et al.  NEW VISUAL ACUITY TEST FOR PRE‐SCHOOL CHILDREN , 1980, Acta ophthalmologica.