Flow in compound channel with abrupt floodplain contraction

Flooding rivers usually present transition reaches where the floodplain width can significantly vary. The present study focuses on an abrupt floodplain contraction (mean angle 22 degrees) in order to determine whether one-dimensional (1D) models, developed for straight and slightly converging geometry, are equally valid for such a geometry. Experiments on a contraction model were carried out in an asymmetric compound channel flume. Severe mass and momentum transfers from the floodplain towards the main channel were observed, giving rise to a noteworthy transverse slope of the water surface and different head loss gradients in the two subsections. Three 1D models and one 2D simulation were compared to experimental measurements. Each 1D model incorporates a specific approach for the modeling of the momentum exchange at the interface boundary between the main channel and the floodplain. The increase of the lateral mass transfer generates moderate errors on the water level values but significant errors on the discharge distribution. Erroneous results arise because of incorrect estimations of both momentum exchange due to lateral mass transfers and boundary conditions which are imposed by the tested 1D models.

[1]  K. Shiono,et al.  Complex flow mechanisms in compound meandering channels with overbank flow , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Gerard Nicollet,et al.  Écoulements permanents à surface libre en lits composés , 1979 .

[3]  P. R. Wormleaton,et al.  An improved method of calculation for steady uniform flow in prismatic main channel/flood plain sections , 1990 .

[4]  Catherine Wilson,et al.  Comparison of turbulence models for stage-discharge rating curve prediction in reach-scale compound channel flows using two-dimensional finite element methods , 2002 .

[5]  R. H. J. Sellin,et al.  SERC flood channel facility: skewed flow experiments , 1990 .

[6]  P Ackers,et al.  HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF TWO-STAGE CHANNELS , 1992 .

[7]  R. French Open Channel Hydraulics , 1985 .

[8]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  Stage-discharge prediction for rivers in flood applying a depth-averaged model , 2004 .

[9]  Didier Bousmar,et al.  Flow modelling in compound channels : momentum transfer between main channel and prismatic or non-prismatic floodplains , 2002 .

[10]  N. Rivière,et al.  Upstream discharge distribution in compound-channel flumes , 2005 .

[11]  Terry W. Sturm,et al.  Clear‐Water Scour around Abutments in Floodplains , 1994 .

[12]  D. Knight,et al.  Flood Plain and Main Channel Flow Interaction , 1983 .

[13]  Velocity measurements in a concrete experimental channel representing a flood plain , 2002 .

[14]  P. Ackers HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF TWO-STAGE CHANNELS. (WINNER OF 1993 COOPERS HILL WAR MEMORIAL PRIZE). , 1992 .

[15]  Y. Zech,et al.  Momentum transfer for practical flow computation in compound channels , 1999 .

[16]  D. Knight,et al.  Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  R. Sellin,et al.  Behaviour of meandering two-stage channels , 1993 .

[18]  Didier Bousmar,et al.  Overbank flow in symmetrically narrowing floodplains , 2004 .

[19]  Gary W. Brunner,et al.  Flow Transitions in Bridge Backwater Analysis , 1999 .

[20]  B. Yen Open Channel Flow Resistance , 2002 .

[21]  Hasan Kadhem Jasem Flow in two-stage channels with the main channel skewed to the flood plain direction , 1990 .

[22]  D. G. Rhodes,et al.  Velocity and boundary shear in a wide compound duct , 1994 .

[23]  Gary W. Brunner,et al.  HEC-RAS River Analysis System. Hydraulic Reference Manual. Version 1.0. , 1995 .