[A prospective comparison of video colonoscopy and CT colonography in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal cancer].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE It was the aim of this study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of low-dose CT colonography (CTC) with that of optical colonoscopy (OC) in asymptomatic patients undergoing these tests in a screening program for colonic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS 58 patients (mean age 62.6 years) were included. They underwent low dose CTC and, immediately afterwards, colonoscopy. The colonoscopists were unaware of the CTC findings. A "second look" was performed if a lesion seen in CTC had been missed in the first colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 150 lesions were detected and histologically confirmed. 136 were found to be polypoid lesions, classified as either hyperplastic polyps (n = 66) or polyps with intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 70). In the per-patient analysis only 22.4 % of patients had no polypoid lesion, 27.6 % had at least one hyperplastic and 50.0 % had at least one adenomatous lesion. Sensitivity for adenomas of all size categories was calculated 55.7 % for CTC and 92.9 % for OC. This marked difference (both for the detection of individual lesions and the per-patient analyses) does not reach significance in the two-sided McNemar test. CONCLUSIONS There was a high prevalence of lesions with intraepithelial neoplasia in this screening group. OC had a higher sensitivity than CTC in the detection of lesions smaller than 10 mm.

[1]  G. Hoff,et al.  Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best? , 2010, Gut.

[2]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  O. Dominic,et al.  American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008 , 2009, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[5]  A. Aschoff,et al.  [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population]. , 2009, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[6]  J. East Colonoscopy, tumors, and inflammatory bowel disease , 2009, Endoscopy.

[7]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[9]  Stuart A. Taylor,et al.  European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): Consensus statement on CT colonography , 2007, European Radiology.

[10]  D. Rex PRO: Patients with Polyps Smaller Than 1 cm on Computed Tomographic Colonography Should Be Offered Colonoscopy and Polypectomy , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[11]  J. Yee,et al.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. , 2005, Radiology.

[12]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  E. Paulson,et al.  Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison , 2005, The Lancet.

[14]  L. Weinstock,et al.  Patient Preferences for CT Colonography, Conventional Colonoscopy, and Bowel Preparation , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[15]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Aldridge,et al.  Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? , 2001, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[17]  J. Olsen,et al.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test , 1996, The Lancet.

[18]  D J Vining,et al.  Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? , 1996, Radiology.

[19]  S. Moss,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer , 1989, The Lancet.

[20]  S. Stryker,et al.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[21]  R. Pearson Low Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomas More Than 10 Years After Negative Colonoscopy , 2010 .

[22]  A. Aschoff,et al.  CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps , 2005, European Radiology.

[23]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  F. V. von Eyben,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. , 1997, Gastroenterology.