Emergence of Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Comparison of Risks Associated with Different Antipseudomonal Agents

ABSTRACT Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infections. The risk of emergence of antibiotic resistance may vary with different antibiotic treatments. To compare the risks of emergence of resistance associated with four antipseudomonal agents, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin, we conducted a cohort study, assessing relative risks for emergence of resistantP. aeruginosa in patients treated with any of these drugs. A total of 271 patients (followed for 3,810 days) with infections due to P. aeruginosa were treated with the study agents. Resistance emerged in 28 patients (10.2%). Adjusted hazard ratios for the emergence of resistance were as follows: ceftazidime, 0.7 (P = 0.4); ciprofloxacin, 0.8 (P = 0.6); imipenem, 2.8 (P = 0.02); and piperacillin, 1.7 (P = 0.3). Hazard ratios for emergence of resistance to each individual agent associated with treatment with the same agent were as follows: ceftazidime, 0.8 (P = 0.7); ciprofloxacin, 9.2 (P = 0.04); imipenem, 44 (P = 0.001); and piperacillin, 5.2 (P= 0.01). We concluded that there were evident differences among antibiotics in the likelihood that their use would allow emergence of resistance in P. aeruginosa. Ceftazidime was associated with the lowest risk, and imipenem had the highest risk.

[1]  Y. Carmeli,et al.  Health and economic outcomes of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  R. Chioléro,et al.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Imipenem-Cilastatin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Nosocomial Pneumonia or Peritonitis , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  Y. Carmeli,et al.  Imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns. , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  M. Samore,et al.  Molecular epidemiology of acquisition of ceftazidime-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a nonoutbreak setting , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  D. Pittet,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem monotherapy with imipenem plus netilmicin for treatment of severe infections in nonneutropenic patients , 1994, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group , 1994, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  J. Pechère,et al.  Development of resistance during ceftazidime and cefepime therapy in a murine peritonitis model. , 1992, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[8]  B. Yangco,et al.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. , 1989, American journal of infection control.

[9]  J M Hughes,et al.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. , 1988, American journal of infection control.

[10]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[11]  J. Quinn,et al.  Emergence of resistance to imipenem during therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. , 1986, The Journal of infectious diseases.