Pilots psychophysiological condition assesment

Due to increasing safety standards in air transport, the emphasis is put on human factors in this domain. This regards especially the improvement of piloting precision during flight training and the elimination of internal and external influences with negative effect on pilots. This paper is focused on evaluation of pilot’s psychophysiological state during flight training on a simulator and in an aircraft and also on pilot’s reaction on transfer from analogue to digital visual presentation of avionic data. The best indicator for evaluating human’s psychophysiological condition could be a heart rate because of its descriptive activity of human heart and its psychophysiological character based on sympathovagal balance of autonomic nervous system. In this paper heart rate frequency is measured by FlexiGuard biotelemetry mobile device and by a Garmin c  chest belt. This paper is oriented towards description and comparison of the most common methods for physiological parameters assessment, i.e. time and frequency domain analysis and non-parametric methods analysis. The paper also describes a wavelet transform. The results show that not every parameter resulting from each analysis could be a good indicator describing pilot’s stress. Results also show which parameters might work as good indicators of pilot’s stress – those are LF/HF ratio and parameters measured by wavelet transform. Best way to define pilot’s stress on simulators in real time indicates to be wavelet.

[1]  J. Kingsbury The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook: Introductory Theory and Applications in Science, Engineering, Medicine and Finance , 2004 .

[2]  Wolfram Boucsein,et al.  Combining electrodermal responses and cardiovascular measures for probing adaptive automation during simulated flight. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  M. Penhaker,et al.  Biotelemetry system of humans , 2006 .

[4]  Patrik Kutilek,et al.  FlexiGuard: Modular biotelemetry system for military applications , 2015, International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT) 2015.

[5]  A. H. M. Rahmatullah Imon,et al.  A Brief Review of Tests for Normality , 2016 .

[6]  F. Shaffer,et al.  An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms , 2017, Front. Public Health.

[7]  Jakub Kraus,et al.  Determining importance of physiological parameters and methods of their evaluation for classification of pilots psychophysiological condition , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT).

[8]  P. Hoogeboom,et al.  Does the 'silent cockpit' reduce pilot workload? , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[9]  J. Ball,et al.  Statistics review 6: Nonparametric methods , 2002, Critical care.

[10]  G. F. Wilson,et al.  The use of multiple physiological measures to determine flight segment in F4 pilots , 1990, IEEE Conference on Aerospace and Electronics.

[11]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Heart Rate Measures of Flight Test and Evaluation , 2002 .

[12]  Lenka Hanakova,et al.  Study of heart rate as the main stress indicator in aircraft pilots , 2014, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014.