Permanent Deformation Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures by Using Incremental Repeated Load Testing

Currently, flow number (FN) is being used for measuring the permanent deformation resistance of asphalt mixtures. The provisional AASHTO TP 79 test method specifies the requirements of the FN test; however, there are undefined levels of test variables, such as temperature, axial stress, and confinement. Agreeable FN criteria that can reliably discriminate between various mixtures have not been established. As the asphalt industry continues to develop more sophisticated mixtures (warm mix, reclaimed asphalt pavement, and reclaimed asphalt shingles), the FN value has failed to capture the true complexity of the asphalt mixtures. These shortcomings and the unpredictable testing time of the FN test have affected its usefulness for evaluating high-temperature performance of asphalt mixtures. A new test procedure for evaluation of the rutting susceptibility of asphalt mixtures is being proposed. The new procedure is conducted at one temperature and three stresses on the same replicate in three increments of 500 cycles and takes only 25 min to complete. The property of the test is the permanent strain attributable to the last cycle of each test increment (minimum strain rate, MSR). A master curve is developed by plotting the MSR values versus parameter TP, which is a product of temperature and pressure. The MSR master curve represents the unit rutting damage (rut per axle) of asphalt mixtures at any stress and temperature and can be used in the laboratory for material characterization, mix design verification, mixture ranking, or pavement design applications to predict rut depth for project climate and design traffic.

[1]  D. Little PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF BINDER-RICH POLYETHYLENE-MODIFIED ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES (NOVOPHALT) , 1991 .

[2]  Allen W. Hatheway,et al.  Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 3rd edition , 1996 .

[3]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Development of SUPERPAVE High-Temperature Performance Grade (PG) Based on Rutting Damage (With Discussion and Closure) , 2005 .

[4]  P. Anbazhagan,et al.  Characterization of clean and fouled rail track ballast subsurface using seismic surface survey method: Model and field studies , 2011 .

[5]  Matthew W Witczak,et al.  Simple Performance Tests: Summary of Recommended Methods and Database , 2005 .

[6]  Mohamed M El-Basyouny,et al.  Effective Temperature for Analysis of Permanent Deformation and Fatigue Distress on Asphalt Mixtures , 2009 .

[7]  Xicheng Qi,et al.  Time-Dependent Permanent Deformation Models for Asphaltic Mixtures , 1998 .

[9]  S F Brown,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR THE PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS , 1977 .

[10]  K. Kaloush,et al.  Guide on the Selection of Appropriate Laboratory Stress Levels for the Flow Number Test , 2011 .

[11]  W J Kenis,et al.  Predictive design procedures, VESYS users manual : an interim design method for flexible pavements using the VESYS structural subsystem , 1978 .

[12]  Jagannath Mallela,et al.  Calibration of Rutting Models for Structural and Mix Design , 2012 .

[13]  I. Jefferson,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1997 .

[14]  Haleh Azari,et al.  Incremental Repeated Load Permanent Deformation Testing of Asphalt Mixtures , 2012 .

[15]  Joe W Button,et al.  Evaluation of Selected Laboratory Procedures and Development of Databases for HMA , 2005 .

[16]  Christopher John Robinette,et al.  Pavement Design Analysis with 2002 Design Guide Software , 2006 .

[17]  Ramon Bonaquist,et al.  Refining the Simple Performance Tester for Use in Routine Practice , 2008 .

[18]  Hainian Wang,et al.  Determination of Flow Number in Asphalt Mixtures from Deformation Rate during Secondary State , 2011 .