The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.

Since its discovery in the 1960s, the P300 has been contributing both directly and indirectly to language research. Perhaps most notably, it has been suggested that the P600, an ERP component that was first characterized in the context of syntactic processing, could be a variant of the P3b subcomponent of the P300. Here, we review studies on both sides of the debate. We also review the "semantic P600," a positivity with a similar time course and distribution to the P600 seen for syntactic manipulations but that is obtained in response to some types of semantic anomalies. Because most current theories of the P600 try to account for both the syntactic and the semantic variant, linking the syntactic P600 to the P3b might also imply a similar link for the semantic P600. However, we describe emerging research in our lab that casts doubt on the idea that the syntactic P600 and the semantic P600 are the same effect. We argue that grouping ERP responses primarily by domain (language vs. nonlanguage) is likely to be misleading and suggest alternative ways of determining whether ERP effects reflect similar or different processing mechanisms.

[1]  M. Fabiani It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: a psychophysiologist's view of cognitive aging. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[2]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Individual differences in P3 scalp distribution in older adults, and their relationship to frontal lobe function. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[6]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[7]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  E Donchin,et al.  Averaged evoked potentials and intramodality selective attention. , 1967, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  V S Johnston,et al.  The relationship between menstrual phase and the P3 component of ERPs. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[11]  C. Phillips,et al.  No semantic illusions in the “Semantic P600” phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2013, Brain Research.

[12]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  It’s All in the Family , 2015, Psychological science.

[13]  D. Tanner,et al.  Individual Differences in the Real-Time Neural Dynamics of Language Comprehension , 2018 .

[14]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing , 2016, Cognitive science.

[16]  D Friedman,et al.  An overview of age-related changes in the scalp distribution of P3b. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 and the menstrual cycle. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. , 1976, Behavioral biology.

[19]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[20]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[23]  M. Kutas,et al.  Parafoveal N400 effect during sentence reading , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[25]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Human brain potentials reveal similar processing of non-linguistic abstract structure and linguistic syntactic structure , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  C. Richard Clark,et al.  Enlarged frontal P300 to stimulus change in panic disorder , 1996, Biological Psychiatry.

[27]  Janet G. van Hell,et al.  Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[28]  R. Seidl,et al.  A taurine and caffeine-containing drink stimulates cognitive performance and well-being , 2000, Amino Acids.

[29]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[30]  Vicka R. Corey,et al.  On the Language Specificity of the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Is the Syntactic Positive Shift a Member of the P300 Family? , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[32]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Language of the Aging Brain: Event-Related Potential Studies of Comprehension in Older Adults , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[33]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[34]  ROBERT M. CHAPMAN,et al.  Evoked Responses to Numerical and Non-Numerical Visual Stimuli while Problem Solving , 1964, Nature.

[35]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Polich,et al.  Meta-analysis of P300 and schizophrenia: patients, paradigms, and practical implications. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[37]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[38]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[39]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[41]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Joachim Röschke,et al.  A Confirmatory Study on the Mechanisms Behind Reduced P300 Waves in Depression , 2003, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[43]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[44]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Getting a cue before getting a clue: Event-related potentials to inference in visual narrative comprehension , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Syntactic processing with aging: an event-related potential study. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[49]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Age-related shifts in hemispheric dominance for syntactic processing. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[50]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit , 2009, Neuroreport.

[51]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[52]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[53]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[55]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[59]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Complement Coercion , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[61]  A. Friederici,et al.  Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[62]  Kim Ainsworth-Darnell,et al.  Dissociating Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998 .

[63]  Neil Cohn,et al.  The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned , 2014, Brain and Language.

[65]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[66]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[67]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[68]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .

[69]  S A Hillyard,et al.  P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[70]  M. Hansenne,et al.  Le potentiel évoqué cognitif P300 (I) : aspects théorique et psychobiologique , 2000, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[71]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Differential Electrophysiological Signatures of Semantic and Syntactic Scene Processing , 2013, Psychological science.

[72]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[73]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[74]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[75]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[76]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[77]  C. Phillips,et al.  Examining the evidence for an independent semantic analyzer: An ERP study in Spanish , 2012, Brain and Language.

[78]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[79]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[80]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[81]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[83]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[84]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural origins of the P300. , 2000, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[85]  Monica Fabiani,et al.  Putting things into perspective: individual differences in working-memory span and the integration of information. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[86]  D. Tanner,et al.  ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[87]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  J. Polich Neuropsychology of P300 , 2011 .

[89]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[90]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[91]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[92]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[93]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  About Edible Restaurants: Conflicts between Syntax and Semantics as Revealed by ERPs , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[94]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[95]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  K. Morita,et al.  Effects of caffeine on event‐related potentials: Comparison of oddball with single‐tone paradigms , 1996, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.