Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments

Contents: Preface. Introduction. Part I: Historical Backgrounds. Analytic, Dialectic and Rhetoric. Analysis of Fallacies, Controversy, and Discussion. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric. Toulmin's Model of Argumentation. Part II: Contemporary Developments. Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. Communication and Rhetoric. Fallacies and Formal Logic. Dialogue Logic and Formal Dialectics. Pragma-Dialectics and Critical Discussion. Language-Oriented Approaches to Argumentation. Other Significant Developments.

[1]  O. Sjaastad.  Epilogue , 1891, The Hospital.

[2]  G. Baker,et al.  The Principles Of Argumentation , 1895 .

[3]  Mary Yost.  Argument from the point‐of‐view of sociology , 1917 .

[4]  William B. Borgers.  DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .

[5]  J. Locke.  An Essay concerning Human Understanding , 1924, Nature.

[6]  A. C. Baird.  Public discussion and debate , 1928 .

[7]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method , 1934, Nature.

[8]  Essentials of debate , 1937 .

[9]  Harry M. Hubbell,et al.  De Inventione; De Optimo Genere Oratorum; Topica , 1949 .

[10]  M MckayElizabeth,et al.  An Examination Of The Place Of Reason In Ethics , 1950 .

[11]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  Act and Person in Argument , 1951, Ethics.

[12]  Arne Naess,et al.  Interpretation and preciseness : a contribution to the theory of communication , 1953 .

[13]  R. Cunningham.  Logic: The Art of Defining and Reasoning , 1953 .

[14]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[15]  Abriss der Geschichte der Logik , 1959 .

[16]  J. C. Cooley.  On Mr. Toulmin's Revolution in Logic , 1959 .

[17]  Methods and Criteria of Reasoning , 1959 .

[18]  H. Castañeda.  On a Proposed Revolution in Logic , 1960, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  M. Wartofsky,et al.  Fallacy : the counterfeit of argument , 1960 .

[20]  The Re-Discovery of the “Topics”: Professor Toulmin’s Inference-Warrants , 1960 .

[21]  G. C. Nerlich.  THE USE OF REASON , 1960 .

[22]  G. B. Keene.  A FIRST COURSE IN MODERN LOGIC , 1960 .

[23]  In Defense of Formal Logic , 1961 .

[24]  Robert H. Ennis.  A Concept of Critical Thinking. , 1962 .

[25]  M. Bartlett,et al.  Probability and Induction , 1962, Nature.

[26]  L. D. Rijk.  On the twelfth century theories of fallacy , 1962 .

[27]  Melvin L. Wulf.  Argument , 1963, Social Service Review.

[28]  Douglas W. Ehninger,et al.  Decision by debate , 1963 .

[29]  H. L. A. Hart,et al.  The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument , 1963 .

[30]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[31]  Joseph L. Cowan.  II.—THE USES OF ARGUMENT—AN APOLOGY FOR LOGIC , 1964 .

[32]  J. W. Cleary,et al.  Rhetoric and public address : a bibliography, 1947-1961 , 1964 .

[33]  T. Viehweg.  Topik und Jurisprudenz : ein Beitrag zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Grundlagenforschung , 1965 .

[34]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic I , 1965 .

[35]  Rhetoric and public address: A bibliography, 1947–1961 , 1965 .

[36]  R. Montague.  PHILOSOPHY, RHETORIC AND ARGUMENTATION , 1966 .

[37]  G. Ryle,et al.  The concept of mind. , 2004, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[38]  Edward P. J. Corbett.  Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student , 1966 .

[39]  C. I. Hovland.  The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[40]  The comparative advantages case , 1967 .

[41]  Robert L. Scott,et al.  On viewing rhetoric as epistemic , 1967 .

[42]  C. David Mortensen,et al.  Logic and marketplace argumentation , 1967 .

[43]  Gidon Gottlieb.  The Logic Of Choice: An Investigation of the Concepts of Rule and Rationality , 1968 .

[44]  Arne Naess,et al.  Communication and argument : elements of applied semantics , 1968 .

[45]  Jimmie D. Trent.  Toulmin's model of an argument: An examination and extension , 1968 .

[46]  W. D. Hudson.  The is-ought question: A collection of papers on the central problems in moral philosophy, , 1969 .

[47]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[48]  G. Cronkhite,et al.  Persuasion: Speech and Behavioral Change. , 1969 .

[49]  Heinrich Lausberg,et al.  Elementi di retorica , 1969 .

[50]  Ray D. Dearin.  The philosophical basis of Chaim Perelman's theory of rhetoric , 1969 .

[51]  D. Ehninger.  Argument as method: Its nature, its limitations and its uses , 1970 .

[52]  Alex C. Michalos.  Improving Your Reasoning , 1970 .

[53]  R. Botha.  The Methodological Status of Grammatical Argumentation , 1970 .

[54]  Donald C. Bryant,et al.  SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION , 1970 .

[55]  Rechtslogik : Versuch einer Anwendung moderner Logik auf das juristische Denken , 1970 .

[56]  J. Delia.  The Logic Fallacy, Cognitive Theory, and the Enthymeme: A Search for the Foundations of Reasoned Discourse. , 1970 .

[57]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[58]  Beyond the Orthodox: The Criteria Case , 1971 .

[59]  C. Wellman,et al.  Challenge and Response: Justification in Ethics , 1971 .

[60]  K. R. Wallace.  Topoi and the problem of invention , 1972 .

[61]  E. Glaser.  An Experiment in Development of Critical Thinking , 1942 .

[62]  John Corcoran,et al.  Completeness of an ancient logic , 1972, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[63]  Wayne Brockriede.  Arguers as Lovers. , 1972 .

[64]  The Rhetorica ad Herennium , 1973 .

[65]  Ruth E. Chambers.  Topics , 1973, Seminars in Perinatology.

[66]  A. Lichtman.  The Alternative-Justification Affirmative: A New Case Form. , 1973 .

[67]  R. Swinburne.  OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH , 1973 .

[68]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  Wittgenstein's Vienna , 1973 .

[69]  The Goal Case Affirmative: An Alternative Approach to Academic Debate. , 1973 .

[70]  Wayne Brockriede.  Rhetorical criticism as argument , 1974 .

[71]  M. Sachs.  Objective Knowledge , 1974 .

[72]  E. M. Barth,et al.  The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy: A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures , 1974 .

[73]  The jurisprudents analogy: Argumentation and the new rhetoric , 1974 .

[74]  Maurice A. Finocchiaro,et al.  "The Concept of" Ad Hominem "Argument in Galileo and Locke" , 1974 .

[75]  John Woods,et al.  Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. , 1974 .

[76]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[77]  Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent , 1974 .

[78]  Wayne Brockriede,et al.  Where Is Argument , 1975 .

[79]  L. Åqvist,et al.  A new approach to the logical theory of interrogatives : analysis and formalization , 1975 .

[80]  Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse : Semiotik, Linguistik, Rhetorik , 1975 .

[81]  J. Delia,et al.  The Development of Functional Persuasive Skills in Childhood and Early Adolescence. , 1976 .

[82]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  The semantics of questions and the questions of semantics: Case studies in the interrelations of logic, semantics and syntax , 1976 .

[83]  A. Scult.  Perelman's universal audience: One perspective , 1976 .

[84]  T. Farrell.  Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory , 1976 .

[85]  P. Heath,et al.  Literary Science as a Science of Argument , 1976 .

[86]  Charles Arthur Willard,et al.  On the utility of descriptive diagrams for the analysis and criticism of arguments , 1976 .

[87]  J. Anscombre,et al.  L'argumentation dans la langue , 1976 .

[88]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[89]  D. O’Keefe.  Two Concepts of Argument. , 1977 .

[90]  Studying deductive logic , 1977 .

[91]  J. Delia,et al.  Cognitive Complexity, Social Perspective-Taking, and Functional Persuasive Skills in Second- to Ninth-Grade Children , 1977 .

[92]  Stephen Toulmin,et al.  Knowing and acting : an invitation to philosophy , 1977 .

[93]  Wayne Brockriede.  Characteristics of Arguments and Arguing. , 1977 .

[94]  Else M. Barth,et al.  Argumentum ad hominem: From chaos to formal dialectic , 1977 .

[95]  Dale Hample,et al.  The Toulmin Model and the Syllogism , 1977 .

[96]  Dale Hample.  Testing a Model of Value Argument and Evidence. , 1977 .

[97]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Logical Self-Defense , 1977 .

[98]  P. Huby.  Posterior Analytics I , 1977, The Classical Review.

[99]  Pragmatik der juristischen Argumentation : was Gesetze anrichten und was rechtens ist , 1977 .

[100]  Ilmar Tammelo.  Modern Logic in the Service of Law , 1978 .

[101]  E. Goody.  Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction , 1978 .

[102]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  Formele3 dialectiek : instrumenten ter beslechting van conflicten over geuite meningen , 1978 .

[103]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[104]  Argument as Non-Discursive Symbolism , 1978 .

[105]  Robert J. Fogelin.  Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic , 1980 .

[106]  C. Willard.  A Reformulation of the Concept of Argument: The Constructivist/Interactionist Foundations of a Sociology of Argument , 1978 .

[107]  Erik C. W. Krabbe.  The adequacy of material dialogue-games , 1978, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[108]  John W. Ray.  Perelman's universal audience , 1978 .

[109]  On Argument and Diagrams. , 1978 .

[110]  Dale Hample.  Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims , 1978 .

[111]  Heinrich F. Plett.  Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse , 1979 .

[112]  Joseph W. Wenzel.  Jürgen Habermas and the Dialectical Perspective on Argumentation , 1979 .

[113]  J. Searle.  Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[114]  Ch. Perelman.  The Rational and The Reasonable , 1979 .

[115]  Jim D. Mackenzie,et al.  Question-begging in non-cumulative systems , 1979, J. Philos. Log..

[116]  Predicting belief and belief change using a cognitive theory of argument and evidence , 1979 .

[117]  Dale Hample.  Motives in Law: An Adaptation of Legal Realism. , 1979 .

[118]  N. Rescher,et al.  Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. , 1979 .

[119]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Game-theoretical semantics : essays on semantics , 1979 .

[120]  Ch. Perelman.  The new rhetoric: A theory of practical reasoning , 1979 .

[121]  Jim D. Mackenzie,et al.  How to stop talking to tortoises , 1979, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[122]  Ruth Anne Clark,et al.  TOPOI and rhetorical competence , 1979 .

[123]  J. Hintikka,et al.  Information-seeking dialogues: Some of their logical properties , 1979 .

[124]  B. Burleson.  On the Analysis and Criticism of Arguments: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[125]  The Philosophy of Pluralism and The New Rhetoric , 1979 .

[126]  Paradigms and Problems: Alternative Constructivist/Interactionist Implications for Argumentation Theory , 1979 .

[127]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  Justice, law, and argument , 1980 .

[128]  M. Finocchiaro.  Galileo and the Art of Reasoning , 1980 .

[129]  Paolo Valesio.  Novantiqua: Rhetorics as a Contemporary Theory , 1980 .

[130]  Schriften zur juristischen Logik , 1980 .

[131]  Oswald Ducrot,et al.  Les échelles argumentatives , 1980 .

[132]  Dale Hample.  A Cognitive View of Argument. , 1980 .

[133]  Argument: A Guide to Formal and Informal Debate , 1980 .

[134]  The nature of argument , 1980 .

[135]  The Logic of Policy Dispute. , 1980 .

[136]  The Place of Non-Discursive Symbolism, Formal Characterizations, and Hermeneutics in Argument Analysis and Criticism. , 1980 .

[137]  S. Jackson,et al.  Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme , 1980 .

[138]  The New Rhetoric as a Philosophical System , 1980 .

[139]  Richard E. Nisbett,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement , 1981 .

[140]  D. Smith.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature , 1981 .

[141]  Gerald J. Massey.  The Fallacy behind Fallacies , 1981 .

[142]  Wilfrid S. Sellars.  Mental events , 1981 .

[143]  J. Anthony Blair,et al.  Informal Logic : The First International Symposium , 2003 .

[144]  Sally Jackson,et al.  The Collaborative Production of Proposals in Conversational Argument and Persuasion: A Study of Disagreement Regulation , 1981 .

[145]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation. , 1981 .

[146]  B. Burleson.  A cognitive‐developmental perspective on social reasoning processes , 1981 .

[147]  Dieter Wunderlich.  Grundlagen der Linguistik , 1981 .

[148]  Rethinking Counterplans: A Reconciliation with Debate Theory. , 1981 .

[149]  Toulmin`s Bold Experiment , 1981 .

[150]  J. Mackenzie.  The dialectics of logic , 1981 .

[151]  Arguing Value Propositions. , 1981 .

[152]  Dale Hample.  The cognitive context of argument , 1981 .

[153]  Lisa S. Ede.  Rhetoric versus philosophy: The role of the universal audience in Chaim Perelman's The New Rhetoric , 1981 .

[154]  H. Geissner.  Rhetorik und politische Bildung , 1981 .

[155]  D. Infante.  Trait argumentativeness as a predictor of communicative behavior in situations requiring argument , 1981 .

[156]  Merrill B. Hintikka,et al.  Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Toward a Theory of Information-Seeking Through Questioning , 1982 .

[157]  David Zarefsky,et al.  Persistent Questions in the Theory of Argument Fields , 1982 .

[158]  D. Holdcroft.  Expression and Meaning. , 1982 .

[159]  M. Meyer.  Argumentation in the Light of a Theory of Questioning , 1982 .

[160]  Lauri Carlson.  Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis , 1982 .

[161]  Erik C. W. Krabbe.  Essentials of the Dialogical Treatment of Quantifiers , 1982 .

[162]  E. Krabbe.  Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation , 1982 .

[163]  J. Cox.  The die is cast: Topical and ontological dimensions of the locus of the irreparable , 1982 .

[164]  Gricean Inference Revisited , 1982, Pragmatics and Philosophy – III.

[165]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Personality and Persuasibility , 1982 .

[166]  Robert C. Rowland,et al.  The Influence of Purpose on Fields of Argument , 1982 .

[167]  E. M. Barth.  A Normative-Pragmatical Foundation of the Rules of some Systems of Formal 3 Dialectics , 1982 .

[168]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change , 1982 .

[169]  Carl H. Heidrich.  Montague-Grammars for Argumentative Dialogues , 1982 .

[170]  D. Annis.  Critical Thinking and Education , 1982 .

[171]  D. O’Keefe.  The concepts of argument and arguing , 1982 .

[172]  Charles Arthur Willard.  Argumentation and the social grounds of knowledge , 1982 .

[173]  G. Thomas Goodnight,et al.  The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation , 1982 .

[174]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[175]  The Eudemian Ethics , 1983 .

[176]  Charles F. Kielkopf.  Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies , 1983 .

[177]  L'analyse textuelle : méthode, exercices , 1983 .

[178]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts , 1983 .

[179]  J. Hintikka,et al.  The game of language : studies in game-theoretical semantics and its applications , 1983 .

[180]  Denis Miéville,et al.  Essai de logique naturelle , 1983 .

[181]  Henwood,et al.  Author index , 1983, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[182]  Extended Arguments in Children's Discourse. , 1983 .

[183]  Paul Lorenzen,et al.  Logical Propaedeutic: Pre-School of Reasonable Discourse , 1984 .

[184]  J. Makau.  The supreme court and reasonableness , 1984 .

[185]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[186]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  The Study of Argumentation. , 1984 .

[187]  Paul Lorenzen,et al.  Normative logic and ethics , 1984 .

[188]  John C. Reinard.  The Role of Toulmin's Categories of Message Development in Persuasive Communication: Two Experimental Studies on Attitude Change , 1984 .

[189]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Logical dialogue-games and fallacies , 1984 .

[190]  Richard D. Rieke,et al.  Argumentation and the decision making process , 1984 .

[191]  Poetica e retorica , 1984 .

[192]  Het identificeren van enkelvoudige argumentatie. , 1984 .

[193]  Perry Weddle.  McPeck's Critical Thinking and Education , 1984 .

[194]  Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information , 1984 .

[195]  A Note on the Range and Utility of the Universal Audience , 1985 .

[196]  E. Schiappa.  Dissociation in the Arguments of Rhetorical Theory , 1985 .

[197]  Perelman on Analogy , 1985 .

[198]  W. E. Wiethoff.  Critical Perspectives on Perelman's Philosophy of Legal Argument , 1985 .

[199]  J. M. Atkinson.  Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[200]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  Noncumulative dialectical models and formal dialectics , 1985, J. Philos. Log..

[201]  Richard Paul,et al.  McPeck's Mistakes , 1985 .

[202]  C. Segre.  Avviamento all'analisi del testo letterario , 1985 .

[203]  D. Walton.  Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation, and Fallacy , 1985 .

[204]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[205]  T. Govier.  A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[206]  Two-Phase Epistemology and Models for Dialogue Logic , 1985, Philosophica.

[207]  J. B. Freeman.  Dialectical Situations and Argument Analysis , 1985 .

[208]  Parlamentarische Rhetorik und Argumentation : Untersuchungen zum Sprachgebrauch des 1. Vereinigten Landtags in Berlin 1847 , 1986 .

[209]  Nancy Dunbar.  Laetrile: A Case Study of a Public Controversy , 1986 .

[210]  A Practical Reasoning Approach to Legal Doctrine , 1986 .

[211]  Joseph J. Pilotta,et al.  Practical reasoning in human affairs : studies in honor of Chaim Perelman , 1986 .

[212]  Linda L. Putnam.  The Evolution of Case Arguments in Teachers' Bargaining. , 1986 .

[213]  D. T. Hughes,et al.  The Rational and the Reasonable: Dialectic or Parallel Systems? , 1986 .

[214]  J. Etchemendy.  The Concept of Logical Consequence , 1991 .

[215]  An Axiological Analysis of Chaim Perelman’s Theory of Practical Reasoning , 1986 .

[216]  Richard D. Rieke.  The Evolution of Judicial Justification: Perelman’s Concept of the Rational and the Reasonable , 1986 .

[217]  J. L. Golden.  The Universal Audience Revisited , 1986 .

[218]  Anthony L. Blair,et al.  Comments on Frans van Eemeren: ‘Dialectical analysis as a normative reconstruction of argumentative discourse’ , 1986 .

[219]  Are Fallacies Common? A Look at Two Debates , 1986 .

[220]  Carroll C. Arnold.  Implications of Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation for Theory of Persuasion , 1986 .

[221]  D. Nimmo,et al.  THE TEFLON PRESIDENT: THE RELEVANCE OF CHAIM PERELMAN'S FORMULATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION , 1986 .

[222]  M. Meyer,et al.  De la problematologie? Philosophie, science et langage , 1986 .

[223]  THE CONCRETE-UNIVERSAL: A SOCIAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION FOR THE NEW RHETORIC , 1986 .

[224]  PERELMAN ON JUSTICE AND POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS , 1986 .

[225]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Dialectical analysis as a normative reconstruction of argumentative discourse , 1986 .

[226]  T. Farrell.  Reason and Rhetorical Practice: The Inventional Agenda of Chaim Perelman , 1986 .

[227]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  A theory of modal dialectics , 1986, J. Philos. Log..

[228]  The Ideology of Freedom's "Fragility" in American Foreign Policy Argument. , 1987 .

[229]  21 Some Remarks on the Development of Argumentation , 1987 .

[230]  37 Toulmin's Theory and the Dynamics of Argumentation , 1987 .

[231]  4 Types of Argument and the Critical Reader , 1987 .

[232]  Creative reasoning in formal discussion , 1987 .

[233]  M. Lipman.  Critical Thinking: What can it be? , 1987 .

[234]  D. Bassano,et al.  La fonction argumentative des marques de la langue , 1987 .

[235]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Argumentation : Perspectives and Approaches , 1987 .

[236]  T. Govier.  Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation , 2018 .

[237]  Donald N. McCloskey,et al.  Rhetoric Of The Human Sciences: Language And Argument In Scholarship And Public Affairs , 1987 .

[238]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Conversational Relevance: Three Experiments on Pragmatic Connectedness in Conversation , 1987 .

[239]  R. Loui,et al.  Change in View , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[240]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Argumentation: across the lines of discipline. , 1987 .

[241]  Perelman's Universal Audience as Critical Tool. , 1987 .

[242]  Ralph H. Johnson.  The blaze of her splendors: Suggestions about revitalizing fallacy theory , 1987 .

[243]  Lita Lundquist.  7 Towards a Procedural Analysis of Argumentative Operators in Texts , 1987 .

[244]  How Common Are Fallacies , 1987 .

[245]  Richard W. Paul.  Chapter 35. Critical Thinking in the Strong Sense and The Role of Argumentation in Everyday Life , 1987 .

[246]  M. Kienpointner.  Chapter 24. Towards a Typology of Argumentative Schemes , 1987 .

[247]  Chapter 34. Argumentation in English and Finnish Editorials , 1987 .

[248]  S. Jacobs.  Chapter 20. The Management of Disagreement in Conversation , 1987 .

[249]  5 Sequences with Concessive, Adversative, and Restrictive Sentences and Clauses and The Simulation of Dialogical Argumentation Patterns in Monological Discourse , 1987 .

[250]  Argumentation: Analysis and Practices. , 1987 .

[251]  9 Negotiating Consensus in Discourse Interaction Schemata , 1987 .

[252]  36 The Argumentation of Self in Job- Interviews , 1987 .

[253]  Marcelo Dascal,et al.  20 The Art of Moving and the Art of Proving , 1987 .

[254]  Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches , 1987 .

[255]  41 The External Justification of a Dialectical Consensus , 1987 .

[256]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[257]  Patricia Riley,et al.  16 Argument in the Law: The Special Case of the Small Claims Court , 1987 .

[258]  Chapter 16. The Function of Argumentation: A Pragmatic Approach , 1987 .

[259]  D. Rosseinsky.  Fearful symmetry , 1987, Nature.

[260]  C. Lumer.  The disputation — a special type of cooperative argumentative dialogue , 1988 .

[261]  茂木 惣兵衛,et al.  The history of political theory , 1988 .

[262]  Can There Be Non-Rhetorical Argumentation? , 1988 .

[263]  H. Price.  Change in View: Principles of Reasoning , 1988 .

[264]  Argumentation analysis: a Dutch counter-balance. , 1988 .

[265]  V. Adelswärd.  Styles of success : On impression management as collaborative action in job interviews , 1988 .

[266]  Through a Glass Darkly: Validity Standards and the Debate over Nuclear Strategic Doctrine. , 1988 .

[267]  Dire et contredire , 1988 .

[268]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning , 1988 .

[269]  Aristotle, the Fallacy of Accident, and the Nature of Predication: A Historical Inquiry , 1988 .

[270]  Zur Logik von Alltagsargumentationen , 1988 .

[271]  Barbara J. O'Keefe,et al.  The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication , 1988 .

[272]  H. Siegel.  Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education , 1988 .

[273]  The rhetorical foundation of philosophical argumentation , 1988 .

[274]  Per Linell,et al.  Discourse of blame: Courtroom construction of social identity from the perspective of the defendant , 1988 .

[275]  Josef Kopperschmidt.  Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse , 1989 .

[276]  Relevance and argumentation: How bald can you get , 1989 .

[277]  Fallacies are Common , 1989 .

[278]  Jacques Jayez,et al.  Problems of context and knowledge , 1989 .

[279]  Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs. Studies in Honor of Chaim Perelman, James L. Golden and Joseph J. Pilotta (eds.) , 1989 .

[280]  S. Jacobs.  Speech acts and arguments , 1989 .

[281]  J. Wisse.  Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero , 1989 .

[282]  Barbara Warnick,et al.  Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument , 1989 .

[283]  Conversation, relevance, and argumentation , 1989 .

[284]  A transition stage in the theory of fallacies , 1989 .

[285]  Marie-Jeanne Borel.  3. Norms in Argumentation and Natural Logic , 1989 .

[286]  Robert Maier.  4. Natural Logic and Norms in Argumentation , 1989 .

[287]  Lawrence J. Prelli,et al.  A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse , 1989 .

[288]  Inge Egner.  The role of topos in the use of a Wobe particle , 1989 .

[289]  Richard Paul,et al.  Critical thinking in North America: A new theory of knowledge, learning, and literacy , 1989 .

[290]  Nancy S. Struever.  The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences , 1989 .

[291]  O. Ducrot,et al.  Argumentativity and Informativity , 1989 .

[292]  H. Kellner.  Language and Historical Representation , 1989 .

[293]  Robert H. Ennis,et al.  Evaluating Critical Thinking , 1989 .

[294]  Jacques Moeschler,et al.  Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance , 1989 .

[295]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  The Role of Logic in Argumentation , 1989 .

[296]  S. Toulmin.  Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .

[297]  Jim D. Mackenzie,et al.  Four dialogue systems , 1990, Stud Logica.

[298]  Mark Weinstein,et al.  Towards a Research Agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking , 1990 .

[299]  Victor Balowitz,et al.  The Dialogue of Reason , 1990 .

[300]  Hans V. Hansen,et al.  An Informal Logic Bibliography , 1990 .

[301]  J. Habermas.  Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[302]  Perhaps by Skill Alone , 1990 .

[303]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[304]  R. Wodak.  "Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter!" : diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus , 1990 .

[305]  Richard D. Rieke,et al.  Communication in Legal Advocacy , 2022 .

[306]  Herbert W. Simons,et al.  The rhetorical turn : invention and persuasion in the conduct of inquiry , 1990 .

[307]  Mark Weinstein.  Towards an account of argumentation in science , 1990 .

[308]  J. Barnes.  The Prior Analytics , 1990, The Classical Review.

[309]  Eveline T. Feteris,et al.  Conditions and Rules for Rational Discussion in a Legal Process: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. , 1990 .

[310]  Robert James Branham.  Debate and Critical Analysis: The Harmony of Conflict , 1991 .

[311]  Robert Alexy.  Theorie der juristischen Argumentation , 1991 .

[312]  Thema's in de Taalbeheersing , 1991 .

[313]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .

[314]  Objets de discours et représentation , 1991 .

[315]  Proof and Explanation the Virginia Lectures , 1991 .

[316]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective. , 1991 .

[317]  David A. Conway.  On the Distinction between Convergent and Linked Arguments , 1991 .

[318]  H. Johnstone,.  Philosophy and Argument , 1991 .

[319]  Opérateurs et connecteurs argumentatifs : une approche psycholinguistique , 1991 .

[320]  Scienza e retorica , 1991 .

[321]  Roger Smook.  Good Reasoning Matters , 1991 .

[322]  R. Harris.  Rhetoric of Science. , 1991 .

[323]  David Goodwin,et al.  Distinction, Argumentation, and the Rhetorical Construction of the Real , 1991 .

[324]  Evaluating Arguments: The Premise-Conclusion Relation , 1991 .

[325]  Chapter 26. Argument Communities: a Quest for Distinctions , 1992 .

[326]  Chapter 25. The Arguer in Interpersonal Argument: Pros and Cons of Individual-Level Analysis , 1992 .

[327]  Argumentation und Konfliktaustragung in Äußerungen über den Golfkrieg , 1992 .

[328]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Readings in Argumentation , 1992 .

[329]  Shi-xu.  Argumentation, explanation, and social cognition , 1992 .

[330]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[331]  Chapter 9. Characteristics of Arguing from a Social Actor’s Perspective , 1992 .

[332]  M. A. van Rees,et al.  The adequacy of speech act theory for explaining conversational phenomena: A response to some conversation analytical critics , 1992 .

[333]  A. Herbig.  "Sie argumentieren doch scheinheilig!" : sprach- und sprechwissenschaftliche Aspekte einer Stilistik des Argumentierens , 1992 .

[334]  Chapter 10. Generic Characteristics of Argumentation in Everyday Discourse , 1992 .

[335]  WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT , 1992 .

[336]  Snoeck Henkemans,et al.  Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion , 1992 .

[337]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reasoning and the logic of things , 1992 .

[338]  D. Goodwin.  The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies , 1992 .

[339]  D. Brassart.  Negation, concession and refutation in counter-argumentative composition by pupils from 8 to 12 years old and adults , 1992 .

[340]  Chapter 35. The Use of Argument by Preschool Children: the Emergent Production of Rules for Winning Arguments , 1992 .

[341]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem , 1992 .

[342]  Geert-Lueke Lueken.  Inkommensurabilität als Problem rationalen Argumentierens , 1992 .

[343]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Shifts and Fallacies* , 1992 .

[344]  Susan L. Kline,et al.  "The New Rhetoric"'s Argument Schemes: A Rhetorical View of Practical Reasoning. , 1992 .

[345]  Manfred Kienpointner.  Alltagslogik : Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern , 1992 .

[346]  William H. Brenner.  Logic and Philosophy , 1993 .

[347]  T. Farrell.  Norms of Rhetorical Culture , 1993 .

[348]  Being unreasonable: Perelman and the problem of fallacies , 1993 .

[349]  Stuart C. Brown,et al.  Defining the new rhetorics , 1993 .

[350]  Not by Skill Alone: The Centrality of Character to Critical Thinking , 1993 .

[351]  M. Kienpointner.  The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric , 1993 .

[352]  David Dunlap.  The conception of audience in Perelman and Isocrates: Locating the ideal in the real , 1993 .

[353]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  On the processing of arguments , 1993 .

[354]  G. Thomas Goodnight,et al.  Legitimation Inferences: An Additional Component for the Toulmin Model , 1993 .

[355]  Perelman's rhetorical foundation of philosophy , 1993 .

[356]  Eveline T. Feteris.  Rationality in legal discussions: A pragma-dialectical perspective , 1993 .

[357]  L. Wintgens.  Rhetoric, reasonableness and ethics: An essay on Perelman , 1993 .

[358]  E. Schiappa.  Arguing about definitions , 1993 .

[359]  B. Garssen.  Recognizing argumentation schemes , 1994 .

[360]  M. Agnes van Rees,et al.  Analysing and evaluating problem-solving discussions , 1995 .

[361]  P. Houtlosser,et al.  The speech act 'advancing a standpoint' , 1994 .

[362]  J. Herman,et al.  Begging the question. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[363]  Analysing and Evaluating Small-Group Decision-Making Discussions , 1994, Functional Communication Quality.

[364]  Writing argumentative texts: from analysis to presentation. , 1994 .

[365]  G. Kennedy.  A new history of classical rhetoric , 1994 .

[366]  K. de Glopper,et al.  Argumentation in written discourse: secondary school students' writing problems. , 1994 .

[367]  Mieczysław Maneli.  Perelman’s New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century , 1994 .

[368]  T. Wilkerson.  An Essay on Belief and Acceptance , 1994 .

[369]  Argument en tegenargument. Een inleiding in de analyse en beoordeling van betogende teksten , 1994 .

[370]  C. Ilie.  What else can I tell you?: A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive and argumentative acts , 1994 .

[371]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[372]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Reconstruction and application , 1995 .

[373]  Xizheng Shi.  Cultural attitudes in contexts of argumentation and explanation , 1995 .

[374]  A. F. Snoeck Henkemans.  'But' as an indicator of counter-arguments and concessions , 1995 .

[375]  A. F. Snoeck Henkemans.  'Anyway' and 'even' as indicators of argumentative structure , 1995 .

[376]  Nancy V. Wood.  Perspectives on Argument , 1995 .

[377]  J. Shand,et al.  The Place of Emotion in Argument , 1995 .

[378]  Perelman and the Fallacies , 1995 .

[379]  Argumentative discourse as a form of social interaction: implications for dialectical reconstruction , 1995 .

[380]  Henry Johnstone's Anagnorisis : Argumentum ad Hominem as tragic trope of truth , 1995 .

[381]  P. Dangerfield.  Logic , 1996, Aristotle and the Stoics.

[382]  Functions of repetition in informal discussions , 1996 .

[383]  R. Alfaro-LeFevre.  Critical thinking. , 1997, Nursing spectrum.

[384]  Argumentation on argumentation. , 1997 .

[385]  Jing Hao.  Figure , 1972, Analysing Scientific Discourse From a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective.