Capturing residents' values for urban green space: mapping, analysis and guidance for practice.

Planning for green space is guided by standards and guidelines but there is currently little understanding of the variety of values people assign to green spaces or their determinants. Land use planners need to know what values are associated with different landscape characteristics and how value elicitation techniques can inform decisions. We designed a Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) study and surveyed residents of four urbanising suburbs in the Lower Hunter region of NSW, Australia. Participants assigned dots on maps to indicate places they associated with a typology of values (specific attributes or functions considered important) and negative qualities related to green spaces. The marker points were digitised and aggregated according to discrete park polygons for statistical analysis. People assigned a variety of values to green spaces (such as aesthetic value or social interaction value), which were related to landscape characteristics. Some variables (e.g. distance to water) were statistically associated with multiple open space values. Distance from place of residence however did not strongly influence value assignment after landscape configuration was accounted for. Value compatibility analysis revealed that some values co-occurred in park polygons more than others (e.g. nature value and health/therapeutic value). Results highlight the potential for PPGIS techniques to inform green space planning through the spatial representation of complex human-nature relationships. However, a number of potential pitfalls and challenges should be addressed. These include the non-random spatial arrangement of landscape features that can skew interpretation of results and the need to communicate clearly about theory that explains observed patterns.

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[2]  B. Norton.  Environmental Values: A Place-Based Theory , 2022 .

[3]  Dave Kendal,et al.  Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land , 2013 .

[4]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[5]  T. Sievänen,et al.  Access to green areas and the frequency of visits : A case study in Helsinki , 2007 .

[6]  Max Nielsen-Pincus,et al.  An Evaluation of Internet Versus Paper‐based Methods for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) , 2012, Trans. GIS.

[7]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Biodiversity and the Feel-Good Factor: Understanding Associations between Self-Reported Human Well-Being and Species Richness , 2012 .

[8]  Giuseppe Carrus,et al.  The Ambivalence of Attitudes Toward Urban Green Areas: Between Proenvironmental Worldviews and Daily Residential Experience , 2011 .

[9]  D. Hober,et al.  Enteroviruses and type 1 diabetes: towards a better understanding of the relationship , 2010, Reviews in medical virology.

[10]  G. Fry,et al.  Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration , 2009 .

[11]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[12]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[13]  Greg Brown,et al.  Measuring Change in Place Values for Environmental and Natural Resource Planning Using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): Results and Challenges for Longitudinal Research , 2014 .

[14]  Dave Kendal,et al.  The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  T. Brown,et al.  The Concept of Value in Resource Allocation , 2016 .

[16]  Marketta Kyttä,et al.  Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality , 2013 .

[17]  Robert Fish,et al.  What are shared and social values of ecosystems , 2015 .

[18]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research , 2015 .

[19]  Greg Brown,et al.  Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits , 2014 .

[20]  D. Wurster,et al.  Does diversity matter? The experience of urban nature’s diversity: Case study and cultural concept , 2015 .

[21]  A. Church,et al.  Cultural ecosystem services in the UK: Lessons on designing indicators to inform management and policy , 2016 .

[22]  A. Zeileis,et al.  Regression Models for Count Data in R , 2008 .

[23]  Greg Brown.  Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research , 2012 .

[24]  Nick Wates.  The Community Planning Handbook : How People Can Shape Their Cities, Towns and Villages in Any Part of the World , 2014 .

[25]  Andy P. Jones,et al.  Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: Development of a theoretical framework , 2013 .

[26]  Marketta Kyttä,et al.  Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process , 2016 .

[27]  D. Horst,et al.  The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning , 2015 .

[28]  Greg Brown,et al.  Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study , 2002 .

[29]  E. Zube.  Perceived land use patterns and landscape values , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Greg Brown,et al.  Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgement for land use planning using public participation geographic information systems , 2015 .

[31]  What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks? , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  J. Schipperijn,et al.  Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas , 2007 .

[33]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Environmental Values: A Place-Based Approach , 1997 .

[34]  Gavin R McCormack,et al.  Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. , 2010, Health & place.

[35]  C. Ives,et al.  The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes , 2016 .

[36]  E. Wilson,et al.  The biophilia hypothesis , 1993 .

[37]  A. Purcell,et al.  Preference or preferences for landscape , 1994 .

[38]  R. Maheswaran,et al.  The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[39]  P. Gobster,et al.  Shades of Green: Measuring the Ecology of Urban Green Space in the Context of Human Health and Well-Being , 2010 .

[40]  P L Busby,et al.  Environmental psychology 1989-1994. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  C. V. D. Bosch,et al.  Methods for mapping recreational and social values in urban green spaces in the nordic countries and their comparative merits for urban planning , 2015 .

[42]  Gregory Brown,et al.  A Theory of Urban Park Geography , 2008 .

[43]  Defining and measuring the social-ecological quality of urban greenspace: a semi-systematic review , 2015, Urban Ecosystems.

[44]  Carys Swanwick,et al.  Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. , 2009 .

[45]  Shivanand Balram,et al.  Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements , 2005 .

[46]  Public perceptions of freshwater wetlands in Victoria, Australia , 2013 .

[47]  G. Fry,et al.  The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research , 2015 .

[49]  Neil Sipe,et al.  Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – A review of the literature and best practice , 2010 .

[50]  R. Burton Litton,et al.  Water and Landscape: An Aesthetic Overview of the Role of Water in the Landscape , 1974 .

[51]  U. Stigsdotter,et al.  Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces , 2013 .

[52]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[53]  Tseira Maruani,et al.  Open space planning models: A review of approaches and methods , 2007 .

[54]  L. Nahuelhual,et al.  Mapping social values of ecosystem services: What is behind the map? , 2016 .

[55]  Nigel Dunnett,et al.  Nature, Role and Value of Green Space in Towns and Cities: An Overview , 2003 .

[56]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes , 1985 .

[57]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[58]  H. Campbell.  Planning to Change the World , 2012 .

[59]  C. Raymond,et al.  Mapping community values for regional sustainability in the Lower Hunter Region , 2013 .

[60]  A. Chiesura.  The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. , 2004 .

[61]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Studying the preoccupations that prevent people from going into green space , 2013 .

[62]  A. Herzele,et al.  On the argumentative work of map-based visualisation , 2011 .