Language universals in human brains

Do speakers know universal restrictions on linguistic elements that are absent from their language? We report an experimental test of this question. Our case study concerns the universal restrictions on initial consonant sequences, onset clusters (e.g., bl in block). Across languages, certain onset clusters (e.g., lb) are dispreferred (e.g., systematically under-represented) relative to others (e.g., bl). We demonstrate such preferences among Korean speakers, whose language lacks initial C1C2 clusters altogether. Our demonstration exploits speakers' well known tendency to misperceive ill-formed clusters. We show that universally dispreferred onset clusters are more frequently misperceived than universally preferred ones, indicating that Korean speakers consider the former cluster-type more ill-formed. The misperception of universally ill-formed clusters is unlikely to be due to a simple auditory failure. Likewise, the aversion of universally dispreferred onsets by Korean speakers is not explained by English proficiency or by several phonetic and phonological properties of Korean. We conclude that language universals are neither relics of language change nor are they artifacts of generic limitations on auditory perception and motor control—they reflect universal linguistic knowledge, active in speakers' brains.

[1]  Joe Pater The harmonic mind : from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar , 2009 .

[2]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology , 2008 .

[3]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[4]  D. Steriade,et al.  What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  José Ignacio Hualde,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9 , 2007 .

[6]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Learning Phonology With Substantive Bias: An Experimental and Computational Study of Velar Palatalization , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[8]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[9]  Yoonjung Kang,et al.  Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean , 2003, Phonology.

[10]  Kyung ShimKang The status of onglides in korean : evidence from speech errors , 2003 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[14]  M. Pitt,et al.  Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A Prince,et al.  Optimality: From Neural Networks to Universal Grammar , 1997, Science.

[16]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints , 1997 .

[17]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[18]  Young-Key Kim-Renaud Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics , 1995 .

[19]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[20]  Daniel Finer,et al.  Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax , 1991 .

[21]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[22]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and representations , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[25]  T. Bever,et al.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals in Children and Adolescents. , 1975 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Language and Mind , 1973 .