A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations

Widespread adoption of quantitative pharmacokinetic modeling methods in conjunction with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has led to increased recognition of the importance of obtaining accurate patient-specific arterial input function (AIF) measurements. Ideally, DCE-MRI studies use an AIF directly measured in an artery local to the tissue of interest, along with measured tissue concentration curves, to quantitatively determine pharmacokinetic parameters. However, the numerous technical and practical difficulties associated with AIF measurement have made the use of population-averaged AIF data a popular, if sub-optimal, alternative to AIF measurement. In this work, we present and characterize a new algorithm for determining the AIF solely from the measured tissue concentration curves. This Monte Carlo blind estimation (MCBE) algorithm estimates the AIF from the subsets of D concentration-time curves drawn from a larger pool of M candidate curves via nonlinear optimization, doing so for multiple (Q) subsets and statistically averaging these repeated estimates. The MCBE algorithm can be viewed as a generalization of previously published methods that employ clustering of concentration-time curves and only estimate the AIF once. Extensive computer simulations were performed over physiologically and experimentally realistic ranges of imaging and tissue parameters, and the impact of choosing different values of D and Q was investigated. We found the algorithm to be robust, computationally efficient and capable of accurately estimating the AIF even for relatively high noise levels, long sampling intervals and low diversity of tissue curves. With the incorporation of bootstrapping initialization, we further demonstrated the ability to blindly estimate AIFs that deviate substantially in shape from the population-averaged initial guess. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for K(trans), k(ep), v(p) and v(e) all showed relative biases and uncertainties of less than 10% for measurements having a temporal sampling rate of 4 s and a concentration measurement noise level of sigma = 0.04 mM. A companion paper discusses the application of the MCBE algorithm to DCE-MRI data acquired in eight patients with malignant brain tumors.

[1]  Wan-Chi Siu,et al.  A technique for extracting physiological parameters and the required input function simultaneously from PET image measurements: theory and simulation study , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[2]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Analysis of partial volume effects on arterial input functions using gradient echo: A simulation study , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Partial volume effects on arterial input functions: Shape and amplitude distortions and their correction , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced–MRI analysis , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a pharmacodynamic measure of response after acute dosing of AG-013736, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: II. Experimental Validation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[10]  Paolo Vicini,et al.  Kinetic Modeling of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: An Automated Technique for Assessing Inflammation in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Wrist , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  D. Pennell,et al.  Optimization of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Edward V R Dibella,et al.  Model‐based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)‐MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Ying Lu,et al.  AG-013736, a novel inhibitor of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases, inhibits breast cancer growth and decreases vascular permeability as detected by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  M. Viergever,et al.  Correcting partial volume artifacts of the arterial input function in quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Robert C Brasch,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate marker of tumor response to anti‐angiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  G. Parker,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  Daniel C. Lee,et al.  Quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[18]  R. Moots,et al.  Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI of the hand and wrist in rheumatoid arthritis and the response to anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α therapy , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  B K Rutt,et al.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  D. Buckley,et al.  Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  N. Hylton Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  E. DiBella,et al.  Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  D. Gadian,et al.  Bolus delay and dispersion in perfusion MRI: Implications for tissue predictor models in stroke , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood–brain‐barrier leakage with DCE‐MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng,et al.  Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Yeng Chai Soh,et al.  A physiologic model of capillary-tissue exchange for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumor microcirculation , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Renate Grüner,et al.  Magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging with voxel‐specific arterial input functions , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Xin Li,et al.  A unified magnetic resonance imaging pharmacokinetic theory: Intravascular and extracellular contrast reagents , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Tal Laor,et al.  Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis based on pharmacokinetic modeling. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[33]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI studies: Fundamental concepts and simulations , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE‐MRI data , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  M. Jerosch-Herold,et al.  Stress Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart , 2008, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[36]  Edward V. R. Di Bella,et al.  Estimation of kinetic parameters without input functions: analysis of three methods for multichannel blind identification , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[38]  D. Riabkov,et al.  Blind identification of the kinetic parameters in three-compartment models , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  M. Viergever,et al.  Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng,et al.  T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1‐weighted DCE‐MRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  G. Gullberg,et al.  Blind estimation of compartmental model parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  B. Dardzinski,et al.  Quantifying dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  Edward V R DiBella,et al.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  Joanne Markham,et al.  Precision, signal‐to‐noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  Alan Jackson,et al.  Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[47]  H. Amthauer,et al.  Brain tumor perfusion: comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2, and T2* contrast, pulsed arterial spin labeling, and H2(15)O positron emission tomography. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[48]  T S Koh,et al.  The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of physiological parameters and the input function - in vivo PET data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[50]  D. Parker,et al.  Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  T W Redpath,et al.  The effects of renal variation upon measurements of perfusion and leakage volume in breast tumours. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[52]  A R Padhani,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in oncology with an emphasis on quantification, validation and human studies. , 2001, Clinical radiology.