Safety and immunogenicity of the protein-based PHH-1V compared to BNT162b2 as a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine in adults vaccinated against COVID-19: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase IIb trial

Background: A SARS-CoV-2 protein-based heterodimer vaccine, PHH-1V, has been shown to be safe and well-tolerated in healthy young adults in a first-in-human, Phase I/IIa study dose-escalation trial. Here, we report the interim results of the Phase IIb HH-2, where the immunogenicity and safety of a heterologous booster with PHH-1V is assessed versus a homologous booster with BNT162b2 at 14 and 98 days after vaccine administration. Methods: The HH-2 study is an ongoing multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority Phase IIb trial, where participants 18 years or older who had received two doses of BNT162b2 were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a booster dose of vaccine either heterologous (PHH-1V group) or homologous (BNT162b2 group) in 10 centres in Spain. Eligible subjects were allocated to treatment stratified by age group (18-64 versus [≥]65 years) with approximately 10% of the sample enrolled in the older age group. The endpoints were humoral immunogenicity measured by changes in levels of neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain and different variants of SARS-CoV-2 after the PHH-1V or the BNT162b2 boost, the T-cell responses towards the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein peptides and the safety and tolerability of PHH-1V as a boost. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05142553. Findings: From 15 November 2021, 782 adults were randomly assigned to PHH-1V (n=522) or BNT162b2 (n=260) boost vaccine groups. The geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of neutralizing antibodies on days 14 and 98, shown as BNT162b2 active control versus PHH-1V, was, respectively, 1.68 (p<0.0001) and 0.87 (p=0.43) for the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain; 0.61 (p<0.0001) and 0.57 (p=0.0064) for the beta variant; 1.01 (p=0.89) and 0.52 (p=0.0003) for the delta variant; and 0.59 (p=<0.0001) and 0.56 (p=0.0026) for the omicron variant. Additionally, PHH-1V as a booster dose induced a significant increase of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells expressing IFN-{gamma} on day 14. There were 458 participants who experienced at least one adverse event (89.3%) in the PHH-1V and 238 (94.4%) in the BNT162b2 group. The most frequent adverse events were injection site pain (79.7% and 89.3%), fatigue (27.5% and 42.1%) and headache (31.2 and 40.1%) for the PHH-1V and the BNT162b2 groups, respectively. A total of 52 COVID-19 cases occurred from day 14 post-vaccination (10.14%) for the PHH-1V group and 30 (11.90%) for the BNT162b2 group (p=0.45), and none of the subjects developed severe COVID-19. Interpretation: Our interim results from the Phase IIb HH-2 trial show that PHH-1V as a heterologous booster vaccine, when compared to BNT162b2, elicits a strong and sustained neutralizing antibody response against Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, and a superior one concerning the previous circulating beta and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as the currently circulating omicron. Moreover, the PHH-1V boost also induces a strong and balanced T-cell response. Concerning the safety profile, subjects in the PHH-1V group report significantly fewer adverse events than those in the BNT162b2 group, most of mild intensity, and both vaccine groups present comparable COVID-19 breakthrough cases, none of them severe. Funding: HIPRA SCIENTIFIC, S.L.U.

[1]  Xing Wu,et al.  Considerations for the Feasibility of Neutralizing Antibodies as a Surrogate Endpoint for COVID-19 Vaccines , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[2]  N. Hulo,et al.  Infectious viral load in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals infected with ancestral, Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2 , 2022, Nature Medicine.

[3]  A. Almeman,et al.  Management of COVID-19 vaccines cold chain logistics: a scoping review , 2022, Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice.

[4]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Structural basis for SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant recognition of ACE2 receptor and broadly neutralizing antibodies , 2022, Nature Communications.

[5]  M. Koopmans,et al.  Divergent SARS CoV-2 Omicron-reactive T- and B cell responses in COVID-19 vaccine recipients , 2022, Science Immunology.

[6]  L. Poon,et al.  Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.1 following homologous and heterologous CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination , 2022, Nature Medicine.

[7]  V. Libri,et al.  Immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of heterologous COVID-19 primary vaccination incorporating mRNA, viral-vector, and protein-adjuvant vaccines in the UK (Com-COV2): a single-blind, randomised, phase 2, non-inferiority trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[8]  Rui Wang,et al.  Omicron (B.1.1.529): Infectivity, vaccine breakthrough, and antibody resistance , 2021, ArXiv.

[9]  E. Dolgin How protein-based COVID vaccines could change the pandemic , 2021, Nature.

[10]  D. Vaughn,et al.  Scientific rationale for developing potent RBD-based vaccines targeting COVID-19 , 2021, npj Vaccines.

[11]  K. Stiasny,et al.  Distinguishing features of current COVID-19 vaccines: knowns and unknowns of antigen presentation and modes of action , 2021, NPJ vaccines.

[12]  A. Folgori,et al.  Strong immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost immunizations with the experimental vaccine GRAd-COV2 and BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-nCOV19 , 2021, npj Vaccines.

[13]  M. V. Van Kerkhove,et al.  Increased transmissibility and global spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern as at June 2021 , 2021, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[14]  M. Davenport,et al.  Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[15]  D. Altmann,et al.  Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of reactogenicity, immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, npj Vaccines.

[16]  Hannah Ritchie,et al.  A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[17]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Blockade of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated cell–cell fusion using COVID-19 convalescent plasma , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[18]  L. Du,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: a key target for eliciting persistent neutralizing antibodies , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[19]  Esteban Ortiz Prado,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccines strategies: a comprehensive review of phase 3 candidates , 2021, NPJ vaccines.

[20]  R. Paredes,et al.  Stable neutralizing antibody levels 6 months after mild and severe COVID-19 episodes , 2021, Med.

[21]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. , 2020, Lancet.

[22]  M. Landini,et al.  Body Localization of ACE-2: On the Trail of the Keyhole of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[23]  Y. Hu,et al.  Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial , 2020, The Lancet.

[24]  Barney S. Graham,et al.  Rapid COVID-19 vaccine development , 2020, Science.