On the Representation of Heterogeneity in Land-Surface–Atmosphere Coupling

A realistic representation of processes that are not resolved by the model grid is one of the key challenges in Earth-system modelling. In particular, the non-linear nature of processes involved makes a representation of the link between the atmosphere and the land surface difficult. This is especially so when the land surface is horizontally strongly heterogeneous. In the majority of present day Earth system models two strategies are pursued to couple the land surface and the atmosphere. In the first approach, surface heterogeneity is not explicitly accounted for, instead effective parameters are used to represent the entirety of the land surface in a model’s grid box (parameter-aggregation). In the second approach, subgrid-scale variability at the surface is explicitly represented, but it is assumed that the blending height is located below the lowest atmospheric model level (simple flux-aggregation). Thus, in both approaches the state of the atmosphere is treated as being horizontally homogeneous within a given grid box. Based upon the blending height concept, an approach is proposed that allows for a land-surface–atmosphere coupling in which horizontal heterogeneity is considered not only at the surface, but also within the lowest layers of the atmosphere (the VERTEX scheme). Below the blending height, the scheme refines the turbulent mixing process with respect to atmospheric subgrid fractions, which correspond to different surface features. These subgrid fractions are not treated independently of each other, since an explicit horizontal component is integrated into the turbulent mixing process. The scheme was implemented into the JSBACH model, the land component of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology’s Earth-system model, when coupled to the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM. The single-column version of the Earth system model is used in two example cases in order to demonstrate how the effects of surface heterogeneity are transferred into the atmosphere, influencing local stability and the turbulent mixing process. Furthermore, a simple flux-aggregation scheme was implemented into the JSBACH model. By comparing single-column simulations utilizing the VERTEX scheme and the simple flux-aggregation scheme, it can be shown that the horizontal disaggregation of the turbulent mixing process has a substantial impact on the simulated mean state of a grid box. Here, the differences between simulations with the two schemes may, in certain cases, be even larger than the differences between simulations with the simple flux-aggregation scheme and simulations in which surface heterogeneity is not explicitly accounted for (i.e., a parameter-aggregation scheme).

[1]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Biosphere-atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model , 1986 .

[2]  M. Claussen,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate , 1996 .

[3]  T. Hiyama,et al.  Aircraft Observations of the Development of Thermal Internal Boundary Layers and Scaling of the Convective Boundary Layer Over Non-Homogeneous Land Surfaces , 2004 .

[4]  R. Banta,et al.  Mixing‐height differences between land use types: Dependence on wind speed , 2003 .

[5]  A. Arola Parameterization of Turbulent and Mesoscale Fluxes for Heterogeneous Surfaces , 1999 .

[6]  E. Roeckner,et al.  Sensitivity of a general circulation model to parameterizations of cloud–turbulence interactions in the atmospheric boundary layer , 1995 .

[7]  R. Pielke,et al.  The Impact of Crop Areas in Northeast Colorado on Midsummer Mesoscale Thermal Circulations , 1989 .

[8]  Cathy Hohenegger,et al.  The Influence of Land Surface Heterogeneities on Cloud Size Development , 2014 .

[9]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  A global data set of land-surface parameters , 1994 .

[10]  Pavel Kabat,et al.  The scaling characteristics of soil parameters: From plot scale heterogeneity to subgrid parameterization , 1997 .

[11]  L. Mahrt Surface Heterogeneity and Vertical Structure of the Boundary Layer , 2000, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[12]  P. Sellers Modeling and observing land-surface-atmosphere interactions on large scales , 1991 .

[13]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation , 2008 .

[14]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Drying front in a sloping aquifer: Nonlinear effects , 2004 .

[15]  R. Banta,et al.  Urban-rural contrasts in mixing height and cloudiness over Nashville in 1999: URBAN-RURAL MIXING HEIGHT AND CLOUDINESS , 2003 .

[16]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology , 1989 .

[17]  P. J. Mason,et al.  The formation of areally‐averaged roughness lengths , 1988 .

[18]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An Approach for the Representation of Surface Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models. Part II: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments , 1997 .

[19]  J. Finnigan,et al.  Scale issues in boundary-layer meteorology: Surface energy balances in heterogeneous terrain , 1995 .

[20]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  Strength of forest-albedo feedback in mid-Holocene climate simulations , 2011 .

[21]  Jan Polcher,et al.  A Proposed Structure for Coupling Tiled Surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[22]  Robert E. Dickinson,et al.  Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: Explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere‐atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) , 1994 .

[23]  M. Lehning,et al.  Relative importance of advective heat transport and boundary layer decoupling in the melt dynamics of a patchy snow cover , 2013 .

[24]  S. Derbyshire Boundary-Layer Decoupling over Cold Surfaces as a Physical Boundary-Instability , 1999 .

[25]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[26]  A. Molod,et al.  A global assessment of the mosaic approach to modeling land surface heterogeneity , 2002 .

[27]  A. Blackadar The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere , 1962 .

[28]  Martin Claussen,et al.  Flux aggregation at large scales: on the limits of validity of the concept of blending height , 1995 .

[29]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  A comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representations , 1992 .

[30]  Roni Avissar,et al.  Representation of heterogeneity effects in Earth system modeling: Experience from land surface modeling , 1997 .

[31]  Charles Meneveau,et al.  Large‐eddy simulation of neutral atmospheric boundary layer flow over heterogeneous surfaces: Blending height and effective surface roughness , 2004 .

[32]  Beniamino Gioli,et al.  Bridging the gap between atmospheric concentrations and local ecosystem measurements , 2009 .

[33]  Martin Claussen,et al.  Estimation of areally-averaged surface fluxes , 1991 .

[34]  B. Stevens,et al.  Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 , 2013 .

[35]  J. Wieringa,et al.  An objective exposure correction method for average wind speeds measured at a sheltered location , 1976 .

[36]  Chin-Hoh Moeng,et al.  The Influence of Idealized Heterogeneity on Wet and Dry Planetary Boundary Layers Coupled to the Land Surface. , 2005 .

[37]  R. Benoit,et al.  A Finite-Element Model of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Suitable for Use with Numerical Weather Prediction Models , 1982 .

[38]  Clemens Simmer,et al.  Improved Representation of Land-surface Heterogeneity in a Non-hydrostatic Numerical Weather Prediction Model , 2006 .

[39]  Roni Avissar,et al.  Conceptual aspects of a statistical‐dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid‐scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models , 1992 .

[40]  M. Menenti,et al.  Analysis of the land surface heterogeneity and its impact on atmospheric variables and the aerodynamic and thermodynamic roughness lengths , 2008 .

[41]  S. R. Shewchuk,et al.  Modeling the impact of averaging on aggregation of surface fluxes over BOREAS , 1997 .

[42]  Andrea Molod,et al.  A New Look at Modeling Surface Heterogeneity: Extending Its Influence in the Vertical , 2003 .

[43]  Y. Xue,et al.  Land Surface Energy and Moisture Fluxes: Comparing Three Models , 1998 .

[44]  Günther Heinemann,et al.  Comparison of methods for area‐averaging surface energy fluxes over heterogeneous land surfaces using high‐resolution non‐hydrostatic simulations , 2005 .

[45]  T. Phillips,et al.  A proposal for a general interface between land surface schemes and general circulation models , 1998 .

[46]  S. Roy,et al.  A preferred scale for landscape forced mesoscale circulations , 2003 .

[47]  B. Hurk,et al.  Impact of Some Simplifying Assumptions in the New ECMWF Surface Scheme , 1996 .

[48]  J. Crank Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems 2nd edn , 1968 .

[49]  G. Mellor,et al.  Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems , 1982 .

[50]  M. Lehning,et al.  Atmospheric Flow Development and Associated Changes in Turbulent Sensible Heat Flux over a Patchy Mountain Snow Cover , 2015 .

[51]  Roni Avissar,et al.  Using Similarity Theory to Parameterize Mesoscale Heat Fluxes Generated by Subgrid-Scale Landscape Discontinuities in GCMs , 1995 .

[52]  Nigel Wood,et al.  The influence of static stability on the effective roughness lengths for momentum and heat transfer , 1991 .

[53]  J. Polcher,et al.  On the Land Surface–Atmosphere Coupling and Its Impact in a Single-Column Atmospheric Model , 2001 .

[54]  Roni Avissar,et al.  An Evaluation of the Scale at which Ground-Surface Heat Flux Patchiness Affects the Convective Boundary Layer Using Large-Eddy Simulations , 1998 .

[55]  Jan Polcher,et al.  COMPARING THREE LAND SURFACE SCHEMES USED IN GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS , 1996 .

[56]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[57]  Richard Essery,et al.  Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme , 2003 .

[58]  R. Feddes,et al.  Large-scale field experiments to improve land surface parameterisations. , 1998 .

[59]  J. Louis A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere , 1979 .

[60]  David Rind,et al.  The Importance of Mesoscale Circulations Generated by Subgrid-Scale Landscape Heterogeneities in General Circulation Models , 1995 .

[61]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An Approach for the Representation of Surface Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models. Part I: Theoretical Framework , 1997 .

[62]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Global biogeophysical interactions between forest and climate , 2009 .

[63]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century? , 2007 .

[64]  Nathaniel A. Brunsell,et al.  Surface heterogeneity impacts on boundary layer dynamics via energy balance partitioning , 2010 .