Set-Based Approach to Design under Uncertainty and Applications to Shaping a Hydrofoil

Abstract : The paper presents a framework for set-based design under uncertainty and demonstrates its viability through a shape design case of an efficient super-cavitating hydrofoil for ultra-high speed maritime vehicles. Redirecting the effort away from optimal designs to those that safely meet relevant requirements as quantified precisely by super quantile measures of risk (s-risk), the paper addresses situations faced in practice where elimination of poor designs is more important than identifying a best one. The complexity of the design case, involving multiphysics and several design constraints, necessitates the use of surrogate models, which are built using high- and low-fidelity simulations and are here tuned for the first time to reflect s-risk. Accounting for both parameter uncertainty as well as errors in surrogate models, we obtain robust designs that satisfy requirements under a variety of manufacturing and operating conditions.

[1]  Xiangyun Qing,et al.  A Mixed Interval Arithmetic/Affine Arithmetic Approach for Robust Design Optimization With Interval Uncertainty , 2016 .

[2]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Risk Tuning With Generalized Linear Regression , 2007, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Development of Reliability-Based Damage-Tolerant Optimal Design of Ship Structures , 2015 .

[4]  M. Tulin,et al.  Linearized Theory for Flows about Lifting Foils at Zero Cavitation Number , 2010 .

[5]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  Fusion of hard and soft information in nonparametric density estimation , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions , 2001 .

[7]  S. Brizzolara A New Family of Dual-Mode Super-Cavitating Hydrofoils , 2015 .

[8]  Luca Bonfiglio,et al.  A Multiphase RANSE-based Computational Tool for the Analysis of Super-Cavitating Hydrofoils , 2016 .

[9]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Giuliano Vernengo,et al.  Physics-Based Design by Optimization of Unconventional Supercavitating Hydrofoils , 2016 .

[11]  D. R. Stinebring,et al.  A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction , 2000 .

[12]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Steel Box Structures. II: Ship Structure Applications , 2015 .

[13]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[14]  Luca Bonfiglio,et al.  Comparative CFD Investigation on the Performance of a New Family of Super-Cavitating Hydrofoils , 2015 .

[15]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  Engineering Decisions under Risk Averseness , 2015 .

[16]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Optimal design with probabilistic objective and constraints , 2006 .

[17]  Yu Liu,et al.  Reliability-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Using Subset Simulation Analysis and Its Application in the Hydraulic Transmission Mechanism Design , 2014 .

[18]  Subhrajit Dutta,et al.  Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Frame-Supported Tensile Membrane Structures , 2017 .

[19]  David J. Singer,et al.  What Is Set-Based Design? , 2009 .

[20]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[21]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Special Issue: Design Under Uncertainty , 2012 .

[22]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  On buffered failure probability in design and optimization of structures , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Steel Box Structures. I: Theory , 2015 .

[24]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[26]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  Measures of Residual Risk with Connections to Regression, Risk Tracking, Surrogate Models, and Ambiguity , 2015, SIAM J. Optim..