A comparison of ultrasonic wavefront distortion and compensation in one-dimensional and two-dimensional apertures

A comparison of wavefront distortion and compensation in one-dimensional and two-dimensional apertures is made using two-dimensional transmission measurements through 14 different specimens of human abdominal wall. The measurements were employed to emulate data in one dimension by summing waveforms in the elevation direction after a geometric correction was performed using a fourth-order polynomial fit to the surface of arrival time. Distortion calculation and time-shift compensation were performed independently on waveforms in the one-dimensional and two-dimensional apertures and the waveforms were focussed using a Fourier transform method to obtain the point-spread function in the central elevation plane. The results show that distortion is smoothed increasingly by one-dimensional apertures as the elevation dimension grows and that the smoothing is substantial for elevations similar to those employed in present clinical imagers. The results also show that one-dimensional compensation becomes less effective than two-dimensional compensation as the size of the elevation increases but that one-dimensional compensation performs almost as well as two-dimensional compensation in apertures with elevations like those in current imaging systems.<<ETX>>

[1]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurements of ultrasonic pulse arrival time and energy level variations produced by propagation through abdominal wall. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurements of ultrasonic pulse arrival time differences produced by abdominal wall specimens. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R C Waag,et al.  Correction of ultrasonic wavefront distortion using backpropagation and a reference waveform method for time-shift compensation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D C Sullivan,et al.  Two dimensional ultrasonic beam distortion in the breast: in vivo measurements and effects. , 1992, Ultrasonic imaging.

[5]  K. Takamizawa,et al.  An investigation of wavefront distortion correction: correction using averaged phase information and the effect of correction in one and two dimensions (medical US imaging) , 1991, IEEE 1991 Ultrasonics Symposium,.

[6]  B.D. Steinberg,et al.  Wavefront amplitude distortion and image sidelobe levels. II. In vivo experiments , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Q Zhu,et al.  Wavefront amplitude distribution in the female breast. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G. Trahey,et al.  In Vivo Measurements of Ultrasonic Beam Distortion in the Breast , 1991 .

[9]  R C Waag,et al.  Time-shift compensation of ultrasonic pulse focus degradation using least-mean-square error estimates of arrival time. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.