Multi-scale roughness measurement of cementitious materials using different optical profilers and window resizing analysis

In the development of new eco-cements for ecologically friendly construction, the porosity, surface structure and chemical nature of the material can influence the bioreceptivity of the surface and the aptitude or not of environmental micro-organisms to form biofilms. Such films are the source of biocontamination that can lead to a degradation in the structural properties over time. Accurate measurement of surface roughness and topography are important to help in the understanding of this interaction. Optical profilers are well adapted to the quantifying of large surface roughness typical of cementitious materials, being more rapid and better able to cope with high roughness compared with stylus and near field probe techniques. But any given surface profiler typically has specific range limits in terms of axial and lateral resolution and field of view, resulting in different roughness values according to the type of optical profiler used. In the present work, unpolished and polished cement paste samples have been measured with two different systems, one using interference microscopy and the other, chromatic confocal sensing. Comparison of the results from both techniques using the method of window re-sizing, more commonly used in tribology, has been used for calculating the average roughness parameters at different scales. The initial results obtained show a successful overlap of the results for the unpolished samples and a slight separation for the polished samples. The validation of the measurements is demonstrated together with a revealing of differences in the measurements on different types of surfaces due to variations in instrument performance.

[1]  Bruno Serio,et al.  Challenges in the areal measurement of surface roughness and shape at the micro and nanoscale , 2014 .

[2]  Bruno Serio,et al.  Comparison of areal measurements of the same zone of etched Si and hydroxyapatite layers on etched Si using different profiling techniques , 2014, Photonics Europe.

[3]  G. Kino,et al.  Confocal Scanning Optical Microscopy and Related Imaging Systems , 1996 .

[4]  Eduardo Júlio,et al.  A state-of-the-art review on roughness quantification methods for concrete surfaces , 2013 .

[5]  William Jason Weiss,et al.  Atomic force and lateral force microscopy (AFM and LFM) examinations of cement and cement hydration products , 2013 .

[6]  Vagelis G. Papadakis,et al.  An AFM-SEM investigation of the effect of silica fume and fly ash on cement paste microstructure , 1999 .

[7]  Jian Lin,et al.  Fluctuations of the dynamic fracture energy values related to the amount of created fracture surface , 2014 .

[8]  D. Montaner,et al.  Characterization of inhomogeneous colloidal layers using adapted coherence probe microscopy , 2010 .

[9]  F Salzenstein,et al.  Local frequency and envelope estimation by Teager-Kaiser energy operators in white-light scanning interferometry. , 2014, Optics express.

[10]  Gilles Escadeillas,et al.  A new test method to assess the bacterial deterioration of cementitious materials , 2011 .

[11]  Huan He,et al.  Cement paste surface roughness analysis using coherence scanning interferometry and confocal microscopy , 2015 .

[12]  Bruno Serio,et al.  Implementation of a fringe visibility based algorithm in coherence scanning interferometry for surface roughness measurement , 2013, Optical Metrology.

[13]  Julia Lobera,et al.  Measurement of Steep Surfaces Using White Light Interferometry , 2010 .