Three-dimensional lithospheric modelling at NORSAR: linearity of the method and amplitude variations from the anomalies

Summary. A modification of the Aid et al. technique for three-dimensional lithospheric modelling is used to find smoothly varying models for the P-wave velocity structure beneath NORSAR. The method includes ray tracing and calculation of geometrical spreading in the anomalies. The results of linear inversion of the travel-time data compare well with those of previous investigators. The assumption of linearity, which removes the need to ray trace through the anomalies, is tested with iterative solutions for both synthetic and real data. A model with an rms velocity perturbation of 3 per cent, extending to 120 km depth, is found to be reasonably linear. In fact the procedure leads to two models which satisfy the same amount of the real data but which differ by far more than the standard errors. However, these differences are not significant once the imperfect resolution is accounted for by using the total estimation error of the stochastic inverse. The depth of major anomalies appears to be greater than the array diameter and is therefore not well constrained. Comparing the geometrical spreading produced by these models with the amplitude variations observed at the array indicates that structure deeper than 120 km but shallower than 200 km makes an important contribution to the observations. None of the models used can produce variations as large as those in the amplitude data. For deep, essentially two-dimensional, anomalies the fit to these data is much better for sources to the NE of the array than for sources in other quadrants.

[1]  Joel Franklin,et al.  Well-posed stochastic extensions of ill-posed linear problems☆ , 1970 .

[2]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Amplitude Pattern Effects on NORSAR P-wave Detectability , 1974 .

[3]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Determination of the three‐dimensional seismic structure of the lithosphere , 1977 .

[4]  David Gubbins,et al.  Three-dimensional seismic ray tracing , 1977 .

[5]  J. Capon,et al.  A random medium analysis of crust and upper mantle structure under Norsar , 1974 .

[6]  John A. Hudson,et al.  The use of the Born approximation in seismic scattering problems , 1981 .

[7]  Donald W. Marquaridt Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation , 1970 .

[8]  John A. Hudson,et al.  The Excitation and Propagation of Elastic Waves , 1980 .

[9]  Kathy Whaler,et al.  Spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field: an example of a linear inverse problem , 1981 .

[10]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[11]  R. Wiggins,et al.  The general linear inverse problem - Implication of surface waves and free oscillations for earth structure. , 1972 .

[12]  Upper mantle heterogeneities beneath Central Europe , 1981 .

[13]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Joint interpretation of P‐wave time and amplitude anomalies in terms of lithospheric heterogeneities , 1978 .

[14]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Errors in time delay measurements , 1971 .

[15]  Beverley J. Moore Seismic ray theory for lithospheric structures with slight lateral variations , 1980 .

[16]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Resolution Analysis for Discrete Systems , 1978 .

[17]  D. Jackson The use of a priori data to resolve non‐uniqueness in linear inversion , 1979 .

[18]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[19]  K. Berteussen,et al.  Moho depth determinations based on spectral-ratio analysis of NORSAR long-period P waves , 1977 .

[20]  A. Christoffersson,et al.  On three‐dimensional inversion of P wave time residuals: Option for geological modeling , 1979 .

[21]  R. Fisher Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1971 .