Agora2.0: enhancing civic participation through a public display

Providing a common place for the civil society to gather and discuss topics of mutual interest is a growing challenge for social and collaborative computing. Web-based tools for civic engagement, while promising, are still disconnected from meaningful physical locations where citizens usually meet and might limit the involvement of a considerable portion of the citizen population. We propose a system, Agora2.0, designed to recover the useful function that public places have had in the past in promoting and regulating citizens' participation in public decisions. Agora2.0 is inspired by the old concept of the Greek agora, or public square. It is composed of an onsite interactive public display and an online site. We present the project, the analysis of the requirements, the system prototype, and its evaluation during deployments in a university and in a public relations office of a European city.

[1]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young , 2012, Pervasive.

[2]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later , 2012, Computer.

[3]  Anne-Marie Oostveen,et al.  Internet Voting Technologies and Civic Participation: The Users’ Perspective , 2004 .

[4]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices , 2012, CHI.

[5]  Florian Alt,et al.  The interacting places framework: conceptualizing public display applications that promote community interaction and place awareness , 2012, PerDis '12.

[6]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Display Blindness: The Effect of Expectations on Attention towards Digital Signage , 2009, Pervasive.

[7]  Nigel Davies,et al.  Real world responses to interactive gesture based public displays , 2011, MUM.

[8]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Wiki surveys : Open and quantifiable social data collection ∗ , 2012 .

[9]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? , 2008, Pervasive.

[10]  Jennifer Oser,et al.  Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification , 2013 .

[11]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Territoriality and behaviour on and around large vertical publicly-shared displays , 2012, DIS '12.

[12]  Matt Leighninger,et al.  Citizenship and governance in a wild, wired world: How should citizens and public managers use online tools to improve democracy? , 2011 .

[13]  Joseph F. McCarthy.  Promoting a Sense of Community with Ubiquitous Peripheral Displays , 2003 .

[14]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Designing Shared Public Display Networks - Implications from Today's Paper-Based Notice Areas , 2011, Pervasive.

[15]  Anthony Tang,et al.  Designing for bystanders: reflections on building a public digital forum , 2008, CHI.

[16]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Blending digital and physical spaces for ubiquitous community participation , 2004, CACM.

[17]  Shawn A. Ross,et al.  Survey Methodology , 2005, The SAGE Encyclopedia of the Sociology of Religion.

[18]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Digifieds: insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild , 2011, MUM.

[19]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city , 2012, CSCW.

[20]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects? , 2012, New Media Soc..

[21]  Shelly Farnham,et al.  Supporting community in third places with situated social software , 2009, C&T.

[22]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Supporting Community Awareness with Interactive Displays , 2012, Computer.

[23]  Uwe Hansmann,et al.  Pervasive Computing , 2003 .