Local fitness landscape of the green fluorescent protein

Fitness landscapes depict how genotypes manifest at the phenotypic level and form the basis of our understanding of many areas of biology, yet their properties remain elusive. Previous studies have analysed specific genes, often using their function as a proxy for fitness, experimentally assessing the effect on function of single mutations and their combinations in a specific sequence or in different sequences. However, systematic high-throughput studies of the local fitness landscape of an entire protein have not yet been reported. Here we visualize an extensive region of the local fitness landscape of the green fluorescent protein from Aequorea victoria (avGFP) by measuring the native function (fluorescence) of tens of thousands of derivative genotypes of avGFP. We show that the fitness landscape of avGFP is narrow, with 3/4 of the derivatives with a single mutation showing reduced fluorescence and half of the derivatives with four mutations being completely non-fluorescent. The narrowness is enhanced by epistasis, which was detected in up to 30% of genotypes with multiple mutations and mostly occurred through the cumulative effect of slightly deleterious mutations causing a threshold-like decrease in protein stability and a concomitant loss of fluorescence. A model of orthologous sequence divergence spanning hundreds of millions of years predicted the extent of epistasis in our data, indicating congruence between the fitness landscape properties at the local and global scales. The characterization of the local fitness landscape of avGFP has important implications for several fields including molecular evolution, population genetics and protein design.

[1]  M. DePristo,et al.  Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  T. Mackay Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene–gene interactions , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  Nicholas C. Wu,et al.  A Comprehensive Biophysical Description of Pairwise Epistasis throughout an Entire Protein Domain , 2014, Current Biology.

[4]  Wen-Hsiung Li Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codons , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[5]  J. Krug,et al.  Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  J. Crow,et al.  Efficiency of truncation selection. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D. Weinreich,et al.  Quantitative Description of a Protein Fitness Landscape Based on Molecular Features. , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[8]  M. Parera,et al.  Strong epistatic interactions within a single protein. , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  Fyodor A. Kondrashov,et al.  Sequence space and the ongoing expansion of the protein universe , 2010, Nature.

[10]  J. Poulain,et al.  Capturing the mutational landscape of the beta-lactamase TEM-1 , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Dan-Eric Nilsson,et al.  The spectral sensitivity of the lens eyes of a box jellyfish, Tripedalia cystophora (Conant) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  T. Ohta Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution , 1973, Nature.

[13]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  P. Keightley,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Infer the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations , 2013, Genetics.

[15]  H. Akashi,et al.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. , 1995, Genetics.

[16]  Robert B. Heckendorn,et al.  Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis? , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[17]  Claudia Bank,et al.  A systematic survey of an intragenic epistatic landscape , 2014, bioRxiv.

[18]  A. Dean,et al.  Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  D. Baker,et al.  High Resolution Mapping of Protein Sequence–Function Relationships , 2010, Nature Methods.

[20]  Ágnes Tóth-Petróczy,et al.  Systematic Mapping of Protein Mutational Space by Prolonged Drift Reveals the Deleterious Effects of Seemingly Neutral Mutations , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  S. Sunyaev,et al.  Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities in protein evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Crow,et al.  Effect of overall phenotypic selection on genetic change at individual loci. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  David L. Young,et al.  Deep mutational scanning of an RRM domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A)-binding protein , 2013, RNA.

[24]  Kelly M. Thayer,et al.  Analyses of the effects of all ubiquitin point mutants on yeast growth rate. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[26]  Fyodor A Kondrashov,et al.  A model of substitution trajectories in sequence space and long-term protein evolution. , 2015, Molecular biology and evolution.

[27]  Matthew B. Taylor,et al.  Higher-order genetic interactions and their contribution to complex traits. , 2015, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  R. Milkman Selection differentials and selection coefficients. , 1978, Genetics.