Halogen and LED light curing of composite: temperature increase and Knoop hardness

This study assessed the Knoop hardness and temperature increase provided by three light curing units when using (1) the manufacturers’ recommended times of photo-activation and (2) standardizing total energy density. One halogen – XL2500 (3M/ESPE) – and two light-emitting diode (LED) curing units – Freelight (3M/ESPE) and Ultrablue IS (DMC) – were used. A type-K thermocouple registered the temperature change produced by the composite photo-activation in a mold. Twenty-four hours after the photo-activation procedures, the composite specimens were submitted to a hardness test. Both temperature increase and hardness data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5% significance). Using the first set of photo-activation conditions, the halogen unit produced a statistically higher temperature increase than did both LED units, and the Freelight LED resulted in a lower hardness than did the other curing units. When applying the second set of photo-activation conditions, the two LED units produced statistically greater temperature increase than did the halogen unit, whereas there were no statistical differences in hardness among the curing units.

[1]  R. Nomoto Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of light-cured resins. , 1997, Dental materials journal.

[2]  R. Scotti,et al.  Clinical and histological evaluation of thermal injury thresholds in human teeth: a preliminary study. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  L. Watanabe,et al.  Measurement of temperature generated by visible-light-cure lamps in an in vitro model. , 1989, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  J. Ferracane Current trends in dental composites. , 1995, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[5]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of specimen diameter on the relationship between subsurface depth and hardness of a light-cured resin composite. , 2003, European journal of oral sciences.

[6]  L. F. Schneider,et al.  Temperature change and hardness with different resin composites and photo-activation methods. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[7]  K. Jandt,et al.  Polymerization and light-induced heat of dental composites cured with LED and halogen technology. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[8]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Effect of energy density on properties and marginal integrity of posterior resin composite restorations. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  J. Čejková,et al.  UV Rays, the prooxidant/antioxidant imbalance in the cornea and oxidative eye damage. , 2004, Physiological research.

[11]  F Rueggeberg,et al.  Contemporary issues in photocuring. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[12]  J Sutalo,et al.  Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Stansbury Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[14]  A. Yap,et al.  Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[15]  C. Davidson,et al.  Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  R. Loney,et al.  Temperature transmission of high-output light-curing units through dentin. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[17]  P. Andreou,et al.  Knoop hardness of ten resin composites irradiated with high-power LED and quartz-tungsten-halogen lights. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[18]  C. Bowman,et al.  The effect of light intensity on double bond conversion and flexural strength of a model, unfilled dental resin. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  E Harrington,et al.  Temperature rise during polymerization of light-activated resin composites. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[20]  A. Shortall,et al.  Thermal changes and cure depths associated with a high intensity light activation unit. , 2004, E -journal of dentistry.

[21]  E. Asmussen Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[22]  A. N. Cranin,et al.  Neurofibromatosis of the oral cavity. , 1963, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[23]  J L Ferracane,et al.  A Comparison of Four Modes of Evaluating Depth of Cure of Light-activated Composites , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[24]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Correlation of Parameters used to Estimate Monomer Conversion in a Light-cured Composite , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[25]  L ZACH,et al.  PULP RESPONSE TO EXTERNALLY APPLIED HEAT. , 1965, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[26]  M. Hannig,et al.  In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing sources. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Shedding new light on composite polymerization. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[28]  L. Cavalcante,et al.  Pulp chamber temperature changes during resin composite photo-activation , 2005 .

[29]  V. Bagnato,et al.  Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.