Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Genome size is a function, and the product, of cell volume. As such it is contingent on ecological circumstance. The nature of 'this ecological circumstance' is, however, hotly debated. Here, we investigate for angiosperms whether stomatal size may be this 'missing link': the primary determinant of genome size. Stomata are crucial for photosynthesis and their size affects functional efficiency. METHODS Stomatal and leaf characteristics were measured for 1442 species from Argentina, Iran, Spain and the UK and, using PCA, some emergent ecological and taxonomic patterns identified. Subsequently, an assessment of the relationship between genome-size values obtained from the Plant DNA C-values database and measurements of stomatal size was carried out. KEY RESULTS Stomatal size is an ecologically important attribute. It varies with life-history (woody species < herbaceous species < vernal geophytes) and contributes to ecologically and physiologically important axes of leaf specialization. Moreover, it is positively correlated with genome size across a wide range of major taxa. CONCLUSIONS Stomatal size predicts genome size within angiosperms. Correlation is not, however, proof of causality and here our interpretation is hampered by unexpected deficiencies in the scientific literature. Firstly, there are discrepancies between our own observations and established ideas about the ecological significance of stomatal size; very large stomata, theoretically facilitating photosynthesis in deep shade, were, in this study (and in other studies), primarily associated with vernal geophytes of unshaded habitats. Secondly, the lower size limit at which stomata can function efficiently, and the ecological circumstances under which these minute stomata might occur, have not been satisfactorally resolved. Thus, our hypothesis, that the optimization of stomatal size for functional efficiency is a major ecological determinant of genome size, remains unproven.

[1]  J. P. Grime,et al.  NUCLEAR DNA CONTENTS, SHOOT PHENOLOGY AND SPECIES CO-EXISTENCE IN A LIMESTONE GRASSLAND COMMUNITY , 1985 .

[2]  K. Thompson,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[3]  David C. Tank,et al.  An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: , 2009 .

[4]  T. Cavalier-smith.  Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[5]  S. Waldron,et al.  The contribution of insect prey to the total nitrogen content of sundews (Drosera spp.) determined in situ by stable isotope analysis. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[6]  V. Schubert,et al.  Nuclear DNA content and nuclear and cell volume are positively correlated in angiosperms , 2006, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[7]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[8]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Eukaryotic genome size databases , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[10]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Smallest angiosperm genomes found in lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size. , 2006, Plant biology.

[11]  R. W. Pearcy,et al.  Stomatal behavior and photosynthetic performance under dynamic light regimes in a seasonally dry tropical rain forest , 2000, Oecologia.

[12]  T. Cavalier-smith.  The Evolution of genome size , 1985 .

[13]  A. Meister,et al.  Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size , 2003 .

[14]  H. Puchta,et al.  Species‐specific double‐strand break repair and genome evolution in plants , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[15]  G. Aronne,et al.  Seasonal Dimorphism in the Mediterranean Cistus incanus L. subsp. incanus , 2001 .

[16]  S. Sugiyama.  Developmental basis of interspecific differences in leaf size and specific leaf area among C3 grass species , 2005 .

[17]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  The Mechanical Diversity of Stomata and Its Significance in Gas-Exchange Control[OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[18]  K. Thompson,et al.  The Ecology of Seeds: References , 2005 .

[19]  Gerhard Thiel,et al.  Guard cells elongate: relationship of volume and surface area during stomatal movement. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .

[21]  N. Kutsuna,et al.  Intra-vacuolar reserves of membranes during stomatal closure: the possible role of guard cell vacuoles estimated by 3-D reconstruction. , 2007, Plant & cell physiology.

[22]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[23]  E. Garnier,et al.  A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content , 2001 .

[24]  D. Petrov,et al.  The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[25]  K. Thimann,et al.  The dependence of stomatal closure on protein synthesis. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[26]  J. Dickie,et al.  Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[27]  H. Dijkstra,et al.  The length of stomata as an indicator for polyploidy in rye-grasses , 1965, Euphytica.

[28]  M. Fricker,et al.  VOLUME MEASUREMENT OF GUARD-CELL VACUOLES DURING STOMATAL MOVEMENTS USING CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY , 1990 .

[29]  M. Chase,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae) , 2003 .

[30]  H. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf,et al.  Functional leaf anatomy , 1993 .

[31]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Comparative Plant Ecology , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[32]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Variation in nuclear DNA content across environmental gradients: a quantile regression analysis , 2002 .

[33]  D. Beerling,et al.  Stomatal Density as an Indicator of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration , 1992 .

[34]  E. Garnier,et al.  Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1994 .

[35]  R. N. Jones,et al.  Chromosome evolution and DNA variation in Crepis , 1976, Heredity.

[36]  T. Gregory,et al.  The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. , 2003, Genome.

[37]  F. Woodward,et al.  The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change , 2003, Nature.

[38]  M. Charles,et al.  FIBS in archaeobotany : Functional Interpretation of weed floras in relation to husbandry practices , 1997 .

[39]  R. L. Csiro,et al.  Transport of gases into leaves , 1983 .

[40]  J. Raven.  Selection pressures on stomatal evolution. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[41]  Peter J. Grubb,et al.  Physiological basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annuals , 1993 .

[42]  M. Bennett,et al.  DNA amount, latitude, and crop plant distribution , 1976 .

[43]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Variation in genome size—an ecological interpretation , 1982, Nature.

[44]  K. Thompson.  Genome size, seed size and germination temperature in herbaceous angiosperms. , 1990 .

[45]  M. Bennett,et al.  Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[46]  Ken Thompson,et al.  The Ecology of Seeds by Michael Fenner , 2005 .

[47]  J. Hodgson,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATION OF DICOTYLEDONOUS FAMILIES WITHIN A LOCAL FLORA: SOME FACTORS CONSTRAINING OPTIMIZATION OF SEED SIZE AND THEIR POSSIBLE EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE , 1986 .

[48]  Ilia J Leitch,et al.  Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[49]  D. Lawlor.  Photosynthesis: Molecular, Physiological and Environmental Processes , 1987 .

[50]  H. Puchta,et al.  Different pathways of homologous recombination are used for the repair of double-strand breaks within tandemly arranged sequences in the plant genome. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[51]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[52]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Phylogeny of seed plants based on evidence from eight genes. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[53]  D. Hall.  Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment : a field and laboratory manual , 1993 .

[54]  J. Raven.  The minimum size of seeds and spores in relation to the ontogeny of homoiohydric plants , 1999 .

[55]  F. Crick,et al.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite , 1980, Nature.

[56]  Alexander E Vinogradov,et al.  Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[57]  K. Thompson,et al.  Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species , 2002 .

[58]  M. Bennett,et al.  The duration of meiosis , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[59]  M. G. Kidwell,et al.  Transposable elements and the evolution of genome size in eukaryotes , 2002, Genetica.

[60]  Jane Masterson,et al.  Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms , 1994, Science.

[61]  Ken Thompson,et al.  The Ecology of Seeds: Contents , 2005 .

[62]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Why Do Temperate Deciduous Trees Leaf Out at Different Times? Adaptation and Ecology of Forest Communities , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[63]  J. Endrizzi,et al.  CELL SIZE, NUCLEAR SIZE AND DNA CONTENT RELATIONSHIPS IN GOSSYPIUM , 1975 .

[64]  M. Chase,et al.  A linear sequence of Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II families , 2007 .

[65]  A. C. Martin,et al.  Comparative internal morphology of seeds , 1946 .

[66]  M. Chase,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF DNA C-VALUES PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR A SMALL ANCESTRAL GENOME SIZE IN FLOWERING PLANTS , 1998 .

[67]  P. Raven.  The Bases of Angiosperm Phylogeny: Cytology , 1975 .

[68]  R. Britten,et al.  Organization, Transcription, and Regulation in the Animal Genome , 1973, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[69]  Z. Chen,et al.  Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[70]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[71]  D. Soltis,et al.  Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. , 2003, American journal of botany.

[72]  D. Soltis,et al.  Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (embryophyta). , 2005, Annals of botany.

[73]  Peter F. Stevens,et al.  The Linear Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (LAPG) III: A linear sequence of the families in APG III , 2009 .

[74]  G. Caetano-Anollés.  Evolution of Genome Size in the Grasses , 2005 .

[75]  F. I. Woodward,et al.  Do plants really need stomata , 1998 .

[76]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Stomatal cell length and ploidy level in four taxa belonging to the Phleum sect. Phleum. , 2000 .