SURROGATE MODELLING OF LIQUID STORAGE TANKS FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT

The finite element method (FEM) is often employed to create detailed models for the seismic assessment and design of liquid storage tanks. This comprehensive approach offers accuracy, which is counter-balanced however by its computational inefficiency, especially for the case of large-scale engineering problems. Regardless of the continuous evolution of com- puter technology, surrogate models are necessary when such problems of engineering practice are encountered. This study, attempts to develop an appropriate surrogate modelling approach, tailored for the design and seismic risk assessment of liquid storage tanks. A formulation that disregards fluid-structure-interaction is employed in view of providing a reasonable compro- mise between modelling complexity and error. At the same time, a simplified methodology based on nonlinear static procedures is proposed for the assessment of atmospheric tanks. The comparison with Incremental Dynamic Analysis reveals a reasonable, yet conservative in some cases, match for the damage states considered, thus offering an alternative methodology that may easily be incorporated within code-based provisions.

[1]  Alain Nussbaumer,et al.  Cyclic demand at the shell-bottom connection of unanchored steel tanks , 2012 .

[2]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation , 2011 .

[3]  Dimitrios VAMVATSIKOS,et al.  SEISMIC RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF LIQUID STORAGE TANKS , 2014 .

[4]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[5]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  SURROGATE MODELLING AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF STEEL LIQUID STORAGE TANKS , 2014 .

[6]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[7]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Seismic Response of Unanchored Liquid Storage Tanks , 2013 .

[8]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probabilistic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performance‐based design , 2007 .

[9]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[10]  P. K. Malhotra,et al.  Uplifting Analysis of Base Plates in Cylindrical Tanks , 1994 .

[11]  P. K. Malhotra,et al.  Uplifting Response of Unanchored Liquid-Storage Tanks , 1994 .

[12]  George D. Manolis,et al.  Risk analysis of industrial structures under extreme transient loads , 2004 .

[13]  P. K. Malhotra,et al.  Beam Model for Base‐Uplifting Analysis of Cylindrical Tanks , 1994 .

[14]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  Seismic design of storage tanks , 1986 .

[15]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Seismic Response of Soil-Supported Unanchored Liquid-Storage Tanks , 1997 .

[16]  A. Veletsos,et al.  Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motions , 1975 .

[17]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Simple Procedure for Seismic Analysis of Liquid-Storage Tanks , 2000 .