A flexible, integrated system for generating meteorological surfaces derived from point sources across multiple geographic scales

Abstract The generation of meteorological surfaces from point-source data is a difficult but necessary step required for modeling ecological and hydrological processes across landscapes. To date, procedures to acquire, transform, and display meteorological information geographically have been specifically tailored to individual studies. Here we offer a flexible, integrated system that employs a relational database to store point information, a modular system incorporating a choice of weather data interpolation methods, and a matrix inversion method that speeds computer calculations to display information on grids of any specified size, all with minimal user intervention. We demonstrate the power of this integrated approach by cross-validating projected daily meteorological surfaces derived from ∼1200 weather stations distributed across the continental United States for a year. We performed cross-validations for five meteorological variables (solar radiation, minimum and maximum temperatures, humidity, and precipitation) with a truncated Gaussian filter, ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting and achieved comparable success among all interpolation methods. Cross-validation computation time for ordinary kriging was reduced from 1 h to 3 min when we incorporated the matrix inversion method. We demonstrated the system's flexibility by displaying results at 8-km resolution for the continental USA and at one-degree resolution for the globe.

[1]  Michael F. Hutchinson,et al.  Interpolation of Rainfall Data with Thin Plate Smoothing Splines - Part I: Two Dimensional Smoothing of Data with Short Range Correlation , 1998 .

[2]  M. Serreze,et al.  Geographic patterns and dynamics of Alaskan climate interpolated from a sparse station record , 2000, Global change biology.

[3]  C. Tucker,et al.  Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999 , 2003, Science.

[4]  S. Running,et al.  Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. , 2000, Science.

[5]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Data input quality and resolution effects on regional and local scale Eucalyptus globulus productivity predictions in north-east Tasmania , 2002 .

[6]  P. Goovaerts.  Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall , 2000 .

[7]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Testing scale dependent assumptions in regional ecosystem simulations , 1994 .

[8]  John O. Carter,et al.  Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Biospheric Monitoring and Ecological Forecasting , 2003 .

[10]  A. Ehrenberg.  Environmental biophysics. , 1977, Acta biochimica et biophysica; Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.

[11]  Oswald Marinoni,et al.  Improving geological models using a combined ordinary–indicator kriging approach , 2003 .

[12]  T. Skaugen.  Classification of rainfall into small- and large-scale events by statistical pattern recognition , 1997 .

[13]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[14]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[15]  S. Running,et al.  Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: incorporating hillslope hydrology , 1993 .

[16]  G. Campbell,et al.  On the relationship between incoming solar radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperature , 1984 .

[17]  A. Comrie,et al.  Variability and spatial modeling of fine-scale precipitation data for the Sonoran Desert of south-west Arizona , 2002 .

[18]  R. Barry,et al.  Atmosphere, Weather and Climate , 1968 .

[19]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data , 2000 .

[20]  N. Coops,et al.  Assessing forest growth across southwestern Oregon under a range of current and future global change scenarios using a process model, 3‐PG , 2001 .

[21]  Steven W. Running,et al.  The effects of aggregating sub-grid land surface variation on large-scale estimates of net primary production , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  S. Running,et al.  An improved method for estimating surface humidity from daily minimum temperature , 1997 .

[23]  Alexey A. Voinov,et al.  Modular ecosystem modeling , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..