Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms

With the program HistCite™ it is possible to generate and visualize the most relevant papers in a set of documents retrieved from the Science Citation Index. Historical reconstructions of scientific developments can be represented chronologically as developments in networks of citation relations extracted from scientific literature. This study aims to go beyond the historical reconstruction of scientific knowledge, enriching the output of HistCite™ with algorithms from social-network analysis and information theory. Using main-path analysis, it is possible to highlight the structural backbone in the development of a scientific field. The expected information value of the message can be used to indicate whether change in the distribution (of citations) has occurred to such an extent that a path-dependency is generated. This provides us with a measure of evolutionary change between subsequent documents. The “forgetting and rewriting” of historically prior events at the research front can thus be indicated. These three methods—HistCite, main path and path dependent transitions—are applied to a set of documents related to fullerenes and the fullerene-like structures known as nanotubes. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Historiographs, Librarianship and the History of Science , 1974 .

[2]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications , 2001 .

[3]  Yuko Fujigaki,et al.  Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists' everyday activities: applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge , 1998 .

[4]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Discovering evolutionary theme patterns from text: an exploration of temporal text mining , 2005, KDD '05.

[5]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Why do we need algorithmic historiography? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates , 1971 .

[7]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[8]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[9]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[10]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactions , 2005, Scientometrics.

[12]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Mapping the Output of Topical Searches in the Web of Knowledge and the Case of Watson-Crick , 2003 .

[13]  J. A. Stewart,et al.  Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles , 1983 .

[14]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[15]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[16]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  The evolution of a citation network topology:The development of the journal Scientometrics , 2006 .

[17]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Dimensions of Citation Analysis , 1990 .

[18]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913–1997) , 2000, 1001.1312.

[19]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE , 1964 .

[20]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Similarity Measures, Author Cocitation Analysis, and Information Theory , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[22]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations. The chance for citedness model , 1996, Scientometrics.

[23]  A. Schubert,et al.  Literature of Analytical Chemistry: A Scientometric Evaluation , 1986 .

[24]  Simone Santini,et al.  Similarity Measures , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Between Texts and Contexts: Advances in Theories of Citation? (A Rejoinder) , 1999 .

[26]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[27]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[28]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Web site design with the patron in mind: A step-by-step guide for libraries , 2006 .

[29]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexes in sociological and historical research , 1963 .

[30]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic citation-linked historiography - Mapping the literature of science , 2005, ASIST.

[31]  P. Wouters.  The citation culture , 1999 .

[32]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis , 2003, ArXiv.

[33]  Miguel Campanario,et al.  Consolation for the Scientist: Sometimes it is Hard to Publish Papers that are Later Highly-Cited , 1993 .

[34]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics, Research Policy (forthcoming). , 2006 .

[35]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Scientific Influence , 1993 .

[36]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Teletraffic conferences: Studying a field of engineering science , 1989, Scientometrics.

[37]  R. Burt.  Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[38]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[39]  Diana Lucio-Arias,et al.  Knowledge emergence in scientific communication: from “fullerenes” to “nanotubes” , 2007, Scientometrics.

[40]  D. H. Freeman.  Statistical Decomposition Analysis , 1974 .

[41]  V. M. Efremenkova,et al.  Information Resources for Evaluating the Development of Research Direction—‘Fullerenes’ , 2006 .

[42]  Yuko Fujigaki,et al.  The citation system: Citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation , 1998, Scientometrics.

[43]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures II: Toward a Macro- and Microstructure for Science , 1974 .