Research on instructional development

The instructional technology field is periodically faced with discussion of the appropriate direction of its research and more specifically of the relationship between research and practice. This paper extends the discussion by examining the nature and scope of developmental research. Two categories of developmental research are explored. They vary in terms of the extent to which the conclusions resulting from the research are generalizable or contextually-specific. Type 1 research tends to be case studies of specific design, development, or evaluation projects with its findings directed toward the improvement of a product or identification of those conditions conducive to efficient product development and use. Type 2 research typically addresses the validity and/or effectiveness of an existing or newly constructed development model, process, or technique. The promise of developmental research as a vehicle for creating sound methods for linking research and practice is discussed.

[1]  D C Pelz,et al.  Creative Tensions in the Research and Development Climate , 1967, Science.

[2]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Cognitively based models of courseware development , 1992 .

[3]  Anthony Ernest Pizzuto The development and evaluation of a simulation game demonstrating diffusion communications in a corporate organization , 1982 .

[4]  Robert Heinich,et al.  Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction / by Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, James , 1982 .

[5]  John A. Ellis,et al.  An evaluation of instructional systems development in the Navy , 1991 .

[6]  Wayne A. Nelson Selection and utilization of problem information by instructional designers , 1988 .

[7]  J. Keller Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design , 1987 .

[8]  Barbara A. Petry,et al.  Systematic development of an applied phonetics course , 1984 .

[9]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Current progress and future directions for research in instructional technology , 1989 .

[10]  Norman Higgins,et al.  Perspectives on educational technology research and development , 1989 .

[11]  Robert Heinich,et al.  The proper study of instructional technology , 1984 .

[12]  L. Briggs,et al.  Instructional Design: Principles and Applications , 1991 .

[13]  Barbara Seels,et al.  Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field , 1994 .

[14]  Marcy P. Driscoll,et al.  The Rational Set Generator: A Method for Creating Concept Examples for Teaching and Testing. , 1985 .

[15]  Nina Link,et al.  Research and development of print materials at the Children's Television Workshop , 1990 .

[16]  Stephen M. Alessi Learning interactive videodisc development: A case study , 1988 .

[17]  Walter Dick,et al.  Analytical and empirical comparisons of the journal of instructional development and educational communication and technology journal , 1989 .

[18]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia , 1993 .

[19]  James D. Finn,et al.  Professionalizing the audio-visual field , 1953 .

[20]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control , 1989 .

[21]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Educational technology at the crossroads: New mindsets and new directions , 1989 .

[22]  Karen O'Quin,et al.  Effectiveness of a microcomputer-training workshop for college professionals , 1987 .

[23]  D. Jonassen Using needs assessment data to design a graduate instructional development program , 1988 .

[24]  Rita Richey Designing Instruction for the Adult Learner: Systemic Training Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[25]  Dennis Bowers,et al.  HyperCard in educational research: an introduction and case study , 1990 .