Implicit Learning of Viewpoint-Independent Spatial Layouts

We usually perceive things in our surroundings as unchanged despite viewpoint changes caused by self-motion. The visual system therefore must have a function to process objects independently of viewpoint. In this study, we examined whether viewpoint-independent spatial layout can be obtained implicitly. For this purpose, we used a contextual cueing effect, a learning effect of spatial layout in visual search displays known to be an implicit effect. We investigated the transfer of the contextual cueing effect to images from a different viewpoint by using visual search displays of 3D objects. For images from a different viewpoint, the contextual cueing effect was maintained with self-motion but disappeared when the display changed without self-motion. This indicates that there is an implicit learning effect in environment-centered coordinates and suggests that the spatial representation of object layouts can be obtained and updated implicitly. We also showed that binocular disparity plays an important role in the layout representations.

[1]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Novel-view scene recognition relies on identifying spatial reference directions , 2009, Cognition.

[2]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information , 2007, Psychological research.

[4]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Updating in Models of Spatial Memory , 2006, Spatial Cognition.

[5]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[6]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Active and passive scene recognition across views , 1999, Cognition.

[7]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory , 2004, Cognition.

[8]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[9]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  Reza Modarres,et al.  Spatial memory during progressive disorientation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Spatial updating according to a fixed reference direction of a briefly viewed layout , 2011, Cognition.

[12]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Recognition memory of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[15]  David Waller,et al.  Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: Effects of the number of objects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Sylvain Gagnon,et al.  Is egocentric space automatically encoded? , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[18]  N. R. Ellis,et al.  Is memory for spatial location automatically encoded? , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[19]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[21]  D. Waller,et al.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: Evidence from scene recognition , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[23]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Representation and perception of scenic layout , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[25]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  T. McNamara,et al.  Symmetry and Asymmetry of Human Spatial Memory , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  M. Masson,et al.  Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[30]  W. Hayward,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability , 2000, Psychological science.

[31]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[32]  S. Shioiri,et al.  Useful Resolution for Picture Perception as a Function of Eccentricity , 1989, Perception.

[33]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[34]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .

[35]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Coding of spatial location information: an automatic process? , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  E. D. Burgund,et al.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  J. Thomson,et al.  Automatic Spatial Updating during Locomotion without Vision , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[39]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Human navigation in nested environments. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  N. Burgess,et al.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  David Waller,et al.  Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Priming of simple and complex scene layout: rapid function from the intermediate level. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.