Experience feedback in product lifecycle management

Abstract Given the popularity of industrial enterprises for Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) information systems capable of supporting the entire product development process, we see the emergence of new needs and new research directions in the operation of these dynamic complex environments. Reference standards are applicable to the services and industries which bring innovation and technologies to a fast-growing and demanding market. To obtain perfect control of business risks and performance and to ensure “zero defect”, standards specific to the fields of transport, emergency (IRIS IN 9100 …) and generic standards (ISO 9001 …) are more restrictive. They involve full transparency and rigor in flawless quality management processes and monitoring products. In this field, knowledge management is paramount; it helps improve overall performance of industrial systems by structuring the information assets acquired by the company stakeholders. In a way, it is the substantive development of our research. We detailed the approach adopted to implement the Experience Feedback (EF) system dedicated to the product in the PLM business. We presented a first action with the objective of formalizing the implicit experiences generated following the response to a triggering event. In this work, we mainly considered negative events for which the information to be collected are clearly identified. We propose an approach combining Problem Solving and EF adapting the level of commitment to the criticality or importance of the problem addressed. To instantiate this approach in PLM, we have chosen to rely on the Change Management Process (CMP) because, firstly, it involves changes in product data and, secondly, it usually concerns driving developments for correction or improvement of the technical specifications related to the production process.

[1]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What does PLMS (product lifecycle management systems) manage: Data or documents? Complementarity and contingency for SMEs , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[2]  Bernard Kamsu-Foguem,et al.  Knowledge formalization in experience feedback processes: An ontology-based approach , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[3]  Bernard Grabot,et al.  Generating knowledge in maintenance from Experience Feedback , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Sustainable PLM through Intelligent Products , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  David W. Aha,et al.  Intelligent delivery of military lessons learned , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  John Meiling,et al.  Managing for continuous improvement in off‐site construction: Evaluation of lean management principles , 2012 .

[7]  Bernard Kamsu-Foguem,et al.  Knowledge reuse integrating the collaboration from experts in industrial maintenance management , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[8]  Bernard Kamsu-Foguem,et al.  Continuous improvement through knowledge-guided analysis in experience feedback , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[9]  J. L. Coze Disasters and Organisations: From Lessons Learnt to Theorising , 2008 .

[10]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Global Approach for Technical Data Management Application to Ship Equipment Part Families , 2009 .

[11]  Roberto Boselli,et al.  A model-based evaluation of data quality activities in KDD , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[12]  Brigitte Chebel-Morello,et al.  Reutilization of diagnostic cases by adaptation of knowledge models , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[14]  Laurent Geneste,et al.  Elaboration and Exploitation of Lessons Learned , 2002, Intelligent Information Processing.

[15]  Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux,et al.  An architecture for knowledge evolution in organisations , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Intelligent lessons learned systems , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Rose Dieng-Kuntz,et al.  Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories , 2012, Springer US.

[18]  Niels Henrik Mortensen,et al.  PLM system support for modular product development , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[19]  Nada Matta,et al.  Knowledge representation for an efficient re-use of project memory , 2011 .

[20]  Agnar Aamodt,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches , 1994, AI Commun..

[21]  Jing Xu,et al.  Knowledge evaluation in product lifecycle design and support , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..