A Framework for Distributional Formal Semantics

Formal semantics and distributional semantics offer complementary strengths in capturing the meaning of natural language. As such, a considerable amount of research has sought to unify them, either by augmenting formal semantic systems with a distributional component, or by defining a formal system on top of distributed representations. Arriving at such a unified framework has, however, proven extremely challenging. One reason for this is that formal and distributional semantics operate on a fundamentally different ‘representational currency’: formal semantics defines meaning in terms of models of the world, whereas distributional semantics defines meaning in terms of linguistic co-occurrence. Here, we pursue an alternative approach by deriving a vector space model that defines meaning in a distributed manner relative to formal models of the world. We will show that the resulting Distributional Formal Semantics offers probabilistic distributed representations that are also inherently compositional, and that naturally capture quantification and entailment. We moreover show that, when used as part of a neural network model, these representations allow for capturing incremental meaning construction and probabilistic inferencing. This framework thus lays the groundwork for an integrated distributional and formal approach to meaning.

[1]  Mathieu Koppen,et al.  Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[4]  Andrew Y. Ng,et al.  Semantic Compositionality through Recursive Matrix-Vector Spaces , 2012, EMNLP.

[5]  G. Frege Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[6]  Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh,et al.  Experimental Support for a Categorical Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2011, EMNLP.

[7]  Stefan Thater,et al.  A Crowdsourced Database of Event Sequence Descriptions for the Acquisition of High-quality Script Knowledge , 2016, LREC.

[8]  I. Rooij,et al.  Connectionist semantic systematicity , 2009, Cognition.

[9]  David C. Plaut,et al.  A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production , 2002 .

[10]  Katrin Erk,et al.  What do you know about an alligator when you know the company it keeps , 2016 .

[11]  Johan Bos,et al.  Discourse Semantics with Information Structure , 2018, J. Semant..

[12]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing , 2016, Cognitive science.

[13]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Sentence Comprehension as Mental Simulation: An Information-Theoretic Perspective , 2011, Inf..

[14]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  Expectation-based Comprehension: Modeling the Interaction of World Knowledge and Linguistic Experience , 2019 .

[15]  Gemma Boleda,et al.  Formal Distributional Semantics: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2016, CL.

[16]  Richard M. Golden,et al.  A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall , 1993 .

[17]  Marco Baroni,et al.  Nouns are Vectors, Adjectives are Matrices: Representing Adjective-Noun Constructions in Semantic Space , 2010, EMNLP.

[18]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Mathematical Foundations for a Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning , 2010, ArXiv.

[19]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory , 1997, Neural Computation.

[20]  Marco Baroni,et al.  Frege in Space: A Program of Compositional Distributional Semantics , 2014 .

[21]  Johan Bos,et al.  The Groningen Meaning Bank , 2013, JSSP.