An integrated method for evaluating the remanufacturability of used machine tool

Abstract A growing concern about the environment, and especially about the waste, carbon emissions and landfill, has spurred research into the field of remanufacturing. Remanufacturing which is defined as the ultimate form of recycling can restore the used products of high value-added, with great advantages of energy saving and emission-reduction. As the typical production equipment, machine tool is of great recycling value and potential for remanufacturing. Whether the used machine tool can be remanufactured depends on its remanufacturability. An integrated method for evaluating the remanufacturability of used machine tool is proposed, in which the technology feasibility, economic feasibility and environmental benefits of machine tool remanufacturing are analyzed. The technology feasibility should be evaluated in terms of the feasibility of all remanufacturing processes, including disassembly, cleaning, inspection and sorting, part reconditioning, machine upgrading and reassembly. The economic feasibility is evaluated from aspect of remanufacturing cost. The environmental benefits of machine tool remanufacturing can be evaluated in terms of energy saving, material saving and pollution reduction. In addition, the weight of each index is determined by the AHP method. Finally, the method is applied to the remanufacturing process of used planer B2025 to examine its feasibility and validity.

[1]  Fei Liu,et al.  A stochastic dynamic programming based model for uncertain production planning of re-manufacturing system , 2009 .

[2]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  MANAGING PRODUCT RETURNS FOR REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .

[3]  Rizauddin Ramli,et al.  Disassemblability of end-of-life vehicle: a critical review of evaluation methods , 2011 .

[4]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Aftermarket remanufacturing strategic planning decision-making framework: theory & practice , 2010 .

[5]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  The Value of Quality Grading in Remanufacturing , 2009 .

[6]  Aviad Shapira,et al.  AHP-Based Weighting of Factors Affecting Safety on Construction Sites with Tower Cranes , 2009 .

[7]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Onur Kaya,et al.  Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Peggy Zwolinski,et al.  Integrated design of remanufacturable products based on product profiles , 2006 .

[10]  Margot J. Hutchins,et al.  An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions , 2008 .

[11]  V. Guide Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs , 2000 .

[12]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[13]  D. Huisingh,et al.  Remanufacturing for the automotive aftermarket-strategic factors: literature review and future research needs , 2009 .

[14]  H J Parkinson,et al.  Analysis and taxonomy of remanufacturing industry practice , 2003 .

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[16]  Mehmet Ali Ilgin,et al.  Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[18]  Michael R. Johnson Evaluating remanufacturing and demanufacturing for extended producer responsibility and sustainable product management. , 2002 .

[19]  Ravi Subramanian,et al.  Product Design and Supply Chain Coordination Under Extended Producer Responsibility , 2008 .

[20]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[21]  M. Matsumoto,et al.  A study on remanufacturing businesses in Japan , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.