Bone Cells Grown on Micropatterned Surfaces are More Sensitive to Fluid Shear Stress

Bone has the ability to adapt its structure to meet its mechanical environment. In spite of great efforts to understand the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, little is known about bone mechanotransduction at the cellular level. In this work, we propose that there is an interaction between the architecture of the cell and mechanosensitivity. Specifically, we hypothesized that cell spreading plays an important role in bone cell mechanotransduction. To test our hypothesis, we utilized micropatterned surfaces that allowed us to control the degree of cell spreading. Focal adhesion area is also known to depend on cell spreading. Thus patterns were utilized that maintained a constant total adhesive contact area, but permitted differing degrees of spreading. MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts cultured on these patterned surfaces were exposed to dynamic fluid shear stress. The fluid flow-induced changes in intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i were determined as a function of the degree of spreading. Cells grown on micropatterned surfaces were more responsive in general than those grown on traditional unpatterned surfaces. Interestingly, however, we found that cells with a higher degree of spreading were less responsive to mechanical loading. This work provides new insights into the interplay of cellular structure and mechanotransduction.

[1]  H J Donahue,et al.  Substrate deformation levels associated with routine physical activity are less stimulatory to bone cells relative to loading-induced oscillatory fluid flow. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Micro- and nano-patterned substrates to manipulate cell adhesion. , 2007, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[3]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[4]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[5]  H J Donahue,et al.  Differential effect of steady versus oscillating flow on bone cells. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  J. Jansen,et al.  The effect of combined cyclic mechanical stretching and microgrooved surface topography on the behavior of fibroblasts. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  H. Donahue,et al.  Oscillating fluid flow activation of gap junction hemichannels induces atp release from MLO‐Y4 osteocytes , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[8]  Toshio Matsumoto,et al.  Transcriptional Induction of FosB/ΔFosB Gene by Mechanical Stress in Osteoblasts* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Jun Wang,et al.  Effects of mechanical pressure on intracellular calcium release channel and cytoskeletal structure in rabbit mandibular condylar chondrocytes. , 2006, Life sciences.

[10]  L. Claes,et al.  Interfacial shear strength of titanium implants in bone is significantly improved by surface topographies with high pit density and microroughness. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[11]  T. Adachi,et al.  Directional dependence of osteoblastic calcium response to mechanical stimuli , 2003, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[12]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  Tony M Keaveny,et al.  Adaptation of cellular mechanical behavior to mechanical loading for osteoblastic cells. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  S. Ponik,et al.  Fluid shear stress induction of COX-2 protein and prostaglandin release in cultured MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts does not require intact microfilaments or microtubules. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Ron Y Kwon,et al.  The role of actin cytoskeleton in oscillatory fluid flow-induced signaling in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Intracellular calcium waves in bone cell networks under single cell nanoindentation. , 2006, Molecular & cellular biomechanics : MCB.

[17]  A. Curtis,et al.  Microtopography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton, and adhesion , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  M. Diniz,et al.  Surface topography modulates the osteogenesis in human bone marrow cell cultures grown on titanium samples prepared by a combination of mechanical and acid treatments , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell–matrix adhesion , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[20]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[21]  H J Donahue,et al.  Osteopontin Gene Regulation by Oscillatory Fluid Flow via Intracellular Calcium Mobilization and Activation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase in MC3T3–E1 Osteoblasts* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  R. Adam,et al.  Calcium regulates the PI3K‐Akt pathway in stretched osteoblasts , 2003, FEBS letters.

[23]  Ian A. Coe,et al.  Oscillatory fluid flow affects human marrow stromal cell proliferation and differentiation , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  Richard O Hynes,et al.  Integrins Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines , 2002, Cell.

[25]  P. Wilshaw,et al.  Formation of highly adherent nano-porous alumina on Ti-based substrates: a novel bone implant coating , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[26]  D. Ayers,et al.  Osteoblast differentiation onto different biometals with an endoprosthetic surface topography in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  Katsuya Sato,et al.  Measurement of local strain on cell membrane at initiation point of calcium signaling response to applied mechanical stimulus in osteoblastic cells. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  N. Shrive,et al.  Osteoblast-like cells and fluid flow: cytoskeleton-dependent shear sensitivity. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[29]  N. Chen,et al.  Fluid shear-induced NFkappaB translocation in osteoblasts is mediated by intracellular calcium release. , 2003, Bone.

[30]  S. Katz,et al.  Modulation of ERK 1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways by ATP in osteoblasts: involvement of mechanical stress-activated calcium influx, PKC and Src activation. , 2006, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[31]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[32]  C. Sukotjo,et al.  Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. , 2002, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[33]  Christopher R Jacobs,et al.  Time-dependent deformations in bone cells exposed to fluid flow in vitro: investigating the role of cellular deformation in fluid flow-induced signaling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Cell adhesion strengthening: contributions of adhesive area, integrin binding, and focal adhesion assembly. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.