A Disentangled Latent Space for Cross-Site MRI Harmonization

Accurate interpretation and quantification of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is vital to medical research and clinical practice. However, lack of MRI standardization and differences in acquisition protocols often lead to measurement inconsistencies across sites. Image harmonization techniques have been shown to improve qualitative and quantitative consistency between differently acquired scans. Unfortunately, these methods typically require paired training data from traveling subjects (for supervised methods) or assumptions about anatomical similarities between the populations (for unsupervised methods). We propose a deep learning-based harmonization technique with limited supervision for use in standardization across scanners and sites. By leveraging a disentangled latent space represented by a high-resolution anatomical information component (\(\beta \)) and a low-dimensional contrast component (\(\theta \)), the proposed method trains a cross-site harmonization model using databases of multi-modal image pairs acquired separately from each of the scanners to be harmonized. In this manuscript, we show that by using T\(_1\)-weighted and T\(_2\)-weighted images acquired from different subjects at three different sites, we can achieve a stable extraction of \(\beta \) with a continuous representation of \(\theta \). We also demonstrate that this allows cross-site harmonization without the need for paired data between sites.

[1]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[2]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  MR image synthesis by contrast learning on neighborhood ensembles , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Sina Honari,et al.  Distribution Matching Losses Can Hallucinate Features in Medical Image Translation , 2018, MICCAI.

[4]  Aaron Carass,et al.  DeepHarmony: A deep learning approach to contrast harmonization across scanner changes. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  François Rousseau,et al.  Brain Hallucination , 2008, ECCV.

[6]  D. Reich,et al.  Volumetric Analysis from a Harmonized Multisite Brain MRI Study of a Single Subject with Multiple Sclerosis , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  Russell T. Shinohara,et al.  Removing inter-subject technical variability in magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  A Compressed Sensing Approach for MR Tissue Contrast Synthesis , 2011, IPMI.

[9]  Rui Wang,et al.  Skeletal Shape Correspondence Through Entropy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[11]  Aaron Carass,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Intensity Normalization on MR Image Synthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[12]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  Variational intensity cross channel encoder for unsupervised vessel segmentation on OCT angiography , 2020, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[13]  Ben Poole,et al.  Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax , 2016, ICLR.

[14]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  J. Gee,et al.  The Insight ToolKit image registration framework , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[17]  Aaron Carass,et al.  Applications of a deep learning method for anti-aliasing and super-resolution in MRI. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[19]  Sotirios A. Tsaftaris,et al.  Multimodal MR Synthesis via Modality-Invariant Latent Representation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.