Are Creativity and Self-Efficacy at Odds? An Exploration in Variations of Product Dissection in Engineering Education

The purpose of product dissection is to teach students how a product works and provide them with inspiration for new ideas. However, little is known about how variations in dissection activities impact creative outcomes or engineering self-efficacy (ESE) and creative self-efficacies (CSE). This is important since the goal of engineering education is to produce capable and creative engineers. The current study was, thus, developed to address this research gap through a factorial experiment. The results showed that idea development was not impacted by dissection conditions but that ESE and CSE were increased through these activities. The results also showed that higher levels of CSE and ESE had alternate effects on novel idea development indicating they are at odds in engineering education.

[1]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[2]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice , 2009, CHI.

[3]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2009 .

[4]  Geoff Wright,et al.  Creating a Mindset for Innovation , 2012 .

[5]  D. Campbell.  Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[6]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Digital Product Repositories to Enhance Product Dissection Activities in the Classroom , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[7]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[8]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[9]  George M. Bodner,et al.  Factors Influencing the Self‐Efficacy Beliefs of First‐Year Engineering Students , 2006 .

[10]  Marios Papaevripidou,et al.  Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature , 2008 .

[11]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  Visual Inspection or Product Dissection? The Impact of Designer-Product Interactions on Engineering Design Creativity , 2013 .

[12]  A. Kazakçi,et al.  The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects. , 2014 .

[13]  Elizabeth M. Starkey,et al.  Piecing Together Product Dissection: How Dissection Conditions Impact Student Conceptual Understanding and Cognitive Load , 2018 .

[14]  B. W. Baetz,et al.  FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING BICYCLE DISSECTION AS AN INTRODUCTION TO SUSTAINABLE DESIGN , 2011 .

[15]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Product Evolution: A Reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology , 1998 .

[16]  John S. Lamancusa,et al.  The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum , 1997 .

[17]  Joshua E. Susskind.  PowerPoint's power in the classroom: enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[18]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[19]  Richard E. West,et al.  Innovation 101: Promoting Undergraduate Innovation Through a Two-Day Boot Camp , 2012 .

[20]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  Dissecting Creativity: How Dissection Virtuality, Analogical Distance, and Product Complexity Impact Creativity and Self-Efficacy , 2017 .

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  The impact of virtual product dissection environments on student design learning and self-efficacy , 2015 .

[22]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[23]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2012 .

[24]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Study on Situated Cognition: Product Dissection’s Effect on Redesign Activities , 2010 .

[25]  Ronald A. Beghetto,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students , 2006 .

[26]  Michelle L. Peters,et al.  EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CLASSROOM CLIMATE, SELF-EFFICACY, AND ACHIEVEMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS: A MULTI-LEVEL ANALYSIS , 2013 .

[27]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  David N. Rocheleau,et al.  Mechatronics/microcontroller education for mechanical engineering students at the University of South Carolina , 2005 .

[29]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[30]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  The Impact of Virtual Dissection on Engineering Student Learning and Self-Efficacy , 2014 .

[31]  T. Robbins,et al.  Playing with Thinkertoys to build creative abilities through online instruction , 2010 .

[32]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[33]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy.  E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[34]  C. Bray.  Transfer of learning. , 1928 .

[35]  Marian S. Kennedy,et al.  Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self‐Efficacy: A Validation Study , 2016 .

[36]  J. Farh,et al.  Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy , 2009 .

[37]  Judith Schweppe,et al.  Attention, Working Memory, and Long-Term Memory in Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Perspective Based on Process Models of Working Memory , 2014 .

[38]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[39]  Susan P. Besemer.  Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the Model Structure and a Comparison Among Products--Three Novel Chairs , 1998 .

[40]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Using Cyberinfrastructure to Enhance Product Dissection in the Classroom , 2007 .

[41]  Ahmed Ibrahim,et al.  Measuring undergraduate students' self-efficacy in engineering design in a project-based design course , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[42]  Duane F. Shell,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Mechanisms in Reading and Writing Achievement. , 1989 .

[43]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  T RANSFER OF LEARNING , 1992 .

[44]  Gro Ellen Mathisen,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedures , 2022 .

[45]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[46]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  Exploring the Utility of Product Dissection for Early-Phase Idea Generation , 2013 .

[47]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[48]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  DESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUES IN REVERSE ENGINEERING AND REDESIGN , 1996 .

[49]  F. Paas,et al.  Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning , 2006 .

[50]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[51]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the use of cyberinfrastructure in the classroom to enhance product dissection , 2007 .

[52]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[53]  Susana Rubio,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and Workload Profile Methods , 2004 .

[54]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[55]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[56]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[57]  S. Sheppard.  MECHANICAL DISSECTION: AN EXPERIENCE IN HOW THINGS WORK , 1996 .

[58]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[59]  Louis Deslauriers,et al.  Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class , 2011, Science.

[60]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes , 2015 .

[61]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Characterizing the Effect of Domain Distance in Design-by-Analogy , 2011 .

[62]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  Thérèse Bouffard-Bouchard,et al.  Influence of Self-Efficacy on Self-Regulation and Performance among Junior and Senior High-School Age Students , 1991 .

[64]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[65]  Wei Chen,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Virtual and Physical Dissection Activities on Students’ Understanding of Engineering Design Principles , 2008 .

[66]  Charles Ume,et al.  Mechatronics instruction in the Mechanical Engineering curriculum at Georgia Tech , 1995 .

[67]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The Meaning of “Near” and “Far”: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output , 2012 .

[68]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity , 2014 .

[69]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. , 1984 .

[70]  David Klahr,et al.  The role of quantification operators in the development of conservation of quantity , 1973 .

[71]  Christine Charyton,et al.  An Overview of the Relevance of Creative Engineering Design: Background , 2014 .

[72]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning : Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles , 2005 .

[73]  John S. Lamancusa,et al.  Learning Engineering by Product Dissection , 1996 .

[74]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  The Role of Personality and Team-based Product Dissection on Fixation Effects , 2013 .

[75]  J. P. Mohsen,et al.  Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[76]  Elizabeth M. Starkey,et al.  Let’s Get Physical? The Impact of Dissection Modality on Engineering Student Design Learning , 2016 .

[77]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Representing Analogies: Increasing the Probability of Innovation , 2006 .

[78]  M. Runco,et al.  The Standard Definition of Creativity , 2012 .

[79]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Measuring Engineering Design Self‐Efficacy , 2010 .

[80]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  The Impact of Team-Based Product Dissection on Design Novelty , 2014 .

[81]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[82]  Jens E. Jorgensen,et al.  Product dissection-a tool for benchmarking in the process of teaching design , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[83]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. , 2011 .

[84]  Karen O'Quin,et al.  Confirming the Three-Factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix Model in an American Sample , 1999 .

[85]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Examining design fixation in engineering idea generation: the role of example modality , 2013 .

[86]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[87]  P. Tsang,et al.  Diagnosticity and multidimensional subjective workload ratings. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[88]  Samuel T. Hunter,et al.  Is Being a Jerk Necessary for Originality? Examining the Role of Disagreeableness in the Sharing and Utilization of Original Ideas , 2015 .

[89]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[90]  Li-tze Hu,et al.  Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. , 2001 .

[91]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[92]  T. B. Ward,et al.  The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[93]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[94]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Students connecting engineering fundamentals and hardware design: observations and implications for the design of curriculum and assessment methods , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[95]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Social cognitive theory , 2015 .