Ensemble-based data assimilation for operational flood forecasting – On the merits of state estimation for 1D hydrodynamic forecasting through the example of the “Adour Maritime” river

This study presents the implementation and the merits of an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) algorithm with an inflation procedure on the 1D shallow water model MASCARET in the framework of operational flood forecasting on the “Adour Maritime” river (South West France). In situ water level observations are sequentially assimilated to correct both water level and discharge. The stochastic estimation of the background error statistics is achieved over an ensemble of MASCARET integrations with perturbed hydrological boundary conditions. It is shown that the geometric characteristics of the network as well as the hydrological forcings and their temporal variability have a significant impact on the shape of the univariate (water level) and multivariate (water level and discharge) background error covariance functions and thus on the EnKF analysis. The performance of the EnKF algorithm is examined for observing system simulation experiments as well as for a set of eight real flood events (2009–2014). The quality of the ensemble is deemed satisfactory as long as the forecast lead time remains under the transfer time of the network, when perfect hydrological forcings are considered. Results demonstrate that the simulated hydraulic state variables can be improved over the entire network, even where no data are available, with a limited ensemble size and thus a computational cost compatible with operational constraints. The improvement in the water level Root-Mean-Square Error obtained with the EnKF reaches up to 88% at the analysis time and 40% at a 4-h forecast lead time compared to the standalone model.

[1]  Delwyn Moller,et al.  Estimation of bathymetric depth and slope from data assimilation of swath altimetry into a hydrodynamic model , 2008 .

[2]  P. Roe.  Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[3]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Quantifying Precipitation Uncertainty for Land Data Assimilation Applications , 2015 .

[4]  Jacques Sau,et al.  Data assimilation for real-time estimation of hydraulic states and unmeasured perturbations in a 1D hydrodynamic model , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[5]  Takemasa Miyoshi,et al.  ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER EXPERIMENTS WITH A PRIMITIVE-EQUATION GLOBAL MODEL , 2005 .

[6]  A. Piacentini,et al.  Correction of upstream flow and hydraulic state with data assimilation in the context of flood forecasting , 2010 .

[7]  G. Evensen.  Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[8]  Michael Durand,et al.  Assimilation of virtual wide swath altimetry to improve Arctic river modeling , 2011 .

[9]  G. Lannoy,et al.  Assimilating SAR-derived water level data into a hydraulic model: A case study , 2011 .

[10]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  An adaptive covariance inflation error correction algorithm for ensemble filters , 2007 .

[11]  G. Dumedah,et al.  Assessment of model behavior and acceptable forcing data uncertainty in the context of land surface soil moisture estimation , 2017 .

[12]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  A Monte Carlo Implementation of the Nonlinear Filtering Problem to Produce Ensemble Assimilations and Forecasts , 1999 .

[13]  Yasuto Tachikawa,et al.  Real-time stage and discharge estimation by a stochastic-dynamic flood routing model , 2000 .

[14]  G. Evensen,et al.  Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 1998 .

[15]  G. Brier.  VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY , 1950 .

[16]  E. Anagnostou,et al.  The impact of model and rainfall forcing errors on characterizing soil moisture uncertainty in land surface modeling , 2012 .

[17]  Yeosang Yoon,et al.  Estimating river bathymetry from data assimilation of synthetic SWOT measurements , 2012 .

[18]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Prospects for river discharge and depth estimation through assimilation of swath‐altimetry into a raster‐based hydrodynamics model , 2007 .

[19]  J. Singarayer,et al.  An oceanic origin for the increase of atmospheric radiocarbon during the Younger Dryas , 2008 .

[20]  J. S. Verkade,et al.  Estimation of Predictive Hydrological Uncertainty using Quantile Regression , 2010 .

[21]  Paul Poli,et al.  Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis‐error statistics in observation space , 2005 .

[22]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting—a combined filtering and error forecasting procedure , 2005 .

[23]  J. Wahr,et al.  Elastic uplift in southeast Greenland due to rapid ice mass loss , 2007 .

[24]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009The numbers and trends , 2010 .

[25]  Silvia Bozzi,et al.  Roughness and Discharge Uncertainty in 1D Water Level Calculations , 2015, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[26]  Omar M. Knio,et al.  Quantifying initial and wind forcing uncertainties in the Gulf of Mexico , 2016, Computational Geosciences.

[27]  N. Gouta,et al.  A finite volume solver for 1D shallow‐water equations applied to an actual river , 2002 .

[28]  ANDREA PIACENTINI,et al.  O-PALM : AN OPEN SOURCE DYNAMIC PARALLEL COUPLER , 2010 .

[29]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  A data assimilation approach to discharge estimation from space , 2009 .

[30]  Jaap Schellekens,et al.  Recent developments in operational flood forecasting in England, Wales and Scotland , 2009 .

[31]  Samuel Buis,et al.  PALM: a computational framework for assembling high-performance computing applications , 2006 .

[32]  R. De Keyser,et al.  Towards the sequential assimilation of SAR-derived water stages into hydraulic models using the Particle Filter: proof of concept , 2010 .

[33]  Mélanie C. Rochoux,et al.  Reduction of the uncertainties in the water level-discharge relation of a 1D hydraulic model in the context of operational flood forecasting , 2016 .

[34]  E. Kalnay,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of covariance inflation and observation errors within an ensemble Kalman filter , 2009 .

[35]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .